在调度过程中按活动类型评估计划决策

Tomás Ruiz, M. Roorda
{"title":"在调度过程中按活动类型评估计划决策","authors":"Tomás Ruiz, M. Roorda","doi":"10.1080/18128602.2010.520276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing activity-based models still make assumptions about scheduling decision processes that are not well-informed by empirical evidence. In this article, a step forward is taken to better understand the activity-scheduling process and to improve activity-based models. In particular, different planning decision mechanisms depending on several activity type classifications are explored. First, models describing the planning of several aggregate activity types are considered. For these activities, three planning decisions are studied: location, planning time horizon and rescheduling. The ‘with whom’ planning decision is also studied when subtypes of recreational/entertainment activities are investigated in depth. Significant differences are found in modelling results for each activity type and subtype and each planning decision. These results confirm the existence of different mechanisms underlying the activity-travel decision process when activity types and subtypes are considered. Important conclusions related to the improvement of microsimulation models are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":49416,"journal":{"name":"Transportmetrica","volume":"7 1","pages":"417 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18128602.2010.520276","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing planning decisions by activity type during the scheduling process\",\"authors\":\"Tomás Ruiz, M. Roorda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18128602.2010.520276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing activity-based models still make assumptions about scheduling decision processes that are not well-informed by empirical evidence. In this article, a step forward is taken to better understand the activity-scheduling process and to improve activity-based models. In particular, different planning decision mechanisms depending on several activity type classifications are explored. First, models describing the planning of several aggregate activity types are considered. For these activities, three planning decisions are studied: location, planning time horizon and rescheduling. The ‘with whom’ planning decision is also studied when subtypes of recreational/entertainment activities are investigated in depth. Significant differences are found in modelling results for each activity type and subtype and each planning decision. These results confirm the existence of different mechanisms underlying the activity-travel decision process when activity types and subtypes are considered. Important conclusions related to the improvement of microsimulation models are highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportmetrica\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"417 - 442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18128602.2010.520276\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportmetrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.520276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportmetrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.520276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

现有的基于活动的模型仍然对调度决策过程做出假设,这些假设没有充分的经验证据。在本文中,我们向前迈进了一步,以便更好地理解活动调度流程并改进基于活动的模型。特别地,根据不同的活动类型分类探讨了不同的规划决策机制。首先,考虑了描述几种聚合活动类型规划的模型。对于这些活动,研究了三种规划决策:地点、规划时间范围和重新安排。在深入调查休闲/娱乐活动的亚型时,还研究了“与谁一起”的规划决策。每个活动类型和子类型以及每个规划决策的建模结果存在显著差异。这些结果证实,当考虑活动类型和子类型时,存在不同的活动-旅行决策过程机制。强调了与改进微观模拟模型有关的重要结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing planning decisions by activity type during the scheduling process
Existing activity-based models still make assumptions about scheduling decision processes that are not well-informed by empirical evidence. In this article, a step forward is taken to better understand the activity-scheduling process and to improve activity-based models. In particular, different planning decision mechanisms depending on several activity type classifications are explored. First, models describing the planning of several aggregate activity types are considered. For these activities, three planning decisions are studied: location, planning time horizon and rescheduling. The ‘with whom’ planning decision is also studied when subtypes of recreational/entertainment activities are investigated in depth. Significant differences are found in modelling results for each activity type and subtype and each planning decision. These results confirm the existence of different mechanisms underlying the activity-travel decision process when activity types and subtypes are considered. Important conclusions related to the improvement of microsimulation models are highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportmetrica
Transportmetrica 工程技术-运输科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信