思考大与小或拯救鲸鱼的意义:四年级和五年级课堂中叙述性和说明性文本的讨论

P. Scharer, Barbara A. Lehman, Donna Peters
{"title":"思考大与小或拯救鲸鱼的意义:四年级和五年级课堂中叙述性和说明性文本的讨论","authors":"P. Scharer, Barbara A. Lehman, Donna Peters","doi":"10.1080/19388070109558352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigated the nature of book discussions about expository and narrative texts in fourth‐ and fifth‐grade classrooms. Eight teachers discussed one narrative (Amos & Boris, Steig, 1971) and one expository (Whales, Simon, 1989) picture book for a total of 16 small group discussions, which were audiotaped and transcribed. Literary and informational topics were discussed most and were more evenly balanced during the eight discussions of Amos & Boris while informational topics emerged nearly twice as often during Whales discussions. Illustrations and intertextual connections appeared as topics on a much smaller scale. Analysis of talk patterns revealed teacher dominance during discussion through a high percentage of questions asked, consistent initiation and control of the topics, and teacher repetitions of student responses or teacher questions. Teachers’ questions posed during the expository discussion were more literal than for the narrative text. Student initiations tended to occur when provided the opportunity to write responses to their reading and share during discussions.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"40 1","pages":"297 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070109558352","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pondering the significance of big and little or saving the whales: Discussions of narrative and expository text in fourth‐ and fifth‐grade classrooms\",\"authors\":\"P. Scharer, Barbara A. Lehman, Donna Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388070109558352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study investigated the nature of book discussions about expository and narrative texts in fourth‐ and fifth‐grade classrooms. Eight teachers discussed one narrative (Amos & Boris, Steig, 1971) and one expository (Whales, Simon, 1989) picture book for a total of 16 small group discussions, which were audiotaped and transcribed. Literary and informational topics were discussed most and were more evenly balanced during the eight discussions of Amos & Boris while informational topics emerged nearly twice as often during Whales discussions. Illustrations and intertextual connections appeared as topics on a much smaller scale. Analysis of talk patterns revealed teacher dominance during discussion through a high percentage of questions asked, consistent initiation and control of the topics, and teacher repetitions of student responses or teacher questions. Teachers’ questions posed during the expository discussion were more literal than for the narrative text. Student initiations tended to occur when provided the opportunity to write responses to their reading and share during discussions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"297 - 314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070109558352\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本研究调查了四年级和五年级课堂上关于说明文和叙事性文本的书籍讨论的性质。8位教师讨论了一本叙事性(Amos & Boris, Steig, 1971)和一本说说性(Whales, Simon, 1989)图画书,共进行了16次小组讨论,录音并转录。在Amos和Boris的8次讨论中,文学和信息话题被讨论得最多,而且更为均衡,而信息话题在鲸鱼讨论中出现的频率几乎是前者的两倍。插图和互文联系作为主题出现的规模要小得多。对谈话模式的分析显示,在讨论过程中,教师通过高比例的提问、始终如一的话题发起和控制,以及教师重复学生的回答或教师的问题,占据主导地位。教师在说明性讨论中提出的问题比叙事文本更字面化。当学生有机会写下对阅读的回应并在讨论中分享时,他们往往会发起活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pondering the significance of big and little or saving the whales: Discussions of narrative and expository text in fourth‐ and fifth‐grade classrooms
Abstract This study investigated the nature of book discussions about expository and narrative texts in fourth‐ and fifth‐grade classrooms. Eight teachers discussed one narrative (Amos & Boris, Steig, 1971) and one expository (Whales, Simon, 1989) picture book for a total of 16 small group discussions, which were audiotaped and transcribed. Literary and informational topics were discussed most and were more evenly balanced during the eight discussions of Amos & Boris while informational topics emerged nearly twice as often during Whales discussions. Illustrations and intertextual connections appeared as topics on a much smaller scale. Analysis of talk patterns revealed teacher dominance during discussion through a high percentage of questions asked, consistent initiation and control of the topics, and teacher repetitions of student responses or teacher questions. Teachers’ questions posed during the expository discussion were more literal than for the narrative text. Student initiations tended to occur when provided the opportunity to write responses to their reading and share during discussions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信