D. Wilkie, Janice Kampbell, S. Cutshall, Heather Halabisky, Hilda Harmon, Linda P. Johnson, Lynn Weinacht, Mark Rake-Marona
{"title":"按摩对癌症疼痛患者疼痛强度、镇痛药和生活质量的影响:一项在安宁疗护内进行的随机临床试验的初步研究","authors":"D. Wilkie, Janice Kampbell, S. Cutshall, Heather Halabisky, Hilda Harmon, Linda P. Johnson, Lynn Weinacht, Mark Rake-Marona","doi":"10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aims: In a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT), we examined the effects of four massages on pain intensity, prescribed IM morphine equivalent doses (IMMSEQ), hospital admissions, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Of 173 referred patients, 29 (14 control, 15 massage) completed this pilot study. Subjects were 69% male and aged 63 years on average. Licensed therapists administered four, twice-weekly massages. Baseline and outcome measurements were obtained by other team members before the first and after the fourth massages. Results: Pain intensity, pulse rate, and respiratory rate were significantly reduced immediately after the massages. At study entry, the massage group reported higher pain intensity (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.1) which decreased by 42% (1.4 ± 1.5) compared to a 25% reduction in the control group (1.2 ± 1.3) (p > .05). IMMSEQ doses were stable or decreased for eight patients in each group and increased for seven massage and six control group patients. One massage group and two control group patients were hospitalized. All initial QoL scores were higher in the massage group than in the control group, but only current QoL was statistically significant. Both groups reported improved global QoL. The control group reported slight improvement in current QoL and satisfaction with QoL whereas these two aspects of QoL declined in the massage group even though their average QoL scores were higher than the control group at the end of the study. Conclusions: We demonstrated feasibility of conducting an RCCT in which we systematically implemented massage as a nonpharmacologic comfort therapy along with our usual hospice care. The massage intervention produced immediate relaxation and pain relief effects. A power analysis based on trends in the longer-term effects indicate that a study with 80 subjects per group is likely to detect statistically significant effects of usual hospice care with twice-weekly massage therapy sessions on pain intensity, analgesic dosages, and quality of life. Lessons we learned from conducting this pilot study are being used to improve documentation of our hospice program outcomes and to plan a definitive study. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]","PeriodicalId":77421,"journal":{"name":"The Hospice journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"31 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956","citationCount":"132","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Massage on Pain Intensity, Analgesics and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer Pain: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial Conducted Within Hospice Care Delivery\",\"authors\":\"D. Wilkie, Janice Kampbell, S. Cutshall, Heather Halabisky, Hilda Harmon, Linda P. Johnson, Lynn Weinacht, Mark Rake-Marona\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Aims: In a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT), we examined the effects of four massages on pain intensity, prescribed IM morphine equivalent doses (IMMSEQ), hospital admissions, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Of 173 referred patients, 29 (14 control, 15 massage) completed this pilot study. Subjects were 69% male and aged 63 years on average. Licensed therapists administered four, twice-weekly massages. Baseline and outcome measurements were obtained by other team members before the first and after the fourth massages. Results: Pain intensity, pulse rate, and respiratory rate were significantly reduced immediately after the massages. At study entry, the massage group reported higher pain intensity (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.1) which decreased by 42% (1.4 ± 1.5) compared to a 25% reduction in the control group (1.2 ± 1.3) (p > .05). IMMSEQ doses were stable or decreased for eight patients in each group and increased for seven massage and six control group patients. One massage group and two control group patients were hospitalized. All initial QoL scores were higher in the massage group than in the control group, but only current QoL was statistically significant. Both groups reported improved global QoL. The control group reported slight improvement in current QoL and