{"title":"对南非来说,COP26的结果是公正的?","authors":"Melanie Murcott","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2022.2160123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At COP26 several global North states as well as the European Union committed to mobilising funding for South Africa’s just energy transition to the tune of $8.5 billion. The commitment was made in a ‘Political Declaration on the Just Transition in South Africa’ by the governments of South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, and Germany, together with the European Union. In response, civil society actors within South Africa such as the Climate Justice Charter Movement, have expressed serious, well-founded concerns about the South African government’s willingness to end the country’s dependence on coal, oil, and gas. These actors raise questions about whether the funding will be used in a manner that advances climate justice for the global South. Centring the voices of climate justice activists, and adopting a climate justice lens, this commentary describes and evaluates the funding commitment made to South Africa at COP26 and then reflects on civil society’s concerns.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":"13 1","pages":"352 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A just COP26 outcome for South Africa?\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Murcott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20414005.2022.2160123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT At COP26 several global North states as well as the European Union committed to mobilising funding for South Africa’s just energy transition to the tune of $8.5 billion. The commitment was made in a ‘Political Declaration on the Just Transition in South Africa’ by the governments of South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, and Germany, together with the European Union. In response, civil society actors within South Africa such as the Climate Justice Charter Movement, have expressed serious, well-founded concerns about the South African government’s willingness to end the country’s dependence on coal, oil, and gas. These actors raise questions about whether the funding will be used in a manner that advances climate justice for the global South. Centring the voices of climate justice activists, and adopting a climate justice lens, this commentary describes and evaluates the funding commitment made to South Africa at COP26 and then reflects on civil society’s concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"352 - 365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2022.2160123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2022.2160123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT At COP26 several global North states as well as the European Union committed to mobilising funding for South Africa’s just energy transition to the tune of $8.5 billion. The commitment was made in a ‘Political Declaration on the Just Transition in South Africa’ by the governments of South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, and Germany, together with the European Union. In response, civil society actors within South Africa such as the Climate Justice Charter Movement, have expressed serious, well-founded concerns about the South African government’s willingness to end the country’s dependence on coal, oil, and gas. These actors raise questions about whether the funding will be used in a manner that advances climate justice for the global South. Centring the voices of climate justice activists, and adopting a climate justice lens, this commentary describes and evaluates the funding commitment made to South Africa at COP26 and then reflects on civil society’s concerns.
期刊介绍:
The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.