追踪字面与强化假反身结果结构的转变:19 -20世纪荷兰语强化“死”的发展

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Emmeline Gyselinck, T. Colleman
{"title":"追踪字面与强化假反身结果结构的转变:19 -20世纪荷兰语强化“死”的发展","authors":"Emmeline Gyselinck, T. Colleman","doi":"10.1075/BJL.30.04GYS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores diachronic shifts in the literal and intensifying uses of dood ‘dead’ in the Dutch fake reflexive resultative construction. Without sufficient context, a clause like Hij werkte zich dood (lit. ‘He worked himself dead’) is ambiguous in that it is unclear whether dood expresses an actual result of the activity denoted by the verb or whether it intensifies that verbal activity. We will investigate shifts in the (relative) type and token frequencies of both subtypes over the last two centuries and show that the intensifying use has become predominant. Particular attention is paid to the notion of productivity, which may help us to elucidate the possible pathways along which dood – in its function as an intensifier – is moving. By taking into account the variety of verbs that dood has occurred with since the early 19th Century, we aim to assess whether the dramatic increase in relative frequency of intensifying dood is paralleled by a concomitant extension of its collocational range or, conversely, whether this increase in frequency is mainly due to the rise of some highly frequent collocations.","PeriodicalId":35124,"journal":{"name":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"30 1","pages":"55-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/BJL.30.04GYS","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction : the development of intensifying dood 'dead' in 19th-20th Century Dutch\",\"authors\":\"Emmeline Gyselinck, T. Colleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/BJL.30.04GYS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores diachronic shifts in the literal and intensifying uses of dood ‘dead’ in the Dutch fake reflexive resultative construction. Without sufficient context, a clause like Hij werkte zich dood (lit. ‘He worked himself dead’) is ambiguous in that it is unclear whether dood expresses an actual result of the activity denoted by the verb or whether it intensifies that verbal activity. We will investigate shifts in the (relative) type and token frequencies of both subtypes over the last two centuries and show that the intensifying use has become predominant. Particular attention is paid to the notion of productivity, which may help us to elucidate the possible pathways along which dood – in its function as an intensifier – is moving. By taking into account the variety of verbs that dood has occurred with since the early 19th Century, we aim to assess whether the dramatic increase in relative frequency of intensifying dood is paralleled by a concomitant extension of its collocational range or, conversely, whether this increase in frequency is mainly due to the rise of some highly frequent collocations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"55-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/BJL.30.04GYS\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.30.04GYS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.30.04GYS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨了荷兰语假反身结果结构中“死”的字面意义和强化用法的历时性变化。如果没有足够的上下文,像Hij werkte zich good(字面意思是“他自己工作死了”)这样的从句是模棱两可的,因为它不清楚good是表达了动词所表示的活动的实际结果,还是强化了口头活动。我们将研究在过去两个世纪中这两个亚型的(相对)类型和标记频率的变化,并表明强化使用已成为主导。我们特别注意生产力的概念,它可以帮助我们阐明“好”作为加强物的作用所沿着的可能的途径。考虑到自19世纪初以来,“好”动词出现的多样性,我们的目的是评估强化“好”的相对频率的急剧增加是否伴随着其搭配范围的扩展,或者相反,这种频率的增加是否主要是由于一些高度频繁搭配的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction : the development of intensifying dood 'dead' in 19th-20th Century Dutch
This paper explores diachronic shifts in the literal and intensifying uses of dood ‘dead’ in the Dutch fake reflexive resultative construction. Without sufficient context, a clause like Hij werkte zich dood (lit. ‘He worked himself dead’) is ambiguous in that it is unclear whether dood expresses an actual result of the activity denoted by the verb or whether it intensifies that verbal activity. We will investigate shifts in the (relative) type and token frequencies of both subtypes over the last two centuries and show that the intensifying use has become predominant. Particular attention is paid to the notion of productivity, which may help us to elucidate the possible pathways along which dood – in its function as an intensifier – is moving. By taking into account the variety of verbs that dood has occurred with since the early 19th Century, we aim to assess whether the dramatic increase in relative frequency of intensifying dood is paralleled by a concomitant extension of its collocational range or, conversely, whether this increase in frequency is mainly due to the rise of some highly frequent collocations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Belgian Journal of Linguistics
Belgian Journal of Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Belgian Journal of Linguistics is the annual publication of the Linguistic Society of Belgium and includes selected contributions from the international meetings organized by the LSB. Its volumes are topical and address a wide range of subjects in different fields of linguistics and neighboring disciplines (e.g. translation, poetics, political discourse). The BJL transcends its local basis, not only through the international orientation of its active advisory board, but also by inviting international scholars, both to act as guest editors and to contribute original papers. Articles go through an external and discriminating review process with due attention to ensuring the maintenance of the journal"s high-quality content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信