如何教挣扎(和非挣扎)的小学读者:职前教师知识分析

Ann M. Duffy, T. Atkinson
{"title":"如何教挣扎(和非挣扎)的小学读者:职前教师知识分析","authors":"Ann M. Duffy, T. Atkinson","doi":"10.1080/19388070109558359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this research was to describe elementary school preservice teachers* beliefs, understandings, and instruction of struggling and non‐struggling readers as they evolved over time in two university reading education courses with a field component. Using a qualitative content analysis, we analyzed the assignments of 22 preservice teachers across one year of their teacher education program. We found that, throughout the year, preservice teachers improved in their abilities to integrate their personal, practical, and professional knowledges to inform their reading instruction. Their misunderstandings surrounding reading instruction decreased while their abilities to examine reading instruction critically and estimations of their preparedness to teach struggling readers increased. Preservice teachers’ views about the value of assessing students’ reading proficiency became increasingly more positive as did perceptions about the importance of tutoring struggling readers. Finally, implications are made to suggest how university reading education courses may support the learning and development of future preservice teachers.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"41 1","pages":"102 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070109558359","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning to teach struggling (and non‐struggling) elementary school readers: An analysis of preservice teachers’ knowledges\",\"authors\":\"Ann M. Duffy, T. Atkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070109558359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this research was to describe elementary school preservice teachers* beliefs, understandings, and instruction of struggling and non‐struggling readers as they evolved over time in two university reading education courses with a field component. Using a qualitative content analysis, we analyzed the assignments of 22 preservice teachers across one year of their teacher education program. We found that, throughout the year, preservice teachers improved in their abilities to integrate their personal, practical, and professional knowledges to inform their reading instruction. Their misunderstandings surrounding reading instruction decreased while their abilities to examine reading instruction critically and estimations of their preparedness to teach struggling readers increased. Preservice teachers’ views about the value of assessing students’ reading proficiency became increasingly more positive as did perceptions about the importance of tutoring struggling readers. Finally, implications are made to suggest how university reading education courses may support the learning and development of future preservice teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070109558359\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是描述小学职前教师在两门具有实地成分的大学阅读教育课程中对困难读者和非困难读者的信念、理解和指导。使用定性内容分析,我们分析了22名职前教师在一年的教师教育计划中的作业。我们发现,在这一年中,职前教师将个人、实践和专业知识整合到阅读教学中的能力有所提高。他们对阅读教学的误解减少了,而他们批判性地审视阅读教学的能力和对他们教困难读者的准备程度的估计增加了。职前教师对评估学生阅读能力的价值的看法越来越积极,对辅导阅读困难的重要性的看法也越来越积极。最后,提出大学阅读教育课程如何支持未来职前教师的学习和发展的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning to teach struggling (and non‐struggling) elementary school readers: An analysis of preservice teachers’ knowledges
Abstract The purpose of this research was to describe elementary school preservice teachers* beliefs, understandings, and instruction of struggling and non‐struggling readers as they evolved over time in two university reading education courses with a field component. Using a qualitative content analysis, we analyzed the assignments of 22 preservice teachers across one year of their teacher education program. We found that, throughout the year, preservice teachers improved in their abilities to integrate their personal, practical, and professional knowledges to inform their reading instruction. Their misunderstandings surrounding reading instruction decreased while their abilities to examine reading instruction critically and estimations of their preparedness to teach struggling readers increased. Preservice teachers’ views about the value of assessing students’ reading proficiency became increasingly more positive as did perceptions about the importance of tutoring struggling readers. Finally, implications are made to suggest how university reading education courses may support the learning and development of future preservice teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信