租住权租住人的保障:基于巴伦诉黏土有限公司案的激烈言论

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Elsabé van der Sijde
{"title":"租住权租住人的保障:基于巴伦诉黏土有限公司案的激烈言论","authors":"Elsabé van der Sijde","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2020.1773308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scope and meaning of ‘secure tenure’ were central to two prominent Constitutional Court cases in 2017. The first case, Daniels v Scribante, is widely regarded as a progressive judgement that es...","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"36 1","pages":"74-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02587203.2020.1773308","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tenure security for ESTA occupiers: Building on the obiter remarks in Baron v Claytile Limited\",\"authors\":\"Elsabé van der Sijde\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2020.1773308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scope and meaning of ‘secure tenure’ were central to two prominent Constitutional Court cases in 2017. The first case, Daniels v Scribante, is widely regarded as a progressive judgement that es...\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"74-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02587203.2020.1773308\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1773308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1773308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

2017年,在两起著名的宪法法院案件中,“安全任期”的范围和含义是核心问题。第一个案例,丹尼尔斯诉斯克里班特案,被广泛认为是一个进步的判决……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tenure security for ESTA occupiers: Building on the obiter remarks in Baron v Claytile Limited
The scope and meaning of ‘secure tenure’ were central to two prominent Constitutional Court cases in 2017. The first case, Daniels v Scribante, is widely regarded as a progressive judgement that es...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信