{"title":"“缺钱”:重新评价莱西乌斯对借贷和取息的学术分析的贡献","authors":"T. V. Houdt","doi":"10.1080/10427719800000001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Jesuit theologian Leonard Lessius contributed his own small part to the intellectual renewal of the so-called 'School of Salamanca' by introducing into the scholastic doctrine on lending a new extrinsic title, which he termed 'lack of money' (carentia pecuniae). In this article, I re-examine the genesis of the extrinsic title in light of new evidence that I have discovered. I continue with a thorough analysis of the title itself. I argue that the introduction of carentia pecuniaewas a highly significant contribution to late scholastic economic thought because of its insight that interest represented the time value of money which was to be determined by a common estimate on the loan market or Bourse. Finally, I try to explain why Lessius did not consider it completely inconceivable or at odds that it was morally acceptable for merchants to fix a market or Bourse price for money lent, while at the same time remaining faithful to the traditional ecclesiastical prohibition of usury.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719800000001","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Lack of money': a reappraisal of Lessius' contribution to the scholastic analysis of money-lending and interest-taking\",\"authors\":\"T. V. Houdt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10427719800000001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Jesuit theologian Leonard Lessius contributed his own small part to the intellectual renewal of the so-called 'School of Salamanca' by introducing into the scholastic doctrine on lending a new extrinsic title, which he termed 'lack of money' (carentia pecuniae). In this article, I re-examine the genesis of the extrinsic title in light of new evidence that I have discovered. I continue with a thorough analysis of the title itself. I argue that the introduction of carentia pecuniaewas a highly significant contribution to late scholastic economic thought because of its insight that interest represented the time value of money which was to be determined by a common estimate on the loan market or Bourse. Finally, I try to explain why Lessius did not consider it completely inconceivable or at odds that it was morally acceptable for merchants to fix a market or Bourse price for money lent, while at the same time remaining faithful to the traditional ecclesiastical prohibition of usury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719800000001\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719800000001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719800000001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
耶稣会神学家莱纳德·莱西乌斯(Leonard Lessius)为所谓的“萨拉曼卡学派”(School of Salamanca)的知识复兴贡献了自己的一份微薄之力,他在学术教义中引入了一个新的外在头衔,他称之为“缺钱”(carrentia pecuniae)。在这篇文章中,我根据我发现的新证据重新审视了外在标题的起源。我将继续对标题本身进行深入分析。我认为,货币理论的引入是对晚期学术经济思想的一个非常重要的贡献,因为它洞察到利息代表了货币的时间价值,而货币的时间价值是由贷款市场或交易所的共同估计决定的。最后,我试图解释为什么莱西乌斯没有认为商人为借贷设定市场或交易所价格在道德上是可以接受的,而同时又忠实于传统的教会对高利贷的禁止,这是完全不可思议或不一致的。
'Lack of money': a reappraisal of Lessius' contribution to the scholastic analysis of money-lending and interest-taking
The Jesuit theologian Leonard Lessius contributed his own small part to the intellectual renewal of the so-called 'School of Salamanca' by introducing into the scholastic doctrine on lending a new extrinsic title, which he termed 'lack of money' (carentia pecuniae). In this article, I re-examine the genesis of the extrinsic title in light of new evidence that I have discovered. I continue with a thorough analysis of the title itself. I argue that the introduction of carentia pecuniaewas a highly significant contribution to late scholastic economic thought because of its insight that interest represented the time value of money which was to be determined by a common estimate on the loan market or Bourse. Finally, I try to explain why Lessius did not consider it completely inconceivable or at odds that it was morally acceptable for merchants to fix a market or Bourse price for money lent, while at the same time remaining faithful to the traditional ecclesiastical prohibition of usury.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.