使用人口登记册进行生育率分析的方法问题。

IF 1.6 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Historical Methods Pub Date : 1983-01-01 DOI:10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105

S. Watkins, M. Gutmann

{"title":"使用人口登记册进行生育率分析的方法问题。","authors":"S. Watkins, M. Gutmann","doi":"10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some problems encountered in using population registers to study the process of fertility decline are described using the example of La Hulpe Belgium during the nineteenth century. Particular attention is paid to potential biases introduced into both traditional and nontraditional demographic measures by the characteristics of the population register. Consideration is given to when the exposure to risk of pregnancy begins and ends to problems of time and space and to how the data available can be used to measure the process of fertility decline. (ANNOTATION)","PeriodicalId":45535,"journal":{"name":"Historical Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological issues in the use of population registers for fertility analysis.\",\"authors\":\"S. Watkins, M. Gutmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some problems encountered in using population registers to study the process of fertility decline are described using the example of La Hulpe Belgium during the nineteenth century. Particular attention is paid to potential biases introduced into both traditional and nontraditional demographic measures by the characteristics of the population register. Consideration is given to when the exposure to risk of pregnancy begins and ends to problems of time and space and to how the data available can be used to measure the process of fertility decline. (ANNOTATION)\",\"PeriodicalId\":45535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.1983.10594105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

本文以19世纪比利时的拉胡尔佩为例，描述了利用人口登记研究生育率下降过程中遇到的一些问题。特别注意到由于人口登记的特点而给传统和非传统人口计量带来的潜在偏差。考虑到怀孕风险何时开始和结束、时间和空间问题以及如何利用现有数据来衡量生育率下降的过程。(注释)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Methodological issues in the use of population registers for fertility analysis.

Some problems encountered in using population registers to study the process of fertility decline are described using the example of La Hulpe Belgium during the nineteenth century. Particular attention is paid to potential biases introduced into both traditional and nontraditional demographic measures by the characteristics of the population register. Consideration is given to when the exposure to risk of pregnancy begins and ends to problems of time and space and to how the data available can be used to measure the process of fertility decline. (ANNOTATION)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Historical Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Historical Methodsreaches an international audience of social scientists concerned with historical problems. It explores interdisciplinary approaches to new data sources, new approaches to older questions and material, and practical discussions of computer and statistical methodology, data collection, and sampling procedures. The journal includes the following features: “Evidence Matters” emphasizes how to find, decipher, and analyze evidence whether or not that evidence is meant to be quantified. “Database Developments” announces major new public databases or large alterations in older ones, discusses innovative ways to organize them, and explains new ways of categorizing information.