{"title":"“主啊,让那些信赖自己群众的人失望吧!”——《塔利斯-伯德圣典》的新编辑方法","authors":"D. Collins","doi":"10.1080/08145857.2016.1239243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contents of the Cantiones sacrae, published by Thomas Tallis and William Byrd in 1575, have been edited, performed and recorded numerous times, yet John Milsom’s contribution to the Early English Church Music series is the first attempt to bring all of the works of this volume together in a single edition. Unlike other studies of this music, Milsom employs a system of parallel scores whereby variant states of each work, where they exist, are placed side by side in the edition with the version published in 1575. An introductory essay and detailed critical notes to each work and its variants preclude the need for detailed commentaries and notes at the end of the book, while footnotes to the musical editions are kept to a minimum. In the general introduction to the volume, Milsom takes issue with several tenacious views about the circumstances surrounding the publication of the Cantiones sacrae. Most contentious are his arguments that it was a book intended for a primarily Continental readership and that it was not necessarily a financial failure. The present article assesses the merits of Milsom’s editorial approach and contextual discussions and their likely impact on the field of early music scholarship. In his edition of the monumental Cantiones, quae ab argumento sacrae vocantur, published in 1575 as a joint venture between England’s two most eminent English composers, John Milsom presents the entire contents of the volume (hereafter CS1575) in their published order side by side with revisions and adaptations of individual works by Tallis and Byrd or by other hands. The result is a volume that departs significantly from prior editorial practice in the Early English Church Music series and indeed from many commonly encountered approaches to editing early music. Milsom’s aim is to put the book itself at the centre of his enterprise. As Magnus Williamson points out in his Foreword, Milsom considers CS1575 ‘as part, perhaps the central part, of a dynamic process of creation and adaptation’ which is illuminated by a detailed investigation of the reception history of CS1575 by way of its copies and contrafacta (p. v). The result is a book of nearly 500 pages, with no effort spared by the editor or publisher to gather in one place critical editions of each of the compositions in CS1575 and their variants until approximately the time of Byrd’s death. Milsom’s exemplary attention to editorial methodology along with his imaginative and frequently provocative assessments of historical and contextual issues will provide both novice and seasoned readers","PeriodicalId":41713,"journal":{"name":"Musicology Australia","volume":"38 1","pages":"172 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08145857.2016.1239243","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Discomfit them, O Lord, that Trust in their Own Multitude’: A New Editorial Approach to the Tallis–Byrd Cantiones sacrae\",\"authors\":\"D. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08145857.2016.1239243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contents of the Cantiones sacrae, published by Thomas Tallis and William Byrd in 1575, have been edited, performed and recorded numerous times, yet John Milsom’s contribution to the Early English Church Music series is the first attempt to bring all of the works of this volume together in a single edition. Unlike other studies of this music, Milsom employs a system of parallel scores whereby variant states of each work, where they exist, are placed side by side in the edition with the version published in 1575. An introductory essay and detailed critical notes to each work and its variants preclude the need for detailed commentaries and notes at the end of the book, while footnotes to the musical editions are kept to a minimum. In the general introduction to the volume, Milsom takes issue with several tenacious views about the circumstances surrounding the publication of the Cantiones sacrae. Most contentious are his arguments that it was a book intended for a primarily Continental readership and that it was not necessarily a financial failure. The present article assesses the merits of Milsom’s editorial approach and contextual discussions and their likely impact on the field of early music scholarship. In his edition of the monumental Cantiones, quae ab argumento sacrae vocantur, published in 1575 as a joint venture between England’s two most eminent English composers, John Milsom presents the entire contents of the volume (hereafter CS1575) in their published order side by side with revisions and adaptations of individual works by Tallis and Byrd or by other hands. The result is a volume that departs significantly from prior editorial