有组织乳腺癌筛查质量控制的统计问题。

W. Rittgen, N. Becker
{"title":"有组织乳腺癌筛查质量控制的统计问题。","authors":"W. Rittgen, N. Becker","doi":"10.1080/135952201317225453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND European guidelines for breast-cancer screening recommend an integrated approach of mammography screening with subsequent assessment and biopsy, if required, in one screening unit under permanent quality control, for which target values are released. Although the calculation of the respective rates (e.g. for participation, assessment, biopsy, or cancer detection) appears trivial, the statistical assessment of their compatibility with the target values is less obvious. This is especially true if subjects with a positive diagnostic result leave the screening-assessment chain prematurely, and information about further diagnostic results outside the organised screening is lacking. METHOD Statistical models for the basic situation, in which complete information about the screening and assessment outcome is available, as well as for when information is incomplete, are presented. The statistical methods for obtaining the confidence limits, statistical tests and sample sizes needed to obtain a desired power of tests for the process parameters of interest are also given. RESULTS The sample-size calculations indicate that large numbers of enrolled subjects are required to obtain reasonably narrow confidence limits, and that incomplete information about the outcome of diagnostic procedures among screening positives considerably worsens the feasibility of quality control. CONCLUSIONS Although the methodology is specified for breast-cancer screening, it should be adaptable easily to other screening issues.","PeriodicalId":80024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical issues of quality control in organised breast cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"W. Rittgen, N. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/135952201317225453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND European guidelines for breast-cancer screening recommend an integrated approach of mammography screening with subsequent assessment and biopsy, if required, in one screening unit under permanent quality control, for which target values are released. Although the calculation of the respective rates (e.g. for participation, assessment, biopsy, or cancer detection) appears trivial, the statistical assessment of their compatibility with the target values is less obvious. This is especially true if subjects with a positive diagnostic result leave the screening-assessment chain prematurely, and information about further diagnostic results outside the organised screening is lacking. METHOD Statistical models for the basic situation, in which complete information about the screening and assessment outcome is available, as well as for when information is incomplete, are presented. The statistical methods for obtaining the confidence limits, statistical tests and sample sizes needed to obtain a desired power of tests for the process parameters of interest are also given. RESULTS The sample-size calculations indicate that large numbers of enrolled subjects are required to obtain reasonably narrow confidence limits, and that incomplete information about the outcome of diagnostic procedures among screening positives considerably worsens the feasibility of quality control. CONCLUSIONS Although the methodology is specified for breast-cancer screening, it should be adaptable easily to other screening issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/135952201317225453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/135952201317225453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:欧洲乳腺癌筛查指南建议在一个筛查单元中采用乳房x线摄影筛查的综合方法,如有必要,进行后续评估和活检,并进行永久性质量控制,并公布目标值。虽然计算各自的比率(例如参与、评估、活检或癌症检测)似乎微不足道,但统计评估它们与目标值的相容性却不那么明显。如果诊断结果为阳性的受试者过早地离开筛查评估链,并且缺乏有关有组织筛查之外进一步诊断结果的信息,则尤其如此。方法建立了筛查和评估结果信息完备时的基本情况和信息不完备时的统计模型。还给出了获得感兴趣的工艺参数所需的测试功率所需的置信限、统计检验和样本量的统计方法。结果样本量的计算表明,需要大量的入组受试者才能获得合理的窄置信限,而在筛查阳性患者中,关于诊断过程结果的不完整信息大大降低了质量控制的可行性。结论该方法虽是针对乳腺癌筛查而制定的,但应易于适用于其他筛查问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical issues of quality control in organised breast cancer screening.
BACKGROUND European guidelines for breast-cancer screening recommend an integrated approach of mammography screening with subsequent assessment and biopsy, if required, in one screening unit under permanent quality control, for which target values are released. Although the calculation of the respective rates (e.g. for participation, assessment, biopsy, or cancer detection) appears trivial, the statistical assessment of their compatibility with the target values is less obvious. This is especially true if subjects with a positive diagnostic result leave the screening-assessment chain prematurely, and information about further diagnostic results outside the organised screening is lacking. METHOD Statistical models for the basic situation, in which complete information about the screening and assessment outcome is available, as well as for when information is incomplete, are presented. The statistical methods for obtaining the confidence limits, statistical tests and sample sizes needed to obtain a desired power of tests for the process parameters of interest are also given. RESULTS The sample-size calculations indicate that large numbers of enrolled subjects are required to obtain reasonably narrow confidence limits, and that incomplete information about the outcome of diagnostic procedures among screening positives considerably worsens the feasibility of quality control. CONCLUSIONS Although the methodology is specified for breast-cancer screening, it should be adaptable easily to other screening issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信