遗忘遗忘:选择性地忘记自己的错误

IF 12.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Sedikides, Jeffrey D. Green, J. Saunders, John J. Skowronski, Bettina Zengel
{"title":"遗忘遗忘:选择性地忘记自己的错误","authors":"C. Sedikides, Jeffrey D. Green, J. Saunders, John J. Skowronski, Bettina Zengel","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The mnemic neglect model predicts and accounts for selective memory for social feedback as a function of various feedback properties. At the heart of the model is the mnemic neglect effect (MNE), defined as inferior recall for self-threatening feedback compared to other kinds of feedback. The effect emerges both in mundane realism and minimal feedback settings. The effect is presumed to occur in the service of self-protection motivation. Mnemic neglect is pronounced when the feedback poses high levels of self-threat (i.e., can detect accurately one’s weakness), but is lost when self-threat is averted via a self-affirmation manipulation. Mnemic neglect is caused by self-threatening feedback being processed shallowly and in ways that separate it from stored (positive) self-knowledge. The emergence of mnemic neglect is qualified by situational moderators (extent to which one considers their self-conceptions modifiable, receives feedback from a close source, or is primed with improvement-related constructs) and individual differences moderators (anxiety, dysphoria, or defensive pessimism). Finally, the MNE is present in recall, but absent in recognition. Output interference cannot explain this disparity in results, but an inhibitory repression account (e.g., experiential avoidance) can: Repressors show enhanced mnemic neglect. The findings advance research on memory, motivation, and the self.","PeriodicalId":10,"journal":{"name":"ACS Central Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913","citationCount":"127","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults\",\"authors\":\"C. Sedikides, Jeffrey D. Green, J. Saunders, John J. Skowronski, Bettina Zengel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The mnemic neglect model predicts and accounts for selective memory for social feedback as a function of various feedback properties. At the heart of the model is the mnemic neglect effect (MNE), defined as inferior recall for self-threatening feedback compared to other kinds of feedback. The effect emerges both in mundane realism and minimal feedback settings. The effect is presumed to occur in the service of self-protection motivation. Mnemic neglect is pronounced when the feedback poses high levels of self-threat (i.e., can detect accurately one’s weakness), but is lost when self-threat is averted via a self-affirmation manipulation. Mnemic neglect is caused by self-threatening feedback being processed shallowly and in ways that separate it from stored (positive) self-knowledge. The emergence of mnemic neglect is qualified by situational moderators (extent to which one considers their self-conceptions modifiable, receives feedback from a close source, or is primed with improvement-related constructs) and individual differences moderators (anxiety, dysphoria, or defensive pessimism). Finally, the MNE is present in recall, but absent in recognition. Output interference cannot explain this disparity in results, but an inhibitory repression account (e.g., experiential avoidance) can: Repressors show enhanced mnemic neglect. The findings advance research on memory, motivation, and the self.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Central Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913\",\"citationCount\":\"127\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Central Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Central Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

摘要

助记忽略模型预测并解释了社会反馈的选择性记忆作为各种反馈特性的函数。该模型的核心是记忆忽略效应(MNE),定义为与其他类型的反馈相比,自我威胁反馈的回忆较差。这种效果出现在平凡的现实主义和最小的反馈设置中。这种效应被认为是为自我保护动机服务的。当反馈带来高水平的自我威胁时(即,可以准确地检测到一个人的弱点),记忆忽略就会明显,但当通过自我肯定操纵来避免自我威胁时,记忆忽略就会消失。记忆遗忘是由于自我威胁的反馈被肤浅地处理,并以与储存的(积极的)自我认知分离的方式造成的。助记忽视的出现受到情境调节因子(一个人认为他们的自我概念可修改的程度,从接近的来源获得反馈,或被改善相关的构念启动)和个体差异调节因子(焦虑,不安或防御性悲观)的限制。最后,跨国公司存在于回忆中,但不存在于识别中。输出干扰不能解释这种结果上的差异,但抑制性抑制解释(例如,经验回避)可以:抑制因子表现出增强的记忆忽略。这些发现推动了对记忆、动机和自我的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults
ABSTRACT The mnemic neglect model predicts and accounts for selective memory for social feedback as a function of various feedback properties. At the heart of the model is the mnemic neglect effect (MNE), defined as inferior recall for self-threatening feedback compared to other kinds of feedback. The effect emerges both in mundane realism and minimal feedback settings. The effect is presumed to occur in the service of self-protection motivation. Mnemic neglect is pronounced when the feedback poses high levels of self-threat (i.e., can detect accurately one’s weakness), but is lost when self-threat is averted via a self-affirmation manipulation. Mnemic neglect is caused by self-threatening feedback being processed shallowly and in ways that separate it from stored (positive) self-knowledge. The emergence of mnemic neglect is qualified by situational moderators (extent to which one considers their self-conceptions modifiable, receives feedback from a close source, or is primed with improvement-related constructs) and individual differences moderators (anxiety, dysphoria, or defensive pessimism). Finally, the MNE is present in recall, but absent in recognition. Output interference cannot explain this disparity in results, but an inhibitory repression account (e.g., experiential avoidance) can: Repressors show enhanced mnemic neglect. The findings advance research on memory, motivation, and the self.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Central Science
ACS Central Science Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
0.50%
发文量
194
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ACS Central Science publishes significant primary reports on research in chemistry and allied fields where chemical approaches are pivotal. As the first fully open-access journal by the American Chemical Society, it covers compelling and important contributions to the broad chemistry and scientific community. "Central science," a term popularized nearly 40 years ago, emphasizes chemistry's central role in connecting physical and life sciences, and fundamental sciences with applied disciplines like medicine and engineering. The journal focuses on exceptional quality articles, addressing advances in fundamental chemistry and interdisciplinary research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信