学习和学习策略量表(lassi)的重测信度:新证据

Lamont A. Flowers
{"title":"学习和学习策略量表(lassi)的重测信度:新证据","authors":"Lamont A. Flowers","doi":"10.1080/19388070309558399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports the results of a test‐retest reliability study that was conducted to determine the extent to which scale scores obtained from the first edition of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) were stable and provided consistent measures of students’ knowledge and use of study skills. When compared to an earlier test‐retest reliability study (Weinstein, 1987), the findings from the present study suggested that LASSI scale scores might yield inconsistent or unstable scores for at‐risk students.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"43 1","pages":"31 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070309558399","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test‐retest reliability of the learning and study strategies inventory (lassi): New evidence\",\"authors\":\"Lamont A. Flowers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070309558399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article reports the results of a test‐retest reliability study that was conducted to determine the extent to which scale scores obtained from the first edition of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) were stable and provided consistent measures of students’ knowledge and use of study skills. When compared to an earlier test‐retest reliability study (Weinstein, 1987), the findings from the present study suggested that LASSI scale scores might yield inconsistent or unstable scores for at‐risk students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070309558399\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070309558399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070309558399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

摘要本文报告了一项测试-重测信度研究的结果,该研究旨在确定第一版学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)的量表分数在多大程度上是稳定的,并提供了学生知识和学习技能使用的一致衡量标准。与早期的重测信度研究(Weinstein, 1987)相比,本研究的结果表明,LASSI量表得分可能会对有风险的学生产生不一致或不稳定的分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test‐retest reliability of the learning and study strategies inventory (lassi): New evidence
Abstract This article reports the results of a test‐retest reliability study that was conducted to determine the extent to which scale scores obtained from the first edition of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) were stable and provided consistent measures of students’ knowledge and use of study skills. When compared to an earlier test‐retest reliability study (Weinstein, 1987), the findings from the present study suggested that LASSI scale scores might yield inconsistent or unstable scores for at‐risk students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信