对儿童性虐待的关注是否需要进行扩展评估?1294名儿童虐待专业人员的看法

Javonda Williams, Debra Nelson-Gardell, K. Faller, Linda Cordisco-Steele, A. Tishelman
{"title":"对儿童性虐待的关注是否需要进行扩展评估?1294名儿童虐待专业人员的看法","authors":"Javonda Williams, Debra Nelson-Gardell, K. Faller, Linda Cordisco-Steele, A. Tishelman","doi":"10.1080/1936928X.2013.763504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports the findings from an online survey of child maltreatment professionals about the appropriateness of extended assessments when maltreatment concerns cannot be resolved in a single interview. Respondents practiced in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 3 territories, and reported mean years of experience about 15 years. The overwhelming majority of respondents saw the need for extended assessments and endorsed a wide range of child and context characteristics appropriate for extended assessments, the most common being cases where children denied abuse despite persuasive evidence to the contrary, cases with multiple types of maltreatment, cases with preschool age children, and cases with children with disabilities. On average about a fourth of the children seen in their work would benefit from an extended assessment. More than one fourth of respondents actually conducted extended assessments. Respondents however identified barriers and drawbacks to extended assessments, including lack of funding, lack of training, and concerns about contaminating the child's account.","PeriodicalId":89974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic social work","volume":"3 1","pages":"105 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1936928X.2013.763504","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There a Place for Extended Assessments For Evaluating Concerns about Child Sexual Abuse? Perceptions of 1,294 Child Maltreatment Professionals\",\"authors\":\"Javonda Williams, Debra Nelson-Gardell, K. Faller, Linda Cordisco-Steele, A. Tishelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1936928X.2013.763504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reports the findings from an online survey of child maltreatment professionals about the appropriateness of extended assessments when maltreatment concerns cannot be resolved in a single interview. Respondents practiced in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 3 territories, and reported mean years of experience about 15 years. The overwhelming majority of respondents saw the need for extended assessments and endorsed a wide range of child and context characteristics appropriate for extended assessments, the most common being cases where children denied abuse despite persuasive evidence to the contrary, cases with multiple types of maltreatment, cases with preschool age children, and cases with children with disabilities. On average about a fourth of the children seen in their work would benefit from an extended assessment. More than one fourth of respondents actually conducted extended assessments. Respondents however identified barriers and drawbacks to extended assessments, including lack of funding, lack of training, and concerns about contaminating the child's account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic social work\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"105 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1936928X.2013.763504\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2013.763504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2013.763504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文报告了一项针对儿童虐待专业人员的在线调查结果,该调查是关于当虐待问题无法在一次访谈中解决时,扩展评估的适当性。受访者在所有50个州、哥伦比亚特区和3个地区执业,报告的平均经验年约为15年。绝大多数答复者认为有必要进行扩展评估,并赞同适用于扩展评估的广泛的儿童和环境特征,最常见的是尽管有令人信服的相反证据,但儿童否认受到虐待的案件、多种类型的虐待案件、学龄前儿童案件和残疾儿童案件。平均约有四分之一的孩子在他们的工作中会受益于延长的评估。超过四分之一的受访者实际上进行了扩展评估。然而,答复者指出了扩展评估的障碍和缺点,包括缺乏资金、缺乏培训以及担心污染儿童账户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is There a Place for Extended Assessments For Evaluating Concerns about Child Sexual Abuse? Perceptions of 1,294 Child Maltreatment Professionals
This article reports the findings from an online survey of child maltreatment professionals about the appropriateness of extended assessments when maltreatment concerns cannot be resolved in a single interview. Respondents practiced in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 3 territories, and reported mean years of experience about 15 years. The overwhelming majority of respondents saw the need for extended assessments and endorsed a wide range of child and context characteristics appropriate for extended assessments, the most common being cases where children denied abuse despite persuasive evidence to the contrary, cases with multiple types of maltreatment, cases with preschool age children, and cases with children with disabilities. On average about a fourth of the children seen in their work would benefit from an extended assessment. More than one fourth of respondents actually conducted extended assessments. Respondents however identified barriers and drawbacks to extended assessments, including lack of funding, lack of training, and concerns about contaminating the child's account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信