J. Armer, J. Feldman, Pamela L. Ostby, K. M. Thrift, B. Lasinski, Marcia Beck, Julia R. Rodrick, S. Norton, Yuanlu Sun, T. Udmuangpia, Nathan C. Armer, B. Stewart
{"title":"简化乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的循证管理","authors":"J. Armer, J. Feldman, Pamela L. Ostby, K. M. Thrift, B. Lasinski, Marcia Beck, Julia R. Rodrick, S. Norton, Yuanlu Sun, T. Udmuangpia, Nathan C. Armer, B. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2016.1230019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: This expert review examines the evidence base for lymphedema management and recommends ways to improve outcomes for breast cancer survivors at risk of and living with lymphedema through simplifying evidence-based self-management recommendations. Lymphedema risk-reduction and self-management behaviors can be complex and burdensome to survivors, underscoring the need for simplifying the self-management recommendations. Areas covered: Systematic reviews on complete decongestive therapy; complementary/alternative therapies; botanicals; exercise; surgical treatment; intermittent pneumatic compression therapy; psychosocial issues; self-management; and economic and health policy are summarized. Historic perspectives and future projections are presented. Expert commentary: The reviews establish the evidence base for the recommendations for simplification of self-management guidelines for persons at risk for and living with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Further research is needed to enhance levels of evidence for breast cancer-related lymphedema management. More rigorously-designed studies with larger samples, longer follow-up, and finely-tuned interventions and dosages are needed to extend our evidence base.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"389 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1230019","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplifying evidence-based management of breast cancer-related lymphedema\",\"authors\":\"J. Armer, J. Feldman, Pamela L. Ostby, K. M. Thrift, B. Lasinski, Marcia Beck, Julia R. Rodrick, S. Norton, Yuanlu Sun, T. Udmuangpia, Nathan C. Armer, B. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23809000.2016.1230019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction: This expert review examines the evidence base for lymphedema management and recommends ways to improve outcomes for breast cancer survivors at risk of and living with lymphedema through simplifying evidence-based self-management recommendations. Lymphedema risk-reduction and self-management behaviors can be complex and burdensome to survivors, underscoring the need for simplifying the self-management recommendations. Areas covered: Systematic reviews on complete decongestive therapy; complementary/alternative therapies; botanicals; exercise; surgical treatment; intermittent pneumatic compression therapy; psychosocial issues; self-management; and economic and health policy are summarized. Historic perspectives and future projections are presented. Expert commentary: The reviews establish the evidence base for the recommendations for simplification of self-management guidelines for persons at risk for and living with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Further research is needed to enhance levels of evidence for breast cancer-related lymphedema management. More rigorously-designed studies with larger samples, longer follow-up, and finely-tuned interventions and dosages are needed to extend our evidence base.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"389 - 402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1230019\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1230019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1230019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simplifying evidence-based management of breast cancer-related lymphedema
ABSTRACT Introduction: This expert review examines the evidence base for lymphedema management and recommends ways to improve outcomes for breast cancer survivors at risk of and living with lymphedema through simplifying evidence-based self-management recommendations. Lymphedema risk-reduction and self-management behaviors can be complex and burdensome to survivors, underscoring the need for simplifying the self-management recommendations. Areas covered: Systematic reviews on complete decongestive therapy; complementary/alternative therapies; botanicals; exercise; surgical treatment; intermittent pneumatic compression therapy; psychosocial issues; self-management; and economic and health policy are summarized. Historic perspectives and future projections are presented. Expert commentary: The reviews establish the evidence base for the recommendations for simplification of self-management guidelines for persons at risk for and living with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Further research is needed to enhance levels of evidence for breast cancer-related lymphedema management. More rigorously-designed studies with larger samples, longer follow-up, and finely-tuned interventions and dosages are needed to extend our evidence base.