在病例对照数据中确定和可视化高危人群。

R. Marshall
{"title":"在病例对照数据中确定和可视化高危人群。","authors":"R. Marshall","doi":"10.1080/13595220152601819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Case-control research is often exploratory; to determine factors that increase risk. Often, regression methods are used to determine combinations of risk factors that predispose to excess risk. Recently, tree-based methods have also been proposed. Both have limitations. An alternative approach is suggested, based on a search algorithm to identify at-risk subgroups. METHODS Statistical methods to determine and visualise at-risk sub-groups in case-control studies are presented. The method of determining sub-groups--search partition analysis (SPAN)--searches among different Boolean combinations of risk factors. Sub-groups that have been identified are visualised by scaled rectangle diagrams. These show the size of sub-groups and the extent to which they overlap. RESULTS Theory is presented for applying the method to case-control data. The methods are illustrated by analysis of three case-control studies: one on sudden infant death syndrome, a second on heart disease and a third on child pedestrian injuries. CONCLUSIONS The methods provide a useful alternative to regression and tree-based analysis. They demarcate subgroups that, in the three examples, are easy to interpret and would not have been found by other methods. Scaled rectangle diagrams are a useful way to visualise the results.","PeriodicalId":80024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining and visualising at-risk groups in case-control data.\",\"authors\":\"R. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13595220152601819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Case-control research is often exploratory; to determine factors that increase risk. Often, regression methods are used to determine combinations of risk factors that predispose to excess risk. Recently, tree-based methods have also been proposed. Both have limitations. An alternative approach is suggested, based on a search algorithm to identify at-risk subgroups. METHODS Statistical methods to determine and visualise at-risk sub-groups in case-control studies are presented. The method of determining sub-groups--search partition analysis (SPAN)--searches among different Boolean combinations of risk factors. Sub-groups that have been identified are visualised by scaled rectangle diagrams. These show the size of sub-groups and the extent to which they overlap. RESULTS Theory is presented for applying the method to case-control data. The methods are illustrated by analysis of three case-control studies: one on sudden infant death syndrome, a second on heart disease and a third on child pedestrian injuries. CONCLUSIONS The methods provide a useful alternative to regression and tree-based analysis. They demarcate subgroups that, in the three examples, are easy to interpret and would not have been found by other methods. Scaled rectangle diagrams are a useful way to visualise the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13595220152601819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13595220152601819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

病例对照研究往往是探索性的;确定增加风险的因素。通常,回归方法用于确定易导致过度风险的风险因素的组合。最近,基于树的方法也被提出。两者都有局限性。提出了另一种方法,基于搜索算法来识别有风险的子群体。方法介绍了病例对照研究中确定和可视化高危亚组的统计方法。确定子群的方法——搜索分区分析(SPAN)——在不同的风险因素布尔组合中搜索。已确定的子组通过缩放矩形图可视化。这些显示了子群体的大小和它们重叠的程度。结果为该方法在病例对照资料中的应用提供了理论依据。这些方法是通过对三个病例对照研究的分析来说明的:一个是关于婴儿猝死综合症的,第二个是关于心脏病的,第三个是关于儿童行人伤害的。结论该方法是一种有效的替代回归分析和树分析法的方法。在上述三个例子中,它们划分的子群体很容易解释,用其他方法是找不到的。缩放矩形图是可视化结果的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining and visualising at-risk groups in case-control data.
BACKGROUND Case-control research is often exploratory; to determine factors that increase risk. Often, regression methods are used to determine combinations of risk factors that predispose to excess risk. Recently, tree-based methods have also been proposed. Both have limitations. An alternative approach is suggested, based on a search algorithm to identify at-risk subgroups. METHODS Statistical methods to determine and visualise at-risk sub-groups in case-control studies are presented. The method of determining sub-groups--search partition analysis (SPAN)--searches among different Boolean combinations of risk factors. Sub-groups that have been identified are visualised by scaled rectangle diagrams. These show the size of sub-groups and the extent to which they overlap. RESULTS Theory is presented for applying the method to case-control data. The methods are illustrated by analysis of three case-control studies: one on sudden infant death syndrome, a second on heart disease and a third on child pedestrian injuries. CONCLUSIONS The methods provide a useful alternative to regression and tree-based analysis. They demarcate subgroups that, in the three examples, are easy to interpret and would not have been found by other methods. Scaled rectangle diagrams are a useful way to visualise the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信