{"title":"施用HBED-Fe和EDDHA-Fe后温室番茄和黄瓜叶片叶绿素含量的比较","authors":"Gilbert Medawar, G. Srour, D. El Azzi","doi":"10.1080/21553769.2016.1193828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Iron is an essential micro-element for plant growth. In the calcareous soils of Lebanon, immobilization of iron can lead to chlorosis and reduce the yields of agricultural production. Iron fertilization is therefore crucial to ensure good plant growth. The objective of this work was to compare the efficiency of the iron chelate HBED-Fe to that of EDDHA-Fe, on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and cucumber crops (Cucumis sativus L.). Five modules were studied in two separate greenhouses: one control, one module with fertilization by EDDHA-Fe and three modules with different applications of HBED-Fe. Chlorophyll and Fe contents in leaves were analyzed at different stages of the plants' cycle. Cucumber crops treated with HBED-Fe showed 19.2% higher chlorophyll content than the ones treated with EDDHA-Fe. Tomato crops presented 11.2% higher chlorophyll content when treated with HBED-Fe. For cucumbers, HBED-Fe should be applied in three applications separated by 25 days. For tomatoes, HBED-Fe should be applied in two applications separated by a month. The use of the HBED9% iron chelate was proved to be more effective than that of EDDHA6% because more efficiency was achieved with 40% less application rate. Multiple applications were also more effective than single applications.","PeriodicalId":12756,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Life Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21553769.2016.1193828","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of chlorophyll content in greenhouse tomato and cucumber leaves after HBED-Fe and EDDHA-Fe applications\",\"authors\":\"Gilbert Medawar, G. Srour, D. El Azzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21553769.2016.1193828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Iron is an essential micro-element for plant growth. In the calcareous soils of Lebanon, immobilization of iron can lead to chlorosis and reduce the yields of agricultural production. Iron fertilization is therefore crucial to ensure good plant growth. The objective of this work was to compare the efficiency of the iron chelate HBED-Fe to that of EDDHA-Fe, on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and cucumber crops (Cucumis sativus L.). Five modules were studied in two separate greenhouses: one control, one module with fertilization by EDDHA-Fe and three modules with different applications of HBED-Fe. Chlorophyll and Fe contents in leaves were analyzed at different stages of the plants' cycle. Cucumber crops treated with HBED-Fe showed 19.2% higher chlorophyll content than the ones treated with EDDHA-Fe. Tomato crops presented 11.2% higher chlorophyll content when treated with HBED-Fe. For cucumbers, HBED-Fe should be applied in three applications separated by 25 days. For tomatoes, HBED-Fe should be applied in two applications separated by a month. The use of the HBED9% iron chelate was proved to be more effective than that of EDDHA6% because more efficiency was achieved with 40% less application rate. Multiple applications were also more effective than single applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Life Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21553769.2016.1193828\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Life Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1193828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Life Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1193828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of chlorophyll content in greenhouse tomato and cucumber leaves after HBED-Fe and EDDHA-Fe applications
ABSTRACT Iron is an essential micro-element for plant growth. In the calcareous soils of Lebanon, immobilization of iron can lead to chlorosis and reduce the yields of agricultural production. Iron fertilization is therefore crucial to ensure good plant growth. The objective of this work was to compare the efficiency of the iron chelate HBED-Fe to that of EDDHA-Fe, on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and cucumber crops (Cucumis sativus L.). Five modules were studied in two separate greenhouses: one control, one module with fertilization by EDDHA-Fe and three modules with different applications of HBED-Fe. Chlorophyll and Fe contents in leaves were analyzed at different stages of the plants' cycle. Cucumber crops treated with HBED-Fe showed 19.2% higher chlorophyll content than the ones treated with EDDHA-Fe. Tomato crops presented 11.2% higher chlorophyll content when treated with HBED-Fe. For cucumbers, HBED-Fe should be applied in three applications separated by 25 days. For tomatoes, HBED-Fe should be applied in two applications separated by a month. The use of the HBED9% iron chelate was proved to be more effective than that of EDDHA6% because more efficiency was achieved with 40% less application rate. Multiple applications were also more effective than single applications.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Life Science publishes high quality and innovative research at the frontier of biology with an emphasis on interdisciplinary research. We particularly encourage manuscripts that lie at the interface of the life sciences and either the more quantitative sciences (including chemistry, physics, mathematics, and informatics) or the social sciences (philosophy, anthropology, sociology and epistemology). We believe that these various disciplines can all contribute to biological research and provide original insights to the most recurrent questions.