家庭研究中的方法与困惑:综述。

IF 1.6 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Historical Methods Pub Date : 1989-04-01 DOI:10.1080/01615440.1989.10594179

James E. Smith

引用次数: 3

摘要

史蒂芬·拉格斯对这项研究发表了一篇批判性的评论，题为《长期联系:19世纪英美大家庭的兴起》。辩论涉及过去核心家庭普遍存在的证据。(注释)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Method and confusion in the study of the household: a review.

A critical review is presented of the study by Steven Ruggles entitled Prolonged Connections: the Rise of the Extended Family in Nineteenth-Century England and America. The debate concerns the evidence for the prevalence of the nuclear family in the past. (ANNOTATION)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Historical Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Historical Methodsreaches an international audience of social scientists concerned with historical problems. It explores interdisciplinary approaches to new data sources, new approaches to older questions and material, and practical discussions of computer and statistical methodology, data collection, and sampling procedures. The journal includes the following features: “Evidence Matters” emphasizes how to find, decipher, and analyze evidence whether or not that evidence is meant to be quantified. “Database Developments” announces major new public databases or large alterations in older ones, discusses innovative ways to organize them, and explains new ways of categorizing information.