satisfaction with QoL whereas these two aspects of QoL declined in the massage group even though their average QoL scores were higher than the control group at the end of the study. Conclusions: We demonstrated feasibility of conducting an RCCT in which we systematically implemented massage as a nonpharmacologic comfort therapy along with our usual hospice care. The massage intervention produced immediate relaxation and pain relief effects. A power analysis based on trends in the longer-term effects indicate that a study with 80 subjects per group is likely to detect statistically significant effects of usual hospice care with twice-weekly massage therapy sessions on pain intensity, analgesic dosages, and quality of life. Lessons we learned from conducting this pilot study are being used to improve documentation of our hospice program outcomes and to plan a definitive study. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]\",\"PeriodicalId\":77421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hospice journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956\",\"citationCount\":\"132\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hospice journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hospice journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969X.2000.11882956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 132
摘要
摘要目的:在一项随机对照临床试验(RCCT)中,我们研究了四种按摩对疼痛强度、处方吗啡当量剂量(IMMSEQ)、住院率和生活质量(QoL)的影响。方法:173例转诊患者中,29例(对照组14例,按摩组15例)完成本初步研究。受试者69%为男性,平均年龄63岁。有执照的治疗师每周进行两次按摩。基线和结果测量由其他团队成员在第一次按摩前和第四次按摩后获得。结果:按摩后疼痛强度、脉搏率、呼吸率均明显降低。在研究开始时,按摩组报告了更高的疼痛强度(2.4±2.8 vs. 1.6±2.1),与对照组(1.2±1.3)减少25% (p < 0.05)相比,疼痛强度降低了42%(1.4±1.5)。每组8例患者的IMMSEQ剂量稳定或减少,按摩组7例患者和对照组6例患者的IMMSEQ剂量增加。推拿组1例,对照组2例。按摩组的所有初始生活质量评分均高于对照组,但只有当前生活质量有统计学意义。两组都报告了总体生活质量的改善。对照组在目前的生活质量和对生活质量的满意度方面略有改善,而按摩组在生活质量的这两个方面有所下降,尽管他们的平均生活质量评分在研究结束时高于对照组。结论:我们证明了进行RCCT的可行性,在RCCT中,我们系统地将按摩作为一种非药物舒适疗法与我们通常的临终关怀一起实施。按摩干预产生了立即放松和缓解疼痛的效果。一项基于长期效果趋势的功效分析表明,一项每组80名受试者的研究可能会发现,每周两次的常规临终关怀按摩治疗对疼痛强度、止痛剂剂量和生活质量的影响具有统计学意义。我们从这项初步研究中学到的经验,正被用来改善我们安宁疗护计划结果的文件,并计划一项明确的研究。[文章副本收费,可从霍沃斯文件递送服务:1-800-342-9678。电子邮件地址:getinfo@haworthpressinc.com
Effects of Massage on Pain Intensity, Analgesics and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer Pain: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial Conducted Within Hospice Care Delivery
ABSTRACT Aims: In a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT), we examined the effects of four massages on pain intensity, prescribed IM morphine equivalent doses (IMMSEQ), hospital admissions, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Of 173 referred patients, 29 (14 control, 15 massage) completed this pilot study. Subjects were 69% male and aged 63 years on average. Licensed therapists administered four, twice-weekly massages. Baseline and outcome measurements were obtained by other team members before the first and after the fourth massages. Results: Pain intensity, pulse rate, and respiratory rate were significantly reduced immediately after the massages. At study entry, the massage group reported higher pain intensity (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.1) which decreased by 42% (1.4 ± 1.5) compared to a 25% reduction in the control group (1.2 ± 1.3) (p > .05). IMMSEQ doses were stable or decreased for eight patients in each group and increased for seven massage and six control group patients. One massage group and two control group patients were hospitalized. All initial QoL scores were higher in the massage group than in the control group, but only current QoL was statistically significant. Both groups reported improved global QoL. The control group reported slight improvement in current QoL and satisfaction with QoL whereas these two aspects of QoL declined in the massage group even though their average QoL scores were higher than the control group at the end of the study. Conclusions: We demonstrated feasibility of conducting an RCCT in which we systematically implemented massage as a nonpharmacologic comfort therapy along with our usual hospice care. The massage intervention produced immediate relaxation and pain relief effects. A power analysis based on trends in the longer-term effects indicate that a study with 80 subjects per group is likely to detect statistically significant effects of usual hospice care with twice-weekly massage therapy sessions on pain intensity, analgesic dosages, and quality of life. Lessons we learned from conducting this pilot study are being used to improve documentation of our hospice program outcomes and to plan a definitive study. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address: getinfo@haworthpressinc.com ]