L. Moody, Theresa M. Beckie, Charlene Long, Allison Edmonds, Stephanie Andrews
{"title":"评估安宁疗护长者及长者对死亡的准备程度","authors":"L. Moody, Theresa M. Beckie, Charlene Long, Allison Edmonds, Stephanie Andrews","doi":"10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Readiness for death may affect the quality of the death experience and influence response to treatments. The psychologic vulnerability of the dying person is a major focus of palliative care. Accurate assessment of readiness for death may lead to earlier and more appropriate interventions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised readiness for death instrument. Methods: Using a known groups technique and a cross-sectional study design, the revised instrument was administered to 52 elders in hospice care with a terminal diagnosis and 91 community dwelling adults without a terminal diagnosis. Results: Instrument content validity (Kappa = 0.96) was supported by three expert panelists who were hospice researchers. Principal components factor analysis explained 43% of the variance and partially supported the proposed four-factor structure of the revised 26-item instrument. Internal consistency was acceptable (.76). Discriminant validity was significant as assessed by an independent t-test between two contrast groups (t = 5.98, p = 0.000). The factor analysis, reliability testing, and qualitative analysis of items supported deletion of 2 items. Conclusions: Results indicated that the revised instrument has sound psychometric properties but further testing with a larger sample of hospice subjects is needed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]","PeriodicalId":77421,"journal":{"name":"The Hospice journal","volume":"77 1","pages":"49 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Readiness for Death in Hospice Elders and Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"L. Moody, Theresa M. Beckie, Charlene Long, Allison Edmonds, Stephanie Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background: Readiness for death may affect the quality of the death experience and influence response to treatments. The psychologic vulnerability of the dying person is a major focus of palliative care. Accurate assessment of readiness for death may lead to earlier and more appropriate interventions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised readiness for death instrument. Methods: Using a known groups technique and a cross-sectional study design, the revised instrument was administered to 52 elders in hospice care with a terminal diagnosis and 91 community dwelling adults without a terminal diagnosis. Results: Instrument content validity (Kappa = 0.96) was supported by three expert panelists who were hospice researchers. Principal components factor analysis explained 43% of the variance and partially supported the proposed four-factor structure of the revised 26-item instrument. Internal consistency was acceptable (.76). Discriminant validity was significant as assessed by an independent t-test between two contrast groups (t = 5.98, p = 0.000). The factor analysis, reliability testing, and qualitative analysis of items supported deletion of 2 items. Conclusions: Results indicated that the revised instrument has sound psychometric properties but further testing with a larger sample of hospice subjects is needed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]\",\"PeriodicalId\":77421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hospice journal\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hospice journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hospice journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
背景:死亡准备可能影响死亡体验的质量和对治疗的反应。临终者的心理脆弱性是姑息治疗的一个主要焦点。对死亡准备程度的准确评估可能导致更早和更适当的干预。目的:本研究的目的是评估修订后的死亡准备程度量表的心理测量特性。方法:采用已知的群体技术和横断面研究设计,对52名临终关怀老人和91名非临终诊断的社区居住成年人进行了改进的工具。结果:量表内容效度(Kappa = 0.96)得到三位安宁疗护研究专家小组成员的支持。主成分因子分析解释了43%的方差,并部分支持修订后的26项工具的拟议四因素结构。内部一致性可接受(0.76)。经独立t检验,两组间判别效度显著(t = 5.98, p = 0.000)。因子分析、信度检验、质性分析均支持删除2项。结论:修订后的量表具有良好的心理测量特性,但需要进一步以更大样本的安宁疗护被试来确认量表的因素结构。[文章副本收费,可从霍沃斯文件递送服务:1-800-342-9678。电子邮件地址:getinfo@haworthpressinc.com
Assessing Readiness for Death in Hospice Elders and Older Adults
ABSTRACT Background: Readiness for death may affect the quality of the death experience and influence response to treatments. The psychologic vulnerability of the dying person is a major focus of palliative care. Accurate assessment of readiness for death may lead to earlier and more appropriate interventions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised readiness for death instrument. Methods: Using a known groups technique and a cross-sectional study design, the revised instrument was administered to 52 elders in hospice care with a terminal diagnosis and 91 community dwelling adults without a terminal diagnosis. Results: Instrument content validity (Kappa = 0.96) was supported by three expert panelists who were hospice researchers. Principal components factor analysis explained 43% of the variance and partially supported the proposed four-factor structure of the revised 26-item instrument. Internal consistency was acceptable (.76). Discriminant validity was significant as assessed by an independent t-test between two contrast groups (t = 5.98, p = 0.000). The factor analysis, reliability testing, and qualitative analysis of items supported deletion of 2 items. Conclusions: Results indicated that the revised instrument has sound psychometric properties but further testing with a larger sample of hospice subjects is needed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]