practice in the Early English Church Music series and indeed from many commonly encountered approaches to editing early music. Milsom’s aim is to put the book itself at the centre of his enterprise. As Magnus Williamson points out in his Foreword, Milsom considers CS1575 ‘as part, perhaps the central part, of a dynamic process of creation and adaptation’ which is illuminated by a detailed investigation of the reception history of CS1575 by way of its copies and contrafacta (p. v). The result is a book of nearly 500 pages, with no effort spared by the editor or publisher to gather in one place critical editions of each of the compositions in CS1575 and their variants until approximately the time of Byrd’s death. Milsom’s exemplary attention to editorial methodology along with his imaginative and frequently provocative assessments of historical and contextual issues will provide both novice and seasoned readers\",\"PeriodicalId\":41713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musicology Australia\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08145857.2016.1239243\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musicology Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08145857.2016.1239243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musicology Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08145857.2016.1239243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由托马斯·塔利斯和威廉·伯德于1575年出版的《圣咏》的内容已经被编辑、演奏和录制了无数次,但约翰·米尔索姆对早期英国教会音乐系列的贡献是第一次尝试将该卷的所有作品集中在一个版本中。与其他对这种音乐的研究不同,米尔索姆采用了一种平行乐谱系统,即每个作品的不同状态,在它们存在的地方,在1575年出版的版本中并排放置。每个作品及其变体的介绍性文章和详细的批评笔记排除了在书末详细评论和注释的需要,而音乐版本的脚注则保持在最低限度。在对卷的一般介绍中,米尔索姆提出了几个关于《圣言》出版环境的顽固观点。最有争议的是他的论点,即这本书主要是为欧洲大陆的读者准备的,它不一定是一个财务失败。本文评估了米尔索姆的编辑方法和上下文讨论的优点及其对早期音乐学术领域的可能影响。在他的不朽的Cantiones版本中,quae ab argumento sacrae vocanur,出版于1575年,作为英国两位最杰出的英国作曲家的合作,约翰·米尔索姆(John Milsom)按照出版顺序呈现了该卷(以下简称CS1575)的全部内容,并与塔利斯和伯德或其他人对个别作品的修订和改编并排。结果是一卷,从早期英国教会音乐系列之前的编辑实践明显偏离,确实从许多常见的方法来编辑早期音乐。米尔索姆的目标是让这本书本身成为他事业的中心。马格努斯·威廉姆森在他的前言中指出,米尔索姆认为CS1575 "是创造和改编动态过程的一部分,也许是核心部分"这是通过对CS1575的接受历史的详细调查来阐明的通过它的副本和契约(第5页)结果是一本近500页的书,编辑或出版商不遗余力地将CS1575中每一篇作品及其变体的重要版本收集在一起,直到伯德去世前后。米尔索姆对编辑方法的模范关注,以及他对历史和背景问题富有想象力和经常具有挑衅性的评估,将为新手和经验丰富的读者提供帮助
‘Discomfit them, O Lord, that Trust in their Own Multitude’: A New Editorial Approach to the Tallis–Byrd Cantiones sacrae
The contents of the Cantiones sacrae, published by Thomas Tallis and William Byrd in 1575, have been edited, performed and recorded numerous times, yet John Milsom’s contribution to the Early English Church Music series is the first attempt to bring all of the works of this volume together in a single edition. Unlike other studies of this music, Milsom employs a system of parallel scores whereby variant states of each work, where they exist, are placed side by side in the edition with the version published in 1575. An introductory essay and detailed critical notes to each work and its variants preclude the need for detailed commentaries and notes at the end of the book, while footnotes to the musical editions are kept to a minimum. In the general introduction to the volume, Milsom takes issue with several tenacious views about the circumstances surrounding the publication of the Cantiones sacrae. Most contentious are his arguments that it was a book intended for a primarily Continental readership and that it was not necessarily a financial failure. The present article assesses the merits of Milsom’s editorial approach and contextual discussions and their likely impact on the field of early music scholarship. In his edition of the monumental Cantiones, quae ab argumento sacrae vocantur, published in 1575 as a joint venture between England’s two most eminent English composers, John Milsom presents the entire contents of the volume (hereafter CS1575) in their published order side by side with revisions and adaptations of individual works by Tallis and Byrd or by other hands. The result is a volume that departs significantly from prior editorial practice in the Early English Church Music series and indeed from many commonly encountered approaches to editing early music. Milsom’s aim is to put the book itself at the centre of his enterprise. As Magnus Williamson points out in his Foreword, Milsom considers CS1575 ‘as part, perhaps the central part, of a dynamic process of creation and adaptation’ which is illuminated by a detailed investigation of the reception history of CS1575 by way of its copies and contrafacta (p. v). The result is a book of nearly 500 pages, with no effort spared by the editor or publisher to gather in one place critical editions of each of the compositions in CS1575 and their variants until approximately the time of Byrd’s death. Milsom’s exemplary attention to editorial methodology along with his imaginative and frequently provocative assessments of historical and contextual issues will provide both novice and seasoned readers