基于凭证的服务环境中共同创造的前因和结果

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Berna Tarı Kasnakoğlu
{"title":"基于凭证的服务环境中共同创造的前因和结果","authors":"Berna Tarı Kasnakoğlu","doi":"10.1080/02642069.2016.1138472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study proposes that co-creation is a dialogical process which involves a high level of participation by both partners, and attempts to test a co-creation model, where partners engage in a service interaction using their operant resources. Results from 65 exploratory interviews and 502 scenario-based experiments demonstrate that operant resources lead to higher levels of participation; however, participation by one partner does not lead to co-creation unless the other partner is also participating, indicating the constructive effects of a mutually contributing relationship. Results also imply that co-creation is a highly contextual and interactive phenomenon, thus the dimensions and the effects of mutual participation should be interpreted by investigating specific service contexts. Positive outcomes significantly increase with co-creation; however, well-being seems to be a concept intertwined within the dyadic service relationship rather than a remote state of the consumer.","PeriodicalId":48173,"journal":{"name":"Service Industries Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02642069.2016.1138472","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedents and consequences of co-creation in credence-based service contexts\",\"authors\":\"Berna Tarı Kasnakoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02642069.2016.1138472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present study proposes that co-creation is a dialogical process which involves a high level of participation by both partners, and attempts to test a co-creation model, where partners engage in a service interaction using their operant resources. Results from 65 exploratory interviews and 502 scenario-based experiments demonstrate that operant resources lead to higher levels of participation; however, participation by one partner does not lead to co-creation unless the other partner is also participating, indicating the constructive effects of a mutually contributing relationship. Results also imply that co-creation is a highly contextual and interactive phenomenon, thus the dimensions and the effects of mutual participation should be interpreted by investigating specific service contexts. Positive outcomes significantly increase with co-creation; however, well-being seems to be a concept intertwined within the dyadic service relationship rather than a remote state of the consumer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Service Industries Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02642069.2016.1138472\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Service Industries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2016.1138472\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Service Industries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2016.1138472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

本研究提出,共同创造是一个对话过程,涉及双方的高水平参与,并试图测试一个共同创造模型,其中合作伙伴利用其运营资源参与服务交互。65个探索性访谈和502个基于场景的实验结果表明,操作性资源导致更高的参与水平;然而,一方的参与并不会导致共同创造,除非另一方也参与其中,这表明了一种相互促进的关系的建设性影响。研究结果还表明,共同创造是一种高度情境化和交互性的现象,因此相互参与的维度和影响应该通过调查特定的服务情境来解释。共同创造显著增加了积极结果;然而,幸福感似乎是一个与二元服务关系交织在一起的概念,而不是消费者的一种遥远状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antecedents and consequences of co-creation in credence-based service contexts
ABSTRACT The present study proposes that co-creation is a dialogical process which involves a high level of participation by both partners, and attempts to test a co-creation model, where partners engage in a service interaction using their operant resources. Results from 65 exploratory interviews and 502 scenario-based experiments demonstrate that operant resources lead to higher levels of participation; however, participation by one partner does not lead to co-creation unless the other partner is also participating, indicating the constructive effects of a mutually contributing relationship. Results also imply that co-creation is a highly contextual and interactive phenomenon, thus the dimensions and the effects of mutual participation should be interpreted by investigating specific service contexts. Positive outcomes significantly increase with co-creation; however, well-being seems to be a concept intertwined within the dyadic service relationship rather than a remote state of the consumer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
18.10%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The mission of The Service Industries Journal is to enhance our understanding of the services sector, service firms, and the efficient management of these entities. Pioneering the field since 1981, we stand as the world's inaugural academic, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the services sector and service management. Over the years, we have earned a prestigious international reputation for delivering high-quality content and insights. We enthusiastically invite submissions from researchers worldwide whose studies are grounded in social sciences such as sociology, psychology, economics, law, and politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信