{"title":"宗教、启蒙运动与帝国:18世纪英国人对印度教的诠释","authors":"Andrea Sangiacomo","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"771 - 773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Sangiacomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"771 - 773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2089968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Religion, Enlightenment and Empire: British Interpretations of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century
intentional structure, being a knowledge of individual essences. One might thus wonder whether Spinoza would not have actually criticized, rather than endorsed, the idea of nonduality for its attempt at denying what seems to be the fundamental structure of any thinking activity (its intentionality). These are issues that are rarely debated in current Spinoza scholarship, and even if Carlisle does not reach a final conclusion on this front (could such a conclusion ever be reached?) a great merit of her book is that it brings these questions to the table, acknowledges their importance, and perhaps even reminds readers that it is time they were faced head-on.