使用频率和激活安全工程尖锐设备:尖锐的集装箱审计在五个澳大利亚首都城市

Terry Grimmond FASM, BAgrSc, GrDpAdEd
{"title":"使用频率和激活安全工程尖锐设备:尖锐的集装箱审计在五个澳大利亚首都城市","authors":"Terry Grimmond FASM, BAgrSc, GrDpAdEd","doi":"10.1071/HI14009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Sharps injuries (SI) among healthcare personnel (HCP) in Australia are of such concern the matter was brought before Parliament in 2013. Many SI from safety-engineered devices (SED) are due to nonactivation. Monitoring of activation is recommended. This paper outlines a sharps container (SC) contents audit conducted in Australian capital cities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Reusable, 22 L SC (Sharpsmart, Daniels Corporation, Melbourne) were randomly selected from random healthcare facilities (HCF) in five cities. Wearing protective apparel, the operator opened and decanted SC and sorted hollow-bore needles (HBN) into: capped <em>v.</em> uncapped non-SED, and activated or non-fully activated SED. Volumes and weights were recorded for inter-study comparisons. WinPepi v2.78 was used to calculate probability (significance set at ≤ 0.05), relative-risk and 95% confidence limits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1212 L of sharps (167.9 kg) from 102 SC from 27 hospitals were audited. Many devices were bloodcontaminated. Of the 9651 HBN, 30.4% were SED and 19.4% of the SED were not, or partially, activated. Of the 6718 non-SED, 30.6% were capped needles or capped needle-syringes. City averages for capped or naked sharps ranged from 64.2% (Sydney) to 97.8% (Adelaide) while hospital averages ranged from 32.6 to 100%. Overall, 54.2% of devices were discarded ‘sharp’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It is disturbing that 75.5% of hollow-bore needles were capped or naked, indicating a high proportion of Australian HCP are unnecessarily at risk of SI while handling sharps. The high non-use of SED and non-activation of SED needs researching.Widespread SED evaluation and adoption (automatic and semi-automatic SED where feasible), repetitive competency training and safety-ownership are needed. Legislation may be indicated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90514,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare infection","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages 95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI14009","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of use and activation of safety-engineered sharps devices: a sharps container audit in five Australian capital cities\",\"authors\":\"Terry Grimmond FASM, BAgrSc, GrDpAdEd\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HI14009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Sharps injuries (SI) among healthcare personnel (HCP) in Australia are of such concern the matter was brought before Parliament in 2013. Many SI from safety-engineered devices (SED) are due to nonactivation. Monitoring of activation is recommended. This paper outlines a sharps container (SC) contents audit conducted in Australian capital cities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Reusable, 22 L SC (Sharpsmart, Daniels Corporation, Melbourne) were randomly selected from random healthcare facilities (HCF) in five cities. Wearing protective apparel, the operator opened and decanted SC and sorted hollow-bore needles (HBN) into: capped <em>v.</em> uncapped non-SED, and activated or non-fully activated SED. Volumes and weights were recorded for inter-study comparisons. WinPepi v2.78 was used to calculate probability (significance set at ≤ 0.05), relative-risk and 95% confidence limits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1212 L of sharps (167.9 kg) from 102 SC from 27 hospitals were audited. Many devices were bloodcontaminated. Of the 9651 HBN, 30.4% were SED and 19.4% of the SED were not, or partially, activated. Of the 6718 non-SED, 30.6% were capped needles or capped needle-syringes. City averages for capped or naked sharps ranged from 64.2% (Sydney) to 97.8% (Adelaide) while hospital averages ranged from 32.6 to 100%. Overall, 54.2% of devices were discarded ‘sharp’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It is disturbing that 75.5% of hollow-bore needles were capped or naked, indicating a high proportion of Australian HCP are unnecessarily at risk of SI while handling sharps. The high non-use of SED and non-activation of SED needs researching.Widespread SED evaluation and adoption (automatic and semi-automatic SED where feasible), repetitive competency training and safety-ownership are needed. Legislation may be indicated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/HI14009\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1835561716300369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

澳大利亚医疗保健人员(HCP)中的锐器伤害(SI)引起了人们的关注,2013年这一问题被提交给了议会。许多来自安全工程设备(SED)的SI是由于非激活。建议监控激活情况。本文概述了在澳大利亚首都城市进行的尖锐容器(SC)内容审计。方法从5个城市的随机医疗机构(HCF)中随机抽取可重复使用的22张lsc (Sharpsmart, Daniels Corporation, Melbourne)。操作员穿着防护服,打开并倒入SC,并将空心针(HBN)分类为:带帽的和未带帽的非SED,激活的或未完全激活的SED。记录体积和重量用于研究间比较。使用WinPepi v2.78计算概率(显著性≤0.05)、相对风险和95%置信限。结果27家医院102家SC共检出尖锐物1212 L (167.9 kg)。许多设备都被血污染了。在9651个HBN中,30.4%是SED, 19.4%没有或部分激活。在6718名非sed患者中,30.6%是带帽针头或带帽针头注射器。城市的平均值从64.2%(悉尼)到97.8%(阿德莱德)不等,而医院的平均值从32.6%到100%不等。总体而言,54.2%的设备被“尖锐”地丢弃。结论令人不安的是,75.5%的空心针头被盖住或裸露,这表明澳大利亚HCP在处理利器时有很高的不必要的SI风险。SED高不利用率和SED不活化问题需要进一步研究。广泛的SED评估和采用(在可行的情况下自动和半自动SED)、重复的能力培训和安全所有权是必要的。可以指出立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency of use and activation of safety-engineered sharps devices: a sharps container audit in five Australian capital cities

Introduction

Sharps injuries (SI) among healthcare personnel (HCP) in Australia are of such concern the matter was brought before Parliament in 2013. Many SI from safety-engineered devices (SED) are due to nonactivation. Monitoring of activation is recommended. This paper outlines a sharps container (SC) contents audit conducted in Australian capital cities.

Methods

Reusable, 22 L SC (Sharpsmart, Daniels Corporation, Melbourne) were randomly selected from random healthcare facilities (HCF) in five cities. Wearing protective apparel, the operator opened and decanted SC and sorted hollow-bore needles (HBN) into: capped v. uncapped non-SED, and activated or non-fully activated SED. Volumes and weights were recorded for inter-study comparisons. WinPepi v2.78 was used to calculate probability (significance set at ≤ 0.05), relative-risk and 95% confidence limits.

Results

1212 L of sharps (167.9 kg) from 102 SC from 27 hospitals were audited. Many devices were bloodcontaminated. Of the 9651 HBN, 30.4% were SED and 19.4% of the SED were not, or partially, activated. Of the 6718 non-SED, 30.6% were capped needles or capped needle-syringes. City averages for capped or naked sharps ranged from 64.2% (Sydney) to 97.8% (Adelaide) while hospital averages ranged from 32.6 to 100%. Overall, 54.2% of devices were discarded ‘sharp’.

Conclusions

It is disturbing that 75.5% of hollow-bore needles were capped or naked, indicating a high proportion of Australian HCP are unnecessarily at risk of SI while handling sharps. The high non-use of SED and non-activation of SED needs researching.Widespread SED evaluation and adoption (automatic and semi-automatic SED where feasible), repetitive competency training and safety-ownership are needed. Legislation may be indicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信