家庭附属地块的自我维持:前社会主义国家农业私有化的经验教训

Z. Lerman, Yevgeniy Tankhilevich, KiriU Mozhin, N. Sapova
{"title":"家庭附属地块的自我维持:前社会主义国家农业私有化的经验教训","authors":"Z. Lerman, Yevgeniy Tankhilevich, KiriU Mozhin, N. Sapova","doi":"10.1080/10605851.1994.10640973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A paper devoted to subsidiary household (private) plots in the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union explores issues surrounding their economic viability during the current period of economic transition and agrarian reform, using Russian farms as the main example. Considerable emphasis is placed on the continuing strong linkages between subsidiary household plots and the system of collectivized agriculture, one of several factors that serves to differentiate this type of agriculture from the private (peasant) farms receiving so much attention recently as an indicator of agrarian reform. A key argument of the paper is that the performance of subsidiary household farms is not a good indicator of prospects for success of private farming in Russia, because subsidiary farms are closely linked to collectivized agriculture in terms of sources of inputs and channels for outputs, and therefore are not inherently “private.” 8 tables, 24 references.","PeriodicalId":85331,"journal":{"name":"Post-Soviet geography","volume":"35 1","pages":"526-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10605851.1994.10640973","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Sustainability of Subsidiary Household Plots: Lessons for Privatization of Agriculture in Former Socialist Countries\",\"authors\":\"Z. Lerman, Yevgeniy Tankhilevich, KiriU Mozhin, N. Sapova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10605851.1994.10640973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A paper devoted to subsidiary household (private) plots in the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union explores issues surrounding their economic viability during the current period of economic transition and agrarian reform, using Russian farms as the main example. Considerable emphasis is placed on the continuing strong linkages between subsidiary household plots and the system of collectivized agriculture, one of several factors that serves to differentiate this type of agriculture from the private (peasant) farms receiving so much attention recently as an indicator of agrarian reform. A key argument of the paper is that the performance of subsidiary household farms is not a good indicator of prospects for success of private farming in Russia, because subsidiary farms are closely linked to collectivized agriculture in terms of sources of inputs and channels for outputs, and therefore are not inherently “private.” 8 tables, 24 references.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Soviet geography\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"526-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10605851.1994.10640973\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Soviet geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10605851.1994.10640973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Soviet geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10605851.1994.10640973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

一篇研究东欧和前苏联前社会主义国家附属家庭(私人)地块的论文,以俄罗斯农场为主要例子,探讨了在当前经济转型和土地改革时期围绕其经济可行性的问题。相当多的重点放在附属家庭地块与集体化农业制度之间持续的密切联系上,这是将这种农业与最近作为土地改革指标受到如此多关注的私人(农民)农场区分开来的几个因素之一。本文的一个关键论点是,附属家庭农场的表现并不是俄罗斯私人农业成功前景的良好指标,因为附属农场在投入来源和产出渠道方面与集体化农业密切相关,因此不是天生的“私人”。“8张表,24篇参考文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-Sustainability of Subsidiary Household Plots: Lessons for Privatization of Agriculture in Former Socialist Countries
A paper devoted to subsidiary household (private) plots in the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union explores issues surrounding their economic viability during the current period of economic transition and agrarian reform, using Russian farms as the main example. Considerable emphasis is placed on the continuing strong linkages between subsidiary household plots and the system of collectivized agriculture, one of several factors that serves to differentiate this type of agriculture from the private (peasant) farms receiving so much attention recently as an indicator of agrarian reform. A key argument of the paper is that the performance of subsidiary household farms is not a good indicator of prospects for success of private farming in Russia, because subsidiary farms are closely linked to collectivized agriculture in terms of sources of inputs and channels for outputs, and therefore are not inherently “private.” 8 tables, 24 references.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信