轻度缺氧对工作记忆、复杂逻辑推理和风险判断的影响

S. Legg, S. Hill, A. Gilbey, A. Raman, Z. Schlader, T. Mündel
{"title":"轻度缺氧对工作记忆、复杂逻辑推理和风险判断的影响","authors":"S. Legg, S. Hill, A. Gilbey, A. Raman, Z. Schlader, T. Mündel","doi":"10.1080/10508414.2014.892751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mild hypoxia, typically equivalent to a pressurized aircraft cabin altitude of 2,438 m (8,000 ft), does not generally affect well-learned cognitive, vigilance, and perceptual-motor performance. Learning and novel and complex cognitive tasks involving multiple demands, however, might be impaired. This study evaluated whether complex cognition—as assessed by complex reasoning, multiple memory, and risk judgment—was impaired during mild hypoxia. Using a normobaric single-blind crossover design, 25 healthy nonsmoking male participants breathed normoxic (FiO2 = 0.206) or hypoxic air (FiO2 = 0.143) equivalent to 2,438 m for 2 hr and performed the following tasks at baseline, 30 min, and 90 min: (a) a complex logical reasoning task that assessed accuracy, response time, and a reasoning quality index for easy (nonconflict valid), difficult (nonconflict invalid), fairly difficult (conflict valid), and very difficult (conflict invalid) syllogisms; (b) a multiple memory test that assessed sentence judgment error, working memory span, and prospective memory; and (c) a simple vigilance psychomotor task that assessed the frequency and mean time that a disc was outside a target area and braking reaction time. They also completed a self-perceived risk judgement questionnaire near the end of each exposure. After 90 min, the mean change in working memory span for mild hypoxia (M = 0.9, SD = 4.6) was significantly less than for normoxia (M = 4.4, SD = 7.2). The reasoning quality index for conflict invalid syllogisms for mild hypoxia (M = 0.22, SD = 0.29) was marginally significantly less than for normoxia (M = 0.39, SD = 0.35). The chances of these findings occurring by chance cannot be discounted, but are small. Although this study suggests that mild hypoxia might impair working memory and complex logical reasoning involving difficult conflicts, further studies using more discerning tests of cognition are warranted.","PeriodicalId":83071,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of aviation psychology","volume":"24 1","pages":"126 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508414.2014.892751","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Mild Hypoxia on Working Memory, Complex Logical Reasoning, and Risk Judgment\",\"authors\":\"S. Legg, S. Hill, A. Gilbey, A. Raman, Z. Schlader, T. Mündel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10508414.2014.892751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mild hypoxia, typically equivalent to a pressurized aircraft cabin altitude of 2,438 m (8,000 ft), does not generally affect well-learned cognitive, vigilance, and perceptual-motor performance. Learning and novel and complex cognitive tasks involving multiple demands, however, might be impaired. This study evaluated whether complex cognition—as assessed by complex reasoning, multiple memory, and risk judgment—was impaired during mild hypoxia. Using a normobaric single-blind crossover design, 25 healthy nonsmoking male participants breathed normoxic (FiO2 = 0.206) or hypoxic air (FiO2 = 0.143) equivalent to 2,438 m for 2 hr and performed the following tasks at baseline, 30 min, and 90 min: (a) a complex logical reasoning task that assessed accuracy, response time, and a reasoning quality index for easy (nonconflict valid), difficult (nonconflict invalid), fairly difficult (conflict valid), and very difficult (conflict invalid) syllogisms; (b) a multiple memory test that assessed sentence judgment error, working memory span, and prospective memory; and (c) a simple vigilance psychomotor task that assessed the frequency and mean time that a disc was outside a target area and braking reaction time. They