{"title":"三价和六价铬的健康土壤作用水平:与州和联邦标准的比较","authors":"D. Proctor, E. Shay, P. Scott","doi":"10.1080/15320389709383592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the Brownfields initiatives being enacted at both the state and federal levels, environmental regulatory agencies are developing health‐based screening or action levels to facilitate the reclamation of unused industrial properties. By the end of 1997, approximately 90% of the states will have either adopted federal values or developed their own non‐site‐specific action levels. These standards can be applied as default cleanup levels, or alternative remediation standards may be developed based on a site‐specific risk assessment. A state and federal survey of cleanup levels for hexavalent and trivalent chromium [Cr(VI) and Cr(III)] indicated a general concurrence of approaches (i.e., most states are using the USEPA standard risk assessment model with upper‐bound estimates of exposure and USEPA toxicity criteria), although the proposed values vary by as much as 5 orders of magnitude. To understand the variability and uncertainty in these levels, the USEPA Soil Screening Level (SSL) (1996a) equatio...","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15320389709383592","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health‐based soil action levels for trivalent and hexavalent chromium: A comparison with state and federal standards\",\"authors\":\"D. Proctor, E. Shay, P. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15320389709383592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As part of the Brownfields initiatives being enacted at both the state and federal levels, environmental regulatory agencies are developing health‐based screening or action levels to facilitate the reclamation of unused industrial properties. By the end of 1997, approximately 90% of the states will have either adopted federal values or developed their own non‐site‐specific action levels. These standards can be applied as default cleanup levels, or alternative remediation standards may be developed based on a site‐specific risk assessment. A state and federal survey of cleanup levels for hexavalent and trivalent chromium [Cr(VI) and Cr(III)] indicated a general concurrence of approaches (i.e., most states are using the USEPA standard risk assessment model with upper‐bound estimates of exposure and USEPA toxicity criteria), although the proposed values vary by as much as 5 orders of magnitude. To understand the variability and uncertainty in these levels, the USEPA Soil Screening Level (SSL) (1996a) equatio...\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15320389709383592\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15320389709383592\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15320389709383592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health‐based soil action levels for trivalent and hexavalent chromium: A comparison with state and federal standards
As part of the Brownfields initiatives being enacted at both the state and federal levels, environmental regulatory agencies are developing health‐based screening or action levels to facilitate the reclamation of unused industrial properties. By the end of 1997, approximately 90% of the states will have either adopted federal values or developed their own non‐site‐specific action levels. These standards can be applied as default cleanup levels, or alternative remediation standards may be developed based on a site‐specific risk assessment. A state and federal survey of cleanup levels for hexavalent and trivalent chromium [Cr(VI) and Cr(III)] indicated a general concurrence of approaches (i.e., most states are using the USEPA standard risk assessment model with upper‐bound estimates of exposure and USEPA toxicity criteria), although the proposed values vary by as much as 5 orders of magnitude. To understand the variability and uncertainty in these levels, the USEPA Soil Screening Level (SSL) (1996a) equatio...
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.