普遍消费者的时代:对李嘉图政治的重新思考

IF 0.6 3区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 1997-06-01 DOI:10.1080/10427719700000037

Terry Peach

{"title":"普遍消费者的时代:对李嘉图政治的重新思考","authors":"Terry Peach","doi":"10.1080/10427719700000037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reconsiders Ricardo's political thought, its relationship with his political economy and, more generally, Ricardo's connection with the 'philosophical radicalism' of Bentham and James Mill. It is arguedinter alia, that Ricardo's politics were utilitarian and individualistic; that he developed a notion of a shared, homogeneous interest; that he believed that individuals should know their 'real' interests as a condition for their suffrage; and that he subscribed to a doctrine of virtual representation. It is also argued that Ricardo was considerably less 'radical' in his political views than some previous commentators have recognized.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"109 1","pages":"217-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719700000037","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The age of the universal consumer: a reconsideration of Ricardo's politics\",\"authors\":\"Terry Peach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10427719700000037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reconsiders Ricardo's political thought, its relationship with his political economy and, more generally, Ricardo's connection with the 'philosophical radicalism' of Bentham and James Mill. It is arguedinter alia, that Ricardo's politics were utilitarian and individualistic; that he developed a notion of a shared, homogeneous interest; that he believed that individuals should know their 'real' interests as a condition for their suffrage; and that he subscribed to a doctrine of virtual representation. It is also argued that Ricardo was considerably less 'radical' in his political views than some previous commentators have recognized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"217-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719700000037\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719700000037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719700000037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

本文重新审视李嘉图的政治思想及其与他的政治经济学的关系，更广泛地说，李嘉图与边沁和詹姆斯·穆勒的“哲学激进主义”的联系。有人认为，李嘉图的政治是功利主义和个人主义的;他形成了一种共同的、同质的利益观念;他认为个人应该知道自己的"真正"利益是获得选举权的条件;他赞同虚拟表现理论。也有人认为李嘉图在他的政治观点上并不像以前一些评论家所认识到的那样“激进”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The age of the universal consumer: a reconsideration of Ricardo's politics

This paper reconsiders Ricardo's political thought, its relationship with his political economy and, more generally, Ricardo's connection with the 'philosophical radicalism' of Bentham and James Mill. It is arguedinter alia, that Ricardo's politics were utilitarian and individualistic; that he developed a notion of a shared, homogeneous interest; that he believed that individuals should know their 'real' interests as a condition for their suffrage; and that he subscribed to a doctrine of virtual representation. It is also argued that Ricardo was considerably less 'radical' in his political views than some previous commentators have recognized.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.