论公共与社区考古中的案例研究方法

IF 0.8 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
P. Gould
{"title":"论公共与社区考古中的案例研究方法","authors":"P. Gould","doi":"10.1080/14655187.2016.1199942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to initiate a conversation about methodology in public and community archaeology through an examination of the use of case studies. Case studies enable the exploration of situations that are, by their nature, not easily reduced to statistical data. The challenge is that unless they are carefully structured, case studies may contribute little beyond anecdote to the field. Other disciplines that rely on case studies have addressed the methodological challenges aggressively. This paper explores these issues in four sections: First, the rationale for methodology in public archaeology is examined. Second, actual practice—through analysis of papers published in Public Archaeology and, to a limited degree, in the ‘grey literature’—is reviewed. Third, alternative case study methods, gleaned from diverse disciplines, are presented. Finally, the potential for method-based case study research is illustrated through an example of the use of one such method.","PeriodicalId":45023,"journal":{"name":"Public Archaeology","volume":"15 1","pages":"22 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2016.1199942","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Case: Method in Public and Community Archaeology\",\"authors\":\"P. Gould\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14655187.2016.1199942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to initiate a conversation about methodology in public and community archaeology through an examination of the use of case studies. Case studies enable the exploration of situations that are, by their nature, not easily reduced to statistical data. The challenge is that unless they are carefully structured, case studies may contribute little beyond anecdote to the field. Other disciplines that rely on case studies have addressed the methodological challenges aggressively. This paper explores these issues in four sections: First, the rationale for methodology in public archaeology is examined. Second, actual practice—through analysis of papers published in Public Archaeology and, to a limited degree, in the ‘grey literature’—is reviewed. Third, alternative case study methods, gleaned from diverse disciplines, are presented. Finally, the potential for method-based case study research is illustrated through an example of the use of one such method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2016.1199942\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1199942\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1199942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文旨在通过对案例研究的使用进行检查,发起关于公共和社区考古学方法论的对话。案例研究使人们能够探索那些本质上不容易简化为统计数据的情况。挑战在于,除非案例研究结构严谨,否则它们对该领域的贡献可能仅限于轶事。其他依赖于案例研究的学科已经积极地解决了方法论上的挑战。本文从四个部分探讨这些问题:首先,考察了公共考古学方法论的基本原理。其次,通过对《公共考古学》上发表的论文的分析,以及在一定程度上对“灰色文献”的分析,对实际实践进行了回顾。第三,介绍了从不同学科中收集的替代案例研究方法。最后,通过使用这种方法的一个例子说明了基于方法的案例研究的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Case: Method in Public and Community Archaeology
This paper seeks to initiate a conversation about methodology in public and community archaeology through an examination of the use of case studies. Case studies enable the exploration of situations that are, by their nature, not easily reduced to statistical data. The challenge is that unless they are carefully structured, case studies may contribute little beyond anecdote to the field. Other disciplines that rely on case studies have addressed the methodological challenges aggressively. This paper explores these issues in four sections: First, the rationale for methodology in public archaeology is examined. Second, actual practice—through analysis of papers published in Public Archaeology and, to a limited degree, in the ‘grey literature’—is reviewed. Third, alternative case study methods, gleaned from diverse disciplines, are presented. Finally, the potential for method-based case study research is illustrated through an example of the use of one such method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Archaeology
Public Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信