误解大众

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704

A. Gross

{"title":"误解大众","authors":"A. Gross","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A major contribution to rhetorical theory and an important tool of rhetorical criticism, Perelman’s distinction between particular audiences and the universal audience has been misconstrued by his critics and even by Perelman himself. Properly construed, the universal audience is focused on facts and truths and consists of all human beings in so far as they are rational; consequently, discourse addressed to it eschews proofs from character and emotion. In contrast, addresses to particular audiences focus on values; they embrace not only proofs reason, but also those from character and emotion.","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"22 1","pages":"290 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misunderstanding the Universal Audience\",\"authors\":\"A. Gross\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A major contribution to rhetorical theory and an important tool of rhetorical criticism, Perelman’s distinction between particular audiences and the universal audience has been misconstrued by his critics and even by Perelman himself. Properly construed, the universal audience is focused on facts and truths and consists of all human beings in so far as they are rational; consequently, discourse addressed to it eschews proofs from character and emotion. In contrast, addresses to particular audiences focus on values; they embrace not only proofs reason, but also those from character and emotion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"290 - 302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2019.1671704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

作为修辞学理论的重要贡献和修辞学批评的重要工具，佩雷尔曼对特定受众和普遍受众的区分一直被他的批评者甚至佩雷尔曼本人所误解。如果解释得当，大众关注的是事实和真理，包括所有理性的人;因此，对它的论述回避了来自性格和情感的证据。相比之下，针对特定受众的演讲侧重于价值观;他们不仅接受理性的证据，也接受来自性格和情感的证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Misunderstanding the Universal Audience

ABSTRACT A major contribution to rhetorical theory and an important tool of rhetorical criticism, Perelman’s distinction between particular audiences and the universal audience has been misconstrued by his critics and even by Perelman himself. Properly construed, the universal audience is focused on facts and truths and consists of all human beings in so far as they are rational; consequently, discourse addressed to it eschews proofs from character and emotion. In contrast, addresses to particular audiences focus on values; they embrace not only proofs reason, but also those from character and emotion.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量