“在他们的œconomy中有一些奇妙而不可理解的东西”:理查德·坎蒂隆的《一般贸易性质》的英文版本

IF 0.6 3区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09672567.2012.735683

Richard van den Berg

{"title":"“在他们的œconomy中有一些奇妙而不可理解的东西”:理查德·坎蒂隆的《一般贸易性质》的英文版本","authors":"Richard van den Berg","doi":"10.1080/09672567.2012.735683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Until at least the 1750s, a number of drafts survived of Richard Cantillon's Essay on the Nature of Trade in General, in different stages of completion. This is suggested by a paragraph-by-paragraph comparison between three versions of Cantillon's writings, namely the French Essai of 1755, fragments of Postlethwayt's Universal Dictionary (1752–1754) and Philip Cantillon's Analysis of Trade (1759). Whilst numerous variations between the texts may be attributed to free translation practice or to interventions by later editors, others cannot. A comparative study of variations may provide us with insights into the development of the ideas of this masterly economic theorist.","PeriodicalId":51791,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","volume":"19 1","pages":"868 - 907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09672567.2012.735683","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Something wonderful and incomprehensible in their œconomy’: The English versions of Richard Cantillon's Essay on the Nature of Trade in General\",\"authors\":\"Richard van den Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09672567.2012.735683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Until at least the 1750s, a number of drafts survived of Richard Cantillon's Essay on the Nature of Trade in General, in different stages of completion. This is suggested by a paragraph-by-paragraph comparison between three versions of Cantillon's writings, namely the French Essai of 1755, fragments of Postlethwayt's Universal Dictionary (1752–1754) and Philip Cantillon's Analysis of Trade (1759). Whilst numerous variations between the texts may be attributed to free translation practice or to interventions by later editors, others cannot. A comparative study of variations may provide us with insights into the development of the ideas of this masterly economic theorist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"868 - 907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09672567.2012.735683\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2012.735683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of the History of Economic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2012.735683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

摘要

至少在18世纪50年代之前，理查德·坎蒂隆的《一般贸易性质论》(Essay on Nature of Trade in General)的一些草稿都处于不同的完成阶段。这一点可以通过对坎蒂永三个版本作品的逐段比较得出，即1755年的法语随笔，1752-1754年Postlethwayt的通用词典片段和菲利普·坎蒂永的《贸易分析》(1759)。虽然文本之间的许多差异可能归因于意译实践或后期编辑的干预，但其他文本则不能。对这些变化进行比较研究，或许能让我们深入了解这位杰出的经济理论家的思想发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

‘Something wonderful and incomprehensible in their œconomy’: The English versions of Richard Cantillon's Essay on the Nature of Trade in General

Abstract Until at least the 1750s, a number of drafts survived of Richard Cantillon's Essay on the Nature of Trade in General, in different stages of completion. This is suggested by a paragraph-by-paragraph comparison between three versions of Cantillon's writings, namely the French Essai of 1755, fragments of Postlethwayt's Universal Dictionary (1752–1754) and Philip Cantillon's Analysis of Trade (1759). Whilst numerous variations between the texts may be attributed to free translation practice or to interventions by later editors, others cannot. A comparative study of variations may provide us with insights into the development of the ideas of this masterly economic theorist.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (EJHET), a peer-reviewed journal, has quickly established itself as a leading forum for lively discussion on a wide range of issues in the history of economic thought. With contributions from both established international scholars and younger academics, EJHET is entirely pluralist and non-partisan with regard to subjects and methodologies - it does not subscribe to any particular current of thought, nor relate to any one geographic zone. The Managing Editors and Editorial Board and Advisory Board members are drawn from throughout Europe and beyond, and are committed to encouraging scholars from around the world to contribute to international research and debate.