M. Sherraden, Betsy Slosar, A. Chastain, Joseph Squillace
{"title":"“人类规模”的经济发展:密苏里州的创新","authors":"M. Sherraden, Betsy Slosar, A. Chastain, Joseph Squillace","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Traditional approaches to community development have bypassed many poor communities. This paper reports on findings from a statewide survey of 171 organizations in Missouri about innovative approaches to community economic development (CED). These “human‐sized” CED approaches include homeownership, microenterprise, saving, and neighborhood development. Although enthusiastic, respondents identify challenges to service delivery, including funding, reaching low‐income families, staff recruitment and training, economic education, building partnerships, serving rural areas, and ensuring that the poor have a voice in their own development. Accordingly, recommendations for enhancing CED include increases in support to assist communities and households generate greater wealth, community participation, partnerships among public and private for‐profit and nonprofit entities, access to information and education on CED, public awareness, and attention to rural issues.","PeriodicalId":82727,"journal":{"name":"Social thought","volume":"22 1","pages":"117 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Human‐sized” economic development: Innovations in Missouri\",\"authors\":\"M. Sherraden, Betsy Slosar, A. Chastain, Joseph Squillace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Traditional approaches to community development have bypassed many poor communities. This paper reports on findings from a statewide survey of 171 organizations in Missouri about innovative approaches to community economic development (CED). These “human‐sized” CED approaches include homeownership, microenterprise, saving, and neighborhood development. Although enthusiastic, respondents identify challenges to service delivery, including funding, reaching low‐income families, staff recruitment and training, economic education, building partnerships, serving rural areas, and ensuring that the poor have a voice in their own development. Accordingly, recommendations for enhancing CED include increases in support to assist communities and households generate greater wealth, community participation, partnerships among public and private for‐profit and nonprofit entities, access to information and education on CED, public awareness, and attention to rural issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social thought\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Human‐sized” economic development: Innovations in Missouri
Summary Traditional approaches to community development have bypassed many poor communities. This paper reports on findings from a statewide survey of 171 organizations in Missouri about innovative approaches to community economic development (CED). These “human‐sized” CED approaches include homeownership, microenterprise, saving, and neighborhood development. Although enthusiastic, respondents identify challenges to service delivery, including funding, reaching low‐income families, staff recruitment and training, economic education, building partnerships, serving rural areas, and ensuring that the poor have a voice in their own development. Accordingly, recommendations for enhancing CED include increases in support to assist communities and households generate greater wealth, community participation, partnerships among public and private for‐profit and nonprofit entities, access to information and education on CED, public awareness, and attention to rural issues.