{"title":"是你问我的吗?《公共考古学就是你:对格里玛的回应及对公共考古学意义的广泛争论","authors":"Jaime Almansa Sánchez","doi":"10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the broader debate to (re)define public archaeology, Grima's (2016) paper calls for an archaeology embedded in public archaeology, thereby focusing on this avenue of expansion instead of its own development as a singular discipline. Not fully rejecting this idea, this short paper aims to situate the debate a step beyond, towards a slightly different approach. Employing a historiographical perspective, it is argued that complementary visions about public archaeology help to enrich the discipline.","PeriodicalId":45023,"journal":{"name":"Public Archaeology","volume":"15 1","pages":"141 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You of All People Ask Me? Public Archaeology is You: A Response to Grima and the Wider Debate on the Meaning of Public Archaeology\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Almansa Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the broader debate to (re)define public archaeology, Grima's (2016) paper calls for an archaeology embedded in public archaeology, thereby focusing on this avenue of expansion instead of its own development as a singular discipline. Not fully rejecting this idea, this short paper aims to situate the debate a step beyond, towards a slightly different approach. Employing a historiographical perspective, it is argued that complementary visions about public archaeology help to enrich the discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1264841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
You of All People Ask Me? Public Archaeology is You: A Response to Grima and the Wider Debate on the Meaning of Public Archaeology
Within the broader debate to (re)define public archaeology, Grima's (2016) paper calls for an archaeology embedded in public archaeology, thereby focusing on this avenue of expansion instead of its own development as a singular discipline. Not fully rejecting this idea, this short paper aims to situate the debate a step beyond, towards a slightly different approach. Employing a historiographical perspective, it is argued that complementary visions about public archaeology help to enrich the discipline.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
