“人类规模”的经济发展:密苏里州的创新

M. Sherraden, Betsy Slosar, A. Chastain, Joseph Squillace
{"title":"“人类规模”的经济发展:密苏里州的创新","authors":"M. Sherraden, Betsy Slosar, A. Chastain, Joseph Squillace","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Traditional approaches to community development have bypassed many poor communities. This paper reports on findings from a statewide survey of 171 organizations in Missouri about innovative approaches to community economic development (CED). These “human‐sized” CED approaches include homeownership, microenterprise, saving, and neighborhood development. Although enthusiastic, respondents identify challenges to service delivery, including funding, reaching low‐income families, staff recruitment and training, economic education, building partnerships, serving rural areas, and ensuring that the poor have a voice in their own development. Accordingly, recommendations for enhancing CED include increases in support to assist communities and households generate greater wealth, community participation, partnerships among public and private for‐profit and nonprofit entities, access to information and education on CED, public awareness, and attention to rural issues.","PeriodicalId":82727,"journal":{"name":"Social thought","volume":"22 1","pages":"117 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Human‐sized” economic development: Innovations in Missouri\",\"authors\":\"M. Sherraden, Betsy Slosar, A. Chastain, Joseph Squillace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Traditional approaches to community development have bypassed many poor communities. This paper reports on findings from a statewide survey of 171 organizations in Missouri about innovative approaches to community economic development (CED). These “human‐sized” CED approaches include homeownership, microenterprise, saving, and neighborhood development. Although enthusiastic, respondents identify challenges to service delivery, including funding, reaching low‐income families, staff recruitment and training, economic education, building partnerships, serving rural areas, and ensuring that the poor have a voice in their own development. Accordingly, recommendations for enhancing CED include increases in support to assist communities and households generate greater wealth, community participation, partnerships among public and private for‐profit and nonprofit entities, access to information and education on CED, public awareness, and attention to rural issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social thought\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传统的社区发展方法绕过了许多贫穷社区。本文报告了对密苏里州171个组织进行的关于社区经济发展(CED)创新方法的全州调查结果。这些“人性化”的CED方法包括住房所有权、微型企业、储蓄和社区发展。尽管充满热情,但受访者指出了服务提供面临的挑战,包括资金、接触低收入家庭、员工招聘和培训、经济教育、建立伙伴关系、为农村地区服务以及确保穷人在自身发展中拥有发言权。因此,加强经济发展的建议包括增加支持,帮助社区和家庭创造更多财富,社区参与,公私盈利和非营利实体之间的伙伴关系,获得有关经济发展的信息和教育,公众意识,以及对农村问题的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Human‐sized” economic development: Innovations in Missouri
Summary Traditional approaches to community development have bypassed many poor communities. This paper reports on findings from a statewide survey of 171 organizations in Missouri about innovative approaches to community economic development (CED). These “human‐sized” CED approaches include homeownership, microenterprise, saving, and neighborhood development. Although enthusiastic, respondents identify challenges to service delivery, including funding, reaching low‐income families, staff recruitment and training, economic education, building partnerships, serving rural areas, and ensuring that the poor have a voice in their own development. Accordingly, recommendations for enhancing CED include increases in support to assist communities and households generate greater wealth, community participation, partnerships among public and private for‐profit and nonprofit entities, access to information and education on CED, public awareness, and attention to rural issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信