{"title":"实施意图减少农村人口单用车使用的证据:遵守指示的调节效应","authors":"C. Armitage, J. Reid, C. Spencer","doi":"10.1080/18128602.2010.505591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementation intentions have successfully changed a range of behaviours, but remain relatively untested in populations that might be less compliant with instructions than students. Four hundred and fifteen rural dwellers were randomly allocated to receive questionnaires only or a questionnaire furnished with an implementation intention instruction. Three hundred and fifty-two were successfully contacted again and provided follow-up data. The main outcome measure was single-occupancy car use; theory of planned behaviour variables were used as secondary outcome measures. Findings revealed that, across the full sample, implementation intentions successfully arrested an increase in single-occupancy car use, F(1, 365) = 4.62, p < 0.05, = 0.01. Compliance with the instructions was low (25%) and significantly affected the findings: Whereas the single-occupancy car use of compliers significantly decreased, F(1, 51) = 7.39, p < 0.01, = 0.13, the single-occupancy car use of non-compliers significantly increased, F(1, 155) = 12.14, p < 0.01, = 0.07. Non-compliers were significantly less motivated to change their behaviour at baseline, F(5, 179) = 6.11, p < 0.01, = 0.15. The findings provide support for the use of implementation intentions to promote pro-environmental behaviour in a rural population, but further research into the causes and consequences of non-compliance is required.","PeriodicalId":49416,"journal":{"name":"Transportmetrica","volume":"7 1","pages":"455 - 466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18128602.2010.505591","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence that implementation intentions reduce single-occupancy car use in a rural population: moderating effects of compliance with instructions\",\"authors\":\"C. Armitage, J. Reid, C. Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18128602.2010.505591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Implementation intentions have successfully changed a range of behaviours, but remain relatively untested in populations that might be less compliant with instructions than students. Four hundred and fifteen rural dwellers were randomly allocated to receive questionnaires only or a questionnaire furnished with an implementation intention instruction. Three hundred and fifty-two were successfully contacted again and provided follow-up data. The main outcome measure was single-occupancy car use; theory of planned behaviour variables were used as secondary outcome measures. Findings revealed that, across the full sample, implementation intentions successfully arrested an increase in single-occupancy car use, F(1, 365) = 4.62, p < 0.05, = 0.01. Compliance with the instructions was low (25%) and significantly affected the findings: Whereas the single-occupancy car use of compliers significantly decreased, F(1, 51) = 7.39, p < 0.01, = 0.13, the single-occupancy car use of non-compliers significantly increased, F(1, 155) = 12.14, p < 0.01, = 0.07. Non-compliers were significantly less motivated to change their behaviour at baseline, F(5, 179) = 6.11, p < 0.01, = 0.15. The findings provide support for the use of implementation intentions to promote pro-environmental behaviour in a rural population, but further research into the causes and consequences of non-compliance is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportmetrica\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"455 - 466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18128602.2010.505591\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportmetrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.505591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportmetrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.505591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
实施意图已经成功地改变了一系列行为,但在可能比学生更不遵守指令的人群中,相对来说还没有经过测试。随机分配415名农村居民只接受问卷调查,或接受附有实施意向说明的问卷调查。352人再次成功联系,并提供了后续数据。主要结局指标为单人用车;计划行为理论变量被用作次要结果测量。结果显示,在整个样本中,实施意图成功地阻止了单人车使用的增加,F(1,365) = 4.62, p < 0.05, = 0.01。对指令的依从性较低(25%),显著影响了调查结果:检录者的单座用车使用率显著降低,F(1,51) = 7.39, p < 0.01, = 0.13;非检录者的单座用车使用率显著增加,F(1,155) = 12.14, p < 0.01, = 0.07。非合规者在基线时改变其行为的动机明显较低,F(5,179) = 6.11, p < 0.01, = 0.15。调查结果支持使用实施意向来促进农村人口的环保行为,但需要进一步研究不遵守的原因和后果。
Evidence that implementation intentions reduce single-occupancy car use in a rural population: moderating effects of compliance with instructions
Implementation intentions have successfully changed a range of behaviours, but remain relatively untested in populations that might be less compliant with instructions than students. Four hundred and fifteen rural dwellers were randomly allocated to receive questionnaires only or a questionnaire furnished with an implementation intention instruction. Three hundred and fifty-two were successfully contacted again and provided follow-up data. The main outcome measure was single-occupancy car use; theory of planned behaviour variables were used as secondary outcome measures. Findings revealed that, across the full sample, implementation intentions successfully arrested an increase in single-occupancy car use, F(1, 365) = 4.62, p < 0.05, = 0.01. Compliance with the instructions was low (25%) and significantly affected the findings: Whereas the single-occupancy car use of compliers significantly decreased, F(1, 51) = 7.39, p < 0.01, = 0.13, the single-occupancy car use of non-compliers significantly increased, F(1, 155) = 12.14, p < 0.01, = 0.07. Non-compliers were significantly less motivated to change their behaviour at baseline, F(5, 179) = 6.11, p < 0.01, = 0.15. The findings provide support for the use of implementation intentions to promote pro-environmental behaviour in a rural population, but further research into the causes and consequences of non-compliance is required.