{"title":"影响扫盲政策决策的因素:关键政策举报人的观点","authors":"Maryann Mraz","doi":"10.1080/19388070509558409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of key policy informants on the factors that they believed influence policy decisions in literacy education. Participants were selected because they had significantly influenced, or had attempted to influence, policy decisions in literacy at either the national or state level. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven key informants and four nominated informants. An inductive data analysis revealed five broad domains that addressed the participants’ perspective on factors of influence: literacy professionals, public sentiment, selected policy participants, conservative voices, and research.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"43 1","pages":"20 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070509558409","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that influence policy decisions in literacy: Perspectives of key policy informants\",\"authors\":\"Maryann Mraz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070509558409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of key policy informants on the factors that they believed influence policy decisions in literacy education. Participants were selected because they had significantly influenced, or had attempted to influence, policy decisions in literacy at either the national or state level. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven key informants and four nominated informants. An inductive data analysis revealed five broad domains that addressed the participants’ perspective on factors of influence: literacy professionals, public sentiment, selected policy participants, conservative voices, and research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070509558409\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070509558409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070509558409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors that influence policy decisions in literacy: Perspectives of key policy informants
Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of key policy informants on the factors that they believed influence policy decisions in literacy education. Participants were selected because they had significantly influenced, or had attempted to influence, policy decisions in literacy at either the national or state level. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven key informants and four nominated informants. An inductive data analysis revealed five broad domains that addressed the participants’ perspective on factors of influence: literacy professionals, public sentiment, selected policy participants, conservative voices, and research.