积极写作干预慢性疼痛的有效性:一项随机试验

K. Ziemer, Amy C Fuhrmann, M. Hoffman
{"title":"积极写作干预慢性疼痛的有效性:一项随机试验","authors":"K. Ziemer, Amy C Fuhrmann, M. Hoffman","doi":"10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: There is a need to develop efficient, cost-effective psychological interventions for chronic pain. Expressive writing has been found to produce beneficial psychological and physical outcomes for those with chronic medical conditions. Positive expressive writing may also be beneficial to those with musculoskeletal pain, but this type of writing has not been studied before with this population. The current study was a pilot to explore how chronic pain patients respond to two positive variations of the expressive writing paradigm. Methods: Ninety-three participants with chronic pain were recruited from chronic pain forums and completed the writing exercise. Participants were randomized to either self-compassion or self-efficacy writing and wrote for 20 min once a week for three consecutive weeks. Participants completed baseline and post-writing measures of pain severity, illness intrusiveness, pain acceptance, pain catastrophizing, depression symptoms, life satisfaction, self-compassion and chronic pain self-efficacy. Results: Overall, both types of writing helped participants, who reported that the exercise was a positive experience. Raters were able to accurately identify the writing group for the majority of participants, which indicates that most participants followed the writing instructions. Few differences were found between the two writing groups, though when participants in either group reported an increase in self-compassion or self-efficacy, they also reported better physical and psychological outcomes. Conclusions: Participants with chronic pain appear to be open to self-compassion and self-efficacy writing. Positive writing may be useful to the extent that it increases self-compassion and self-efficacy.","PeriodicalId":91773,"journal":{"name":"Myopain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Positive Writing Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Trial\",\"authors\":\"K. Ziemer, Amy C Fuhrmann, M. Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: There is a need to develop efficient, cost-effective psychological interventions for chronic pain. Expressive writing has been found to produce beneficial psychological and physical outcomes for those with chronic medical conditions. Positive expressive writing may also be beneficial to those with musculoskeletal pain, but this type of writing has not been studied before with this population. The current study was a pilot to explore how chronic pain patients respond to two positive variations of the expressive writing paradigm. Methods: Ninety-three participants with chronic pain were recruited from chronic pain forums and completed the writing exercise. Participants were randomized to either self-compassion or self-efficacy writing and wrote for 20 min once a week for three consecutive weeks. Participants completed baseline and post-writing measures of pain severity, illness intrusiveness, pain acceptance, pain catastrophizing, depression symptoms, life satisfaction, self-compassion and chronic pain self-efficacy. Results: Overall, both types of writing helped participants, who reported that the exercise was a positive experience. Raters were able to accurately identify the writing group for the majority of participants, which indicates that most participants followed the writing instructions. Few differences were found between the two writing groups, though when participants in either group reported an increase in self-compassion or self-efficacy, they also reported better physical and psychological outcomes. Conclusions: Participants with chronic pain appear to be open to self-compassion and self-efficacy writing. Positive writing may be useful to the extent that it increases self-compassion and self-efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Myopain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Myopain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Myopain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24708593.2017.1307893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:有必要开发有效的,具有成本效益的心理干预慢性疼痛。研究发现,表达性写作对那些患有慢性疾病的人产生有益的心理和生理结果。积极的表达性写作也可能对那些肌肉骨骼疼痛的人有益,但这种类型的写作之前还没有研究过。目前的研究是探索慢性疼痛患者如何对表达性写作范式的两种积极变化作出反应的试点。方法:从慢性疼痛论坛招募93名慢性疼痛患者完成写作练习。参与者被随机分为自我同情写作组和自我效能写作组,每周写作一次,每次20分钟,连续三周。参与者完成了疼痛严重程度、疾病侵入性、疼痛接受度、疼痛灾难化、抑郁症状、生活满意度、自我同情和慢性疼痛自我效能的基线和写作后测量。结果:总的来说,这两种类型的写作都对参与者有帮助,他们报告说练习是一次积极的经历。评分者能够准确地识别出大多数参与者的写作组,这表明大多数参与者都遵循了写作指导。两个写作组之间几乎没有发现什么差异,尽管当任何一组的参与者报告自我同情或自我效能增加时,他们也报告了更好的身体和心理结果。结论:慢性疼痛的参与者似乎对自我同情和自我效能写作持开放态度。积极的写作在一定程度上可能是有用的,因为它增加了自我同情和自我效能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a Positive Writing Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Trial
Abstract Objectives: There is a need to develop efficient, cost-effective psychological interventions for chronic pain. Expressive writing has been found to produce beneficial psychological and physical outcomes for those with chronic medical conditions. Positive expressive writing may also be beneficial to those with musculoskeletal pain, but this type of writing has not been studied before with this population. The current study was a pilot to explore how chronic pain patients respond to two positive variations of the expressive writing paradigm. Methods: Ninety-three participants with chronic pain were recruited from chronic pain forums and completed the writing exercise. Participants were randomized to either self-compassion or self-efficacy writing and wrote for 20 min once a week for three consecutive weeks. Participants completed baseline and post-writing measures of pain severity, illness intrusiveness, pain acceptance, pain catastrophizing, depression symptoms, life satisfaction, self-compassion and chronic pain self-efficacy. Results: Overall, both types of writing helped participants, who reported that the exercise was a positive experience. Raters were able to accurately identify the writing group for the majority of participants, which indicates that most participants followed the writing instructions. Few differences were found between the two writing groups, though when participants in either group reported an increase in self-compassion or self-efficacy, they also reported better physical and psychological outcomes. Conclusions: Participants with chronic pain appear to be open to self-compassion and self-efficacy writing. Positive writing may be useful to the extent that it increases self-compassion and self-efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信