宗教、启蒙运动与帝国:18世纪英国人对印度教的诠释

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Andrea Sangiacomo
{"title":"宗教、启蒙运动与帝国:18世纪英国人对印度教的诠释","authors":"Andrea Sangiacomo","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"771 - 773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Sangiacomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"771 - 773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

意向性结构,是个体本质的知识。因此,人们可能会想,斯宾诺莎是否真的会批评,而不是赞同非二元性的观点,因为它试图否认任何思维活动的基本结构(其意向性)。这些问题在目前的斯宾诺莎学术研究中很少被讨论,即使卡莱尔在这方面没有得出最终结论(这样的结论会被得出吗?),她的书的一大优点是,它把这些问题提到了桌面上,承认了它们的重要性,甚至可能提醒读者,是时候直面这些问题了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century
intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual History Review
Intellectual History Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信