also completed a self-perceived risk judgement questionnaire near the end of each exposure. After 90 min, the mean change in working memory span for mild hypoxia (M = 0.9, SD = 4.6) was significantly less than for normoxia (M = 4.4, SD = 7.2). The reasoning quality index for conflict invalid syllogisms for mild hypoxia (M = 0.22, SD = 0.29) was marginally significantly less than for normoxia (M = 0.39, SD = 0.35). The chances of these findings occurring by chance cannot be discounted, but are small. Although this study suggests that mild hypoxia might impair working memory and complex logical reasoning involving difficult conflicts, further studies using more discerning tests of cognition are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of aviation psychology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"126 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10508414.2014.892751\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of aviation psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2014.892751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of aviation psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2014.892751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

轻度缺氧,通常相当于加压飞机客舱高度2438米(8000英尺),一般不会影响良好的认知、警觉性和感知运动表现。然而,涉及多种需求的学习和新颖复杂的认知任务可能会受损。这项研究评估了在轻度缺氧时,复杂认知——通过复杂推理、多重记忆和风险判断来评估——是否受损。采用常压单盲交叉设计,25名健康的非吸烟男性受试者呼吸相当于2,438 m的常压(FiO2 = 0.206)或低氧(FiO2 = 0.143)空气2小时,并在基线、30分钟和90分钟执行以下任务:(a)一个复杂的逻辑推理任务,评估简单(无冲突有效)、困难(无冲突无效)、相当困难(冲突有效)和非常困难(冲突无效)三段论的准确性、响应时间和推理质量指标;(b)多项记忆测试,评估句子判断错误、工作记忆广度和前瞻记忆;(c)一个简单的警觉性精神运动任务,评估圆盘在目标区域外的频率和平均时间以及制动反应时间。在每次暴露结束时,他们还完成了一份自我感知风险判断问卷。90 min后,轻度缺氧组(M = 0.9, SD = 4.6)的工作记忆广度平均变化显著小于正常缺氧组(M = 4.4, SD = 7.2)。轻度缺氧组(M = 0.22, SD = 0.29)冲突无效三段论的推理质量指数略低于正常缺氧组(M = 0.39, SD = 0.35)。这些发现偶然发生的可能性不容忽视,但可能性很小。虽然这项研究表明轻度缺氧可能会损害工作记忆和复杂的逻辑推理,包括困难的冲突,但进一步的研究需要使用更有洞察力的认知测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Mild Hypoxia on Working Memory, Complex Logical Reasoning, and Risk Judgment
Mild hypoxia, typically equivalent to a pressurized aircraft cabin altitude of 2,438 m (8,000 ft), does not generally affect well-learned cognitive, vigilance, and perceptual-motor performance. Learning and novel and complex cognitive tasks involving multiple demands, however, might be impaired. This study evaluated whether complex cognition—as assessed by complex reasoning, multiple memory, and risk judgment—was impaired during mild hypoxia. Using a normobaric single-blind crossover design, 25 healthy nonsmoking male participants breathed normoxic (FiO2 = 0.206) or hypoxic air (FiO2 = 0.143) equivalent to 2,438 m for 2 hr and performed the following tasks at baseline, 30 min, and 90 min: (a) a complex logical reasoning task that assessed accuracy, response time, and a reasoning quality index for easy (nonconflict valid), difficult (nonconflict invalid), fairly difficult (conflict valid), and very difficult (conflict invalid) syllogisms; (b) a multiple memory test that assessed sentence judgment error, working memory span, and prospective memory; and (c) a simple vigilance psychomotor task that assessed the frequency and mean time that a disc was outside a target area and braking reaction time. They also completed a self-perceived risk judgement questionnaire near the end of each exposure. After 90 min, the mean change in working memory span for mild hypoxia (M = 0.9, SD = 4.6) was significantly less than for normoxia (M = 4.4, SD = 7.2). The reasoning quality index for conflict invalid syllogisms for mild hypoxia (M = 0.22, SD = 0.29) was marginally significantly less than for normoxia (M = 0.39, SD = 0.35). The chances of these findings occurring by chance cannot be discounted, but are small. Although this study suggests that mild hypoxia might impair working memory and complex logical reasoning involving difficult conflicts, further studies using more discerning tests of cognition are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信