标志背后——全球鱼类可持续发展信息计划综述

G. Parkes, James A. Young, S. Walmsley, R. Abel, J. Harman, P. Horvát, A. Lem, A. Macfarlane, Maarten Mens, Conor Nolan
{"title":"标志背后——全球鱼类可持续发展信息计划综述","authors":"G. Parkes, James A. Young, S. Walmsley, R. Abel, J. Harman, P. Horvát, A. Lem, A. Macfarlane, Maarten Mens, Conor Nolan","doi":"10.1080/10641262.2010.516374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of a global review of organizations that provide sustainable fisheries information—including ecolabels, recommendation lists, and supermarkets—to consumers and supply chain intermediaries. It examined 17 organizations and key supermarkets that communicate on the sustainability of world fisheries and aquaculture products. Certification schemes assess a relatively small number of specific fisheries and indicate sustainability through labels. Recommendation lists cover more species and areas but in less detail. Most schemes showed improving conformance with FAO guidelines for fisheries and aquaculture certification. However, significant variation in fisheries’ assessment exists, calling into question the accuracy and precision of information and advice provided. Inconsistent approaches and contradictory advice among certification schemes and recommendation lists potentially increase consumer confusion and reduce their credibility. The review identifies seven critical attributes that schemes must address—scope, accuracy, independence, precision, transparency, standardization, and cost-effectiveness—and recommends that certification schemes and recommendation lists enhance their consistency and credibility through compliance with these attributes and FAO guidelines. Fish sustainability information schemes play an important role in securing a sustainable future for the oceans. Uptake of this review's recommendations should reduce consumer confusion and increase confidence in the benefits of sustainable purchasing.","PeriodicalId":49627,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2010.516374","citationCount":"125","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behind the Signs—A Global Review of Fish Sustainability Information Schemes\",\"authors\":\"G. Parkes, James A. Young, S. Walmsley, R. Abel, J. Harman, P. Horvát, A. Lem, A. Macfarlane, Maarten Mens, Conor Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641262.2010.516374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the results of a global review of organizations that provide sustainable fisheries information—including ecolabels, recommendation lists, and supermarkets—to consumers and supply chain intermediaries. It examined 17 organizations and key supermarkets that communicate on the sustainability of world fisheries and aquaculture products. Certification schemes assess a relatively small number of specific fisheries and indicate sustainability through labels. Recommendation lists cover more species and areas but in less detail. Most schemes showed improving conformance with FAO guidelines for fisheries and aquaculture certification. However, significant variation in fisheries’ assessment exists, calling into question the accuracy and precision of information and advice provided. Inconsistent approaches and contradictory advice among certification schemes and recommendation lists potentially increase consumer confusion and reduce their credibility. The review identifies seven critical attributes that schemes must address—scope, accuracy, independence, precision, transparency, standardization, and cost-effectiveness—and recommends that certification schemes and recommendation lists enhance their consistency and credibility through compliance with these attributes and FAO guidelines. Fish sustainability information schemes play an important role in securing a sustainable future for the oceans. Uptake of this review's recommendations should reduce consumer confusion and increase confidence in the benefits of sustainable purchasing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Fisheries Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641262.2010.516374\",\"citationCount\":\"125\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Fisheries Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2010.516374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Fisheries Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2010.516374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

摘要

本文介绍了对向消费者和供应链中介机构提供可持续渔业信息(包括生态标签、推荐清单和超市)的组织的全球审查结果。它审查了就世界渔业和水产养殖产品的可持续性进行交流的17个组织和主要超市。核证计划评估相对较少的特定渔业,并通过标签表明可持续性。推荐清单涵盖了更多的物种和地区,但细节较少。大多数计划显示出对粮农组织渔业和水产养殖核证准则的遵守有所改善。然而,渔业的评估存在很大差异,这使人们对所提供的信息和咨询的准确性和精确性产生了疑问。认证方案和推荐清单中不一致的方法和相互矛盾的建议可能会增加消费者的困惑,并降低其可信度。审查确定了认证计划必须解决的七个关键属性——范围、准确性、独立性、精确性、透明度、标准化和成本效益,并建议认证计划和建议清单通过遵守这些属性和粮农组织准则来增强其一致性和可信度。鱼类可持续性信息计划在确保海洋的可持续未来方面发挥着重要作用。采纳该审查的建议应能减少消费者的困惑,并增强对可持续采购益处的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behind the Signs—A Global Review of Fish Sustainability Information Schemes
This article presents the results of a global review of organizations that provide sustainable fisheries information—including ecolabels, recommendation lists, and supermarkets—to consumers and supply chain intermediaries. It examined 17 organizations and key supermarkets that communicate on the sustainability of world fisheries and aquaculture products. Certification schemes assess a relatively small number of specific fisheries and indicate sustainability through labels. Recommendation lists cover more species and areas but in less detail. Most schemes showed improving conformance with FAO guidelines for fisheries and aquaculture certification. However, significant variation in fisheries’ assessment exists, calling into question the accuracy and precision of information and advice provided. Inconsistent approaches and contradictory advice among certification schemes and recommendation lists potentially increase consumer confusion and reduce their credibility. The review identifies seven critical attributes that schemes must address—scope, accuracy, independence, precision, transparency, standardization, and cost-effectiveness—and recommends that certification schemes and recommendation lists enhance their consistency and credibility through compliance with these attributes and FAO guidelines. Fish sustainability information schemes play an important role in securing a sustainable future for the oceans. Uptake of this review's recommendations should reduce consumer confusion and increase confidence in the benefits of sustainable purchasing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Reviews in Fisheries Science 农林科学-渔业
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信