发展经济学中的人类行为

IF 0.6 3区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 1999-12-01 DOI:10.1080/10427719900000045

B. Ingham

{"title":"发展经济学中的人类行为","authors":"B. Ingham","doi":"10.1080/10427719900000045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of the paper is human behaviour in long-run change as examplified in the writings of the 'pioneer' development economists, Lewis, Hirschman and Myrdal. Lewis is credited with recognizing the importance of human behaviour, though unable to resolve the limitations of neoclassical thinking. Hirschman and Myrdal, characterized as holistic and evolutionary in approach, are argued to be more successful in integrating human behaviour into theories of long-run change.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"6 1","pages":"606-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719900000045","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human behaviour in development economics\",\"authors\":\"B. Ingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10427719900000045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The focus of the paper is human behaviour in long-run change as examplified in the writings of the 'pioneer' development economists, Lewis, Hirschman and Myrdal. Lewis is credited with recognizing the importance of human behaviour, though unable to resolve the limitations of neoclassical thinking. Hirschman and Myrdal, characterized as holistic and evolutionary in approach, are argued to be more successful in integrating human behaviour into theories of long-run change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"606-623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719900000045\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719900000045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719900000045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的重点是长期变化中的人类行为，例如“先驱”发展经济学家刘易斯、赫希曼和默达尔的著作。刘易斯因认识到人类行为的重要性而受到赞誉，尽管他无法解决新古典主义思维的局限性。赫希曼和默达尔在方法上以整体和进化为特征，被认为在将人类行为整合到长期变化理论中更为成功。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Human behaviour in development economics

The focus of the paper is human behaviour in long-run change as examplified in the writings of the 'pioneer' development economists, Lewis, Hirschman and Myrdal. Lewis is credited with recognizing the importance of human behaviour, though unable to resolve the limitations of neoclassical thinking. Hirschman and Myrdal, characterized as holistic and evolutionary in approach, are argued to be more successful in integrating human behaviour into theories of long-run change.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.