Y. Hao, Meaghan Krohe, I. Mazar, N. Galipeau, C. Foley, D. Globe, D. Turner-Bowker, A. Shields
{"title":"晚期乳腺癌患者报告的结果:在标签和批准文件中","authors":"Y. Hao, Meaghan Krohe, I. Mazar, N. Galipeau, C. Foley, D. Globe, D. Turner-Bowker, A. Shields","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are used in clinical research and practice for the assessment of disease-related symptoms and impacts as well as treatment-related side effects, from the patient perspective. However, a systematic examination of the role of PROs in metastatic breast cancer treatment approvals is lacking. A review of FDA labels and historical drug approval documents for metastatic breast cancer treatments was conducted to determine how PROs had been used or pursued to support labeling claims. In the historical drug approval documents, PROs were often being implemented by sponsors, and regulatory reviewers noted several issues limiting their suitability to support label claims. The findings suggest there is much room for improvement in how sponsors develop, implement, and report PRO measurement strategies as part of drug approval.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"197 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer: inside the label and approval documents\",\"authors\":\"Y. Hao, Meaghan Krohe, I. Mazar, N. Galipeau, C. Foley, D. Globe, D. Turner-Bowker, A. Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are used in clinical research and practice for the assessment of disease-related symptoms and impacts as well as treatment-related side effects, from the patient perspective. However, a systematic examination of the role of PROs in metastatic breast cancer treatment approvals is lacking. A review of FDA labels and historical drug approval documents for metastatic breast cancer treatments was conducted to determine how PROs had been used or pursued to support labeling claims. In the historical drug approval documents, PROs were often being implemented by sponsors, and regulatory reviewers noted several issues limiting their suitability to support label claims. The findings suggest there is much room for improvement in how sponsors develop, implement, and report PRO measurement strategies as part of drug approval.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer: inside the label and approval documents
ABSTRACT Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are used in clinical research and practice for the assessment of disease-related symptoms and impacts as well as treatment-related side effects, from the patient perspective. However, a systematic examination of the role of PROs in metastatic breast cancer treatment approvals is lacking. A review of FDA labels and historical drug approval documents for metastatic breast cancer treatments was conducted to determine how PROs had been used or pursued to support labeling claims. In the historical drug approval documents, PROs were often being implemented by sponsors, and regulatory reviewers noted several issues limiting their suitability to support label claims. The findings suggest there is much room for improvement in how sponsors develop, implement, and report PRO measurement strategies as part of drug approval.