使用两种方法评估环境清洁度:一项多中心的澳大利亚研究

Brett G. Mitchell PhD M AdvPrac DN BN , Fiona Wilson DipAppSci (Nsg) Grad Dip Adv Nsg (ID) SICC Grad Cert Nsg Mngmt , Anne Wells RN M Adv Prac IC&P
{"title":"使用两种方法评估环境清洁度:一项多中心的澳大利亚研究","authors":"Brett G. Mitchell PhD M AdvPrac DN BN ,&nbsp;Fiona Wilson DipAppSci (Nsg) Grad Dip Adv Nsg (ID) SICC Grad Cert Nsg Mngmt ,&nbsp;Anne Wells RN M Adv Prac IC&P","doi":"10.1071/HI15009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A standardised approach to evaluating environmental cleanliness is important to ensure consistency of assessor training, allow benchmarking of results between facilities, ensure consistency of the assessment of the environment and assist in meeting national accreditation standards. This paper describes the development process and the findings of the first 12 months of data following the introduction of a standardised program for evaluating environmental cleanliness within Tasmanian healthcare facilities using two different evaluation methods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Evaluation of environmental cleanliness was undertaken as part of a structured program and involved the use of an ultraviolet solution and fluorescent light in addition to a visual assessment. Twelve Tasmanian hospitals participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 290 fluorescent light assessments and 232 visual inspections were conducted. Using the fluorescent light assessment, the percentage of correctly cleaned items increased from a baseline of 82.3% to 85.4% overthe 12-month study period. Using the visual assessment, 92.5% ofitems were deemed acceptable during the study period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our multi-centred study identified a high baseline level of cleanliness using a fluorescent light. We identified that objects were frequently deemed to be visually acceptable, yet may not have been cleaned. The project was supported by a range of online tools for data submission, training tools and a formal assessment of auditors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI15009","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study\",\"authors\":\"Brett G. Mitchell PhD M AdvPrac DN BN ,&nbsp;Fiona Wilson DipAppSci (Nsg) Grad Dip Adv Nsg (ID) SICC Grad Cert Nsg Mngmt ,&nbsp;Anne Wells RN M Adv Prac IC&P\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HI15009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A standardised approach to evaluating environmental cleanliness is important to ensure consistency of assessor training, allow benchmarking of results between facilities, ensure consistency of the assessment of the environment and assist in meeting national accreditation standards. This paper describes the development process and the findings of the first 12 months of data following the introduction of a standardised program for evaluating environmental cleanliness within Tasmanian healthcare facilities using two different evaluation methods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Evaluation of environmental cleanliness was undertaken as part of a structured program and involved the use of an ultraviolet solution and fluorescent light in addition to a visual assessment. Twelve Tasmanian hospitals participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 290 fluorescent light assessments and 232 visual inspections were conducted. Using the fluorescent light assessment, the percentage of correctly cleaned items increased from a baseline of 82.3% to 85.4% overthe 12-month study period. Using the visual assessment, 92.5% ofitems were deemed acceptable during the study period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our multi-centred study identified a high baseline level of cleanliness using a fluorescent light. We identified that objects were frequently deemed to be visually acceptable, yet may not have been cleaned. The project was supported by a range of online tools for data submission, training tools and a formal assessment of auditors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI15009\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

环境清洁度评估的标准化方法对于确保评估员培训的一致性,允许在设施之间对结果进行基准测试,确保环境评估的一致性以及协助达到国家认证标准非常重要。本文描述了采用两种不同的评估方法对塔斯马尼亚保健设施内的环境清洁度进行评估的标准化方案实施后的发展过程和前12个月的数据调查结果。方法对环境清洁度进行评估,作为一个结构化程序的一部分,除了视觉评估外,还包括使用紫外线溶液和荧光灯。12家塔斯马尼亚医院参与了这项研究。结果共进行了290次荧光评估和232次目视检查。使用荧光灯评估,在12个月的研究期间,正确清洁物品的百分比从基线的82.3%增加到85.4%。使用视觉评估,92.5%的项目在研究期间被认为是可接受的。结论我们的多中心研究确定了使用荧光灯的高基线洁净度水平。我们发现这些物品经常被认为是视觉上可以接受的,但可能没有被清洁过。该项目得到了一系列在线数据提交工具、培训工具和审核员正式评估的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating environment cleanliness using two approaches: a multi-centred Australian study

Introduction

A standardised approach to evaluating environmental cleanliness is important to ensure consistency of assessor training, allow benchmarking of results between facilities, ensure consistency of the assessment of the environment and assist in meeting national accreditation standards. This paper describes the development process and the findings of the first 12 months of data following the introduction of a standardised program for evaluating environmental cleanliness within Tasmanian healthcare facilities using two different evaluation methods.

Methods

Evaluation of environmental cleanliness was undertaken as part of a structured program and involved the use of an ultraviolet solution and fluorescent light in addition to a visual assessment. Twelve Tasmanian hospitals participated in this study.

Results

A total of 290 fluorescent light assessments and 232 visual inspections were conducted. Using the fluorescent light assessment, the percentage of correctly cleaned items increased from a baseline of 82.3% to 85.4% overthe 12-month study period. Using the visual assessment, 92.5% ofitems were deemed acceptable during the study period.

Conclusions

Our multi-centred study identified a high baseline level of cleanliness using a fluorescent light. We identified that objects were frequently deemed to be visually acceptable, yet may not have been cleaned. The project was supported by a range of online tools for data submission, training tools and a formal assessment of auditors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信