{"title":"激进主义","authors":"G. Marchetti","doi":"10.1080/17508061.2016.1144705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Activism refers to taking direct action in support of, or in opposition to, a social or political policy. The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the roots of the word back to 1915 when Swedish ‘activists’ petitioned for the end of that country’s neutrality in World War I (WWI). However, film activism may predate the use of this nomenclature. Suffragettes, for example, appeared on film as early as 1899, and they continued to agitate for their cause in silent features, such as What 80 Million Women Want (Will Lewis, 1913). Putative understandings of activist films, as opposed to other types of political filmmaking, place them outside journalistic reportage or specific government propaganda programs in the realm of revolutionary movements, reform initiatives and struggles for social justice. Fiction and non-fiction filmmakers around the world take up the camera now more likely digital than not in order to agitate for political or social causes. Others use the motion picture medium to record these movements for posterity as narrative features, documentaries or hybrid forms. The 1919 May Fourth Movement in China nourished a generation of activists advocating for action against Japanese aggression, colonialism, capitalist greed and patriarchal excesses on the silent screen. Many were inspired by the ‘agit-prop’ films made in the Soviet Union by filmmakers, such as Dziga Vertov, V. I. Pudovkin and Sergei Eisenstein. At the conclusion of the Pacific War, filmmakers migrated from their leftwing roots in Republican era critical realism to government-sanctioned socialist realism and revolutionary romanticism in the People’s Republic, and to ‘healthy’ realism in the Republic of China on Taiwan. With this, films became less ‘activist’ in the original sense and more accurately films ‘about’ political heroes used as propaganda for government programs. However, amateur, underground and sundry oppositional cinematic practices continued, particularly on the margins of the Chinese-speaking world. In the cinema clubs that sprang up in Hong Kong to support small-gauge production, filmmakers took a decidedly political turn in the wake of the 1967 riots. As Ian Aitken and Mike Ingham point out in their research on Hong Kong documentary films (Hong Kong Documentary Film, Edinburgh, 2014), key figures, such as Clifford Choi, Lau Fung-kut, Law Kar, Stephen Teo and Lo King-wah made films in support of specific protest movements, such as the campaign to reclaim the Diaoyu Islands, throughout the 1970s and 1980s. New Wave director Tsui Hark began his filmmaking career at Newsreel in New York (later California and Third","PeriodicalId":43535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Cinemas","volume":"10 1","pages":"4 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17508061.2016.1144705","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activism\",\"authors\":\"G. Marchetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508061.2016.1144705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Activism refers to taking direct action in support of, or in opposition to, a social or political policy. The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the roots of the word back to 1915 when Swedish ‘activists’ petitioned for the end of that country’s neutrality in World War I (WWI). However, film activism may predate the use of this nomenclature. Suffragettes, for example, appeared on film as early as 1899, and they continued to agitate for their cause in silent features, such as What 80 Million Women Want (Will Lewis, 1913). Putative understandings of activist films, as opposed to other types of political filmmaking, place them outside journalistic reportage or specific government propaganda programs in the realm of revolutionary movements, reform initiatives and struggles for social justice. Fiction and non-fiction filmmakers around the world take up the camera now more likely digital than not in order to agitate for political or social causes. Others use the motion picture medium to record these movements for posterity as narrative features, documentaries or hybrid forms. The 1919 May Fourth Movement in China nourished a generation of activists advocating for action against Japanese aggression, colonialism, capitalist greed and patriarchal excesses on the silent screen. Many were inspired by the ‘agit-prop’ films made in the Soviet Union by filmmakers, such as Dziga Vertov, V. I. Pudovkin and Sergei Eisenstein. At the conclusion of the Pacific War, filmmakers migrated from their leftwing roots in Republican era critical realism to government-sanctioned socialist realism and revolutionary romanticism in the People’s Republic, and to ‘healthy’ realism in the Republic of China on Taiwan. With this, films