在证据性与认知情态之间:欧洲葡萄牙语将来句与条件句的案例

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Teresa Oliveira
{"title":"在证据性与认知情态之间:欧洲葡萄牙语将来句与条件句的案例","authors":"Teresa Oliveira","doi":"10.1075/BJL.29.05OLI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present an in-depth description of the synthetic and compound\nforms of the future and the conditional, as both inferential and reportative\nmarkers, drawing a framework for the respective distribution in Portuguese\njournalistic texts. A corpus analysis shows that different categories (evidentiality,\nmodality, tense, and aspect) contribute to the construction of the values in\nquestion, defining different sets of properties for each of the verbal forms, in\nboth inferential and reportative uses. Furthermore, it proves that these same\nvalues are particularly sensitive to textual genre: the reportative uses emerge in\nnews reports, while the inferential uses appear more frequently in opinion texts.\nUltimately, it illustrates how the use of these forms sheds light on the boundary\nbetween epistemic modality and evidentiality, demonstrating that the assertion\nof the information source is distinct from the assessment of the speaker’s attitude\ntoward his/her statement.","PeriodicalId":35124,"journal":{"name":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"29 1","pages":"101-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/BJL.29.05OLI","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between evidentiality and epistemic modality: The case of the future and the conditional in european Portuguese\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/BJL.29.05OLI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to present an in-depth description of the synthetic and compound\\nforms of the future and the conditional, as both inferential and reportative\\nmarkers, drawing a framework for the respective distribution in Portuguese\\njournalistic texts. A corpus analysis shows that different categories (evidentiality,\\nmodality, tense, and aspect) contribute to the construction of the values in\\nquestion, defining different sets of properties for each of the verbal forms, in\\nboth inferential and reportative uses. Furthermore, it proves that these same\\nvalues are particularly sensitive to textual genre: the reportative uses emerge in\\nnews reports, while the inferential uses appear more frequently in opinion texts.\\nUltimately, it illustrates how the use of these forms sheds light on the boundary\\nbetween epistemic modality and evidentiality, demonstrating that the assertion\\nof the information source is distinct from the assessment of the speaker’s attitude\\ntoward his/her statement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"101-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/BJL.29.05OLI\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.29.05OLI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.29.05OLI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文旨在深入描述将来时和条件句的合成和复合形式,作为推理和报告标记,并为葡萄牙语新闻文本中各自的分布绘制框架。语料库分析表明,不同的类别(证据性、情态、时态和方面)有助于所讨论的价值的构建,在推理和报告使用中为每种口头形式定义了不同的属性集。此外,研究还证明,这些相同的价值对语篇体裁特别敏感:报道性用法出现在新闻报道中,而推理性用法更多地出现在意见语篇中。最后,它说明了这些形式的使用如何阐明了认知模态和证据性之间的界限,表明对信息源的断言不同于对说话人对他/她的陈述的态度的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between evidentiality and epistemic modality: The case of the future and the conditional in european Portuguese
This paper aims to present an in-depth description of the synthetic and compound forms of the future and the conditional, as both inferential and reportative markers, drawing a framework for the respective distribution in Portuguese journalistic texts. A corpus analysis shows that different categories (evidentiality, modality, tense, and aspect) contribute to the construction of the values in question, defining different sets of properties for each of the verbal forms, in both inferential and reportative uses. Furthermore, it proves that these same values are particularly sensitive to textual genre: the reportative uses emerge in news reports, while the inferential uses appear more frequently in opinion texts. Ultimately, it illustrates how the use of these forms sheds light on the boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality, demonstrating that the assertion of the information source is distinct from the assessment of the speaker’s attitude toward his/her statement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Belgian Journal of Linguistics
Belgian Journal of Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Belgian Journal of Linguistics is the annual publication of the Linguistic Society of Belgium and includes selected contributions from the international meetings organized by the LSB. Its volumes are topical and address a wide range of subjects in different fields of linguistics and neighboring disciplines (e.g. translation, poetics, political discourse). The BJL transcends its local basis, not only through the international orientation of its active advisory board, but also by inviting international scholars, both to act as guest editors and to contribute original papers. Articles go through an external and discriminating review process with due attention to ensuring the maintenance of the journal"s high-quality content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信