基础阅读者的性别处理

Maxwell W. Hunter, Kay A. Chick
{"title":"基础阅读者的性别处理","authors":"Maxwell W. Hunter, Kay A. Chick","doi":"10.1080/19388070509558432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nominal level gender and gender‐related information in four, well‐known basal reading series was gathered and analyzed. For each of 746 stories, the number of male and female main characters in text and illustrations was determined. Employment status, job title and estimated yearly salary were obtained for employed adult, human, main characters. The total number of male main characters in text and illustrations was significantly greater than the total number of female main characters. The proportion of adult, human, male main characters who were employed was significantly greater than the analogous proportion of female main characters. It is asserted that given the developmental status of children who use basal readers, and in the absence of explanation, it remains objectionable for significantly more basal reader main characters to be male. The finding in the current data that adult male characters, beyond their greater number, were also disproportionately more likely to be employed is seen to present an additional basis for objection.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"44 1","pages":"65 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070509558432","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of gender in basal readers\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell W. Hunter, Kay A. Chick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070509558432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Nominal level gender and gender‐related information in four, well‐known basal reading series was gathered and analyzed. For each of 746 stories, the number of male and female main characters in text and illustrations was determined. Employment status, job title and estimated yearly salary were obtained for employed adult, human, main characters. The total number of male main characters in text and illustrations was significantly greater than the total number of female main characters. The proportion of adult, human, male main characters who were employed was significantly greater than the analogous proportion of female main characters. It is asserted that given the developmental status of children who use basal readers, and in the absence of explanation, it remains objectionable for significantly more basal reader main characters to be male. The finding in the current data that adult male characters, beyond their greater number, were also disproportionately more likely to be employed is seen to present an additional basis for objection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070509558432\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070509558432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070509558432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要:本文收集并分析了四个知名基础阅读系列的名义水平性别和性别相关信息。对于746个故事中的每一个,确定了文本和插图中男性和女性主要角色的数量。获得在职成人、人、主要人物的就业状况、职称和预计年薪。文本和插图中男性主角的总数显著大于女性主角的总数。使用成人、人类、男性主角的比例显著高于女性主角的比例。本文认为,鉴于使用基础阅读器的儿童的发展状况,在缺乏解释的情况下,使用更多基础阅读器的主要角色是男性仍然是令人反感的。目前的数据显示,成年男性角色除了数量更多之外,更有可能被雇佣,这似乎是反对意见的另一个依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of gender in basal readers
Abstract Nominal level gender and gender‐related information in four, well‐known basal reading series was gathered and analyzed. For each of 746 stories, the number of male and female main characters in text and illustrations was determined. Employment status, job title and estimated yearly salary were obtained for employed adult, human, main characters. The total number of male main characters in text and illustrations was significantly greater than the total number of female main characters. The proportion of adult, human, male main characters who were employed was significantly greater than the analogous proportion of female main characters. It is asserted that given the developmental status of children who use basal readers, and in the absence of explanation, it remains objectionable for significantly more basal reader main characters to be male. The finding in the current data that adult male characters, beyond their greater number, were also disproportionately more likely to be employed is seen to present an additional basis for objection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信