became less ‘activist’ in the original sense and more accurately films ‘about’ political heroes used as propaganda for government programs. However, amateur, underground and sundry oppositional cinematic practices continued, particularly on the margins of the Chinese-speaking world. In the cinema clubs that sprang up in Hong Kong to support small-gauge production, filmmakers took a decidedly political turn in the wake of the 1967 riots. As Ian Aitken and Mike Ingham point out in their research on Hong Kong documentary films (Hong Kong Documentary Film, Edinburgh, 2014), key figures, such as Clifford Choi, Lau Fung-kut, Law Kar, Stephen Teo and Lo King-wah made films in support of specific protest movements, such as the campaign to reclaim the Diaoyu Islands, throughout the 1970s and 1980s. New Wave director Tsui Hark began his filmmaking career at Newsreel in New York (later California and Third\",\"PeriodicalId\":43535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Cinemas\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17508061.2016.1144705\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Cinemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2016.1144705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Cinemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2016.1144705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67
摘要
激进主义指的是采取直接行动支持或反对某种社会或政治政策。在线词源词典将这个词的词根追溯到1915年,当时瑞典的“激进分子”呼吁结束该国在第一次世界大战中的中立地位。然而,电影激进主义可能早于这个术语的使用。例如,妇女参政权论者早在1899年就出现在电影中,她们继续在无声电影中为自己的事业而鼓动,比如《八千万妇女想要什么》(威尔·刘易斯,1913年)。与其他类型的政治电影制作相反,对激进主义电影的假定理解将它们置于新闻报道或特定的政府宣传计划之外,即革命运动,改革倡议和争取社会正义的斗争。世界各地的小说和非小说电影制作人现在更有可能拿起相机,而不是不是为了鼓动政治或社会事业。其他人则使用电影媒介将这些运动以叙事特征、纪录片或混合形式记录下来,留给后人。1919年中国的五四运动培养了一代积极分子,他们在无声银幕上倡导采取行动,反对日本的侵略、殖民主义、资本主义的贪婪和父权的过度行为。许多人的灵感来自苏联电影人制作的“反主流”电影,如吉加·维尔托夫(Dziga Vertov)、v·i·普多夫金(V. I. Pudovkin)和谢尔盖·爱森斯坦(Sergei Eisenstein)。太平洋战争结束后,电影人从共和时代的左翼批判现实主义转向了政府认可的社会主义现实主义和人民共和国的革命浪漫主义,并转向了中华民国台湾的“健康”现实主义。因此,电影在最初的意义上变得不那么“激进”,而更准确地说,电影是“关于”被用作政府项目宣传的政治英雄的。然而,业余的、地下的和各种各样的反对电影实践仍在继续,特别是在华语世界的边缘。在香港如雨后春笋般涌现的支持小规格电影制作的电影俱乐部中,电影制作人在1967年的骚乱之后果断地转向了政治。正如Ian Aitken和Mike Ingham在他们对香港纪录片的研究(Hong Kong documentary Film, Edinburgh, 2014)中指出的那样,在整个20世纪70年代和80年代,蔡志强、刘凤久、罗嘉、张志贤和罗敬华等关键人物拍摄了支持特定抗议运动的电影,如收回钓鱼岛的运动。新浪潮导演徐克在纽约的新闻片(后来的加利福尼亚和第三)开始了他的电影生涯
Activism refers to taking direct action in support of, or in opposition to, a social or political policy. The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the roots of the word back to 1915 when Swedish ‘activists’ petitioned for the end of that country’s neutrality in World War I (WWI). However, film activism may predate the use of this nomenclature. Suffragettes, for example, appeared on film as early as 1899, and they continued to agitate for their cause in silent features, such as What 80 Million Women Want (Will Lewis, 1913). Putative understandings of activist films, as opposed to other types of political filmmaking, place them outside journalistic reportage or specific government propaganda programs in the realm of revolutionary movements, reform initiatives and struggles for social justice. Fiction and non-fiction filmmakers around the world take up the camera now more likely digital than not in order to agitate for political or social causes. Others use the motion picture medium to record these movements for posterity as narrative features, documentaries or hybrid forms. The 1919 May Fourth Movement in China nourished a generation of activists advocating for action against Japanese aggression, colonialism, capitalist greed and patriarchal excesses on the silent screen. Many were inspired by the ‘agit-prop’ films made in the Soviet Union by filmmakers, such as Dziga Vertov, V. I. Pudovkin and Sergei Eisenstein. At the conclusion of the Pacific War, filmmakers migrated from their leftwing roots in Republican era critical realism to government-sanctioned socialist realism and revolutionary romanticism in the People’s Republic, and to ‘healthy’ realism in the Republic of China on Taiwan. With this, films became less ‘activist’ in the original sense and more accurately films ‘about’ political heroes used as propaganda for government programs. However, amateur, underground and sundry oppositional cinematic practices continued, particularly on the margins of the Chinese-speaking world. In the cinema clubs that sprang up in Hong Kong to support small-gauge production, filmmakers took a decidedly political turn in the wake of the 1967 riots. As Ian Aitken and Mike Ingham point out in their research on Hong Kong documentary films (Hong Kong Documentary Film, Edinburgh, 2014), key figures, such as Clifford Choi, Lau Fung-kut, Law Kar, Stephen Teo and Lo King-wah made films in support of specific protest movements, such as the campaign to reclaim the Diaoyu Islands, throughout the 1970s and 1980s. New Wave director Tsui Hark began his filmmaking career at Newsreel in New York (later California and Third