{"title":"亚当·斯密关于社会生产关系的观点","authors":"Hyunhee Song","doi":"10.1080/10427719700000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article as a sequel to Song (1995), 'Adam Smith as an early pioneer of institutional individualism', aims to depict what Smith's conception of social relations of production looks like, and draws a tentative conclusion that when grasped in the whole context of Smith's system of social thought, it is neither neoclassical nor Marxian orthodoxy, but can be better appreciated as suggesting an independent - Smithian - perspective. Then, an exploratory claim is submitted to show that Smith's view of class and power relations is found to bear striking affinities with that of Max Weber, the great German sociologist.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"4 1","pages":"23-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719700000018","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adam Smith' conception of the social relations of production\",\"authors\":\"Hyunhee Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10427719700000018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article as a sequel to Song (1995), 'Adam Smith as an early pioneer of institutional individualism', aims to depict what Smith's conception of social relations of production looks like, and draws a tentative conclusion that when grasped in the whole context of Smith's system of social thought, it is neither neoclassical nor Marxian orthodoxy, but can be better appreciated as suggesting an independent - Smithian - perspective. Then, an exploratory claim is submitted to show that Smith's view of class and power relations is found to bear striking affinities with that of Max Weber, the great German sociologist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"23-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10427719700000018\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719700000018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719700000018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam Smith' conception of the social relations of production
This article as a sequel to Song (1995), 'Adam Smith as an early pioneer of institutional individualism', aims to depict what Smith's conception of social relations of production looks like, and draws a tentative conclusion that when grasped in the whole context of Smith's system of social thought, it is neither neoclassical nor Marxian orthodoxy, but can be better appreciated as suggesting an independent - Smithian - perspective. Then, an exploratory claim is submitted to show that Smith's view of class and power relations is found to bear striking affinities with that of Max Weber, the great German sociologist.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.