反传统的想象与修辞批评的意义

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Timothy Barney
{"title":"反传统的想象与修辞批评的意义","authors":"Timothy Barney","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2017.1385251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This neoliberal project entailed shifting the social from the artificial to the natural, from the domain of the visible to that of the invisible, and from the domain of the beautiful to that of the sublime. In neoliberalism, we are met not so much with a conspiracy to protect the ineffable, but to assert, and indeed in some sense institute the ineffable. This cannot but be an attempt to overcome politics — not the least, democratic politics.","PeriodicalId":38049,"journal":{"name":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","volume":"20 1","pages":"325 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2017.1385251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Iconoclastic Imagination and the Meaning of Rhetorical Criticism\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Barney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15362426.2017.1385251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This neoliberal project entailed shifting the social from the artificial to the natural, from the domain of the visible to that of the invisible, and from the domain of the beautiful to that of the sublime. In neoliberalism, we are met not so much with a conspiracy to protect the ineffable, but to assert, and indeed in some sense institute the ineffable. This cannot but be an attempt to overcome politics — not the least, democratic politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"325 - 327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15362426.2017.1385251\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in the History of Rhetoric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2017.1385251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2017.1385251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个新自由主义项目需要将社会从人造的转向自然的,从可见的领域转向不可见的领域,从美丽的领域转向崇高的领域。在新自由主义中,我们遇到的与其说是保护不可言说之物的阴谋,不如说是维护不可言说之物的阴谋,实际上在某种意义上是建立不可言说之物的阴谋。这只能是一种克服政治——尤其是民主政治——的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Iconoclastic Imagination and the Meaning of Rhetorical Criticism
This neoliberal project entailed shifting the social from the artificial to the natural, from the domain of the visible to that of the invisible, and from the domain of the beautiful to that of the sublime. In neoliberalism, we are met not so much with a conspiracy to protect the ineffable, but to assert, and indeed in some sense institute the ineffable. This cannot but be an attempt to overcome politics — not the least, democratic politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信