乳杆菌(L. acidophilus NCIB1899, L. casei CRL 431, L. paracasei LP33)发酵对藜麦品种游离和结合多酚抗氧化活性的影响

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jigang Zhang, Xudong Huang, Jianghua Cheng, Chuyan Wang
{"title":"乳杆菌(L. acidophilus NCIB1899, L. casei CRL 431, L. paracasei LP33)发酵对藜麦品种游离和结合多酚抗氧化活性的影响","authors":"Jigang Zhang,&nbsp;Xudong Huang,&nbsp;Jianghua Cheng,&nbsp;Chuyan Wang","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.16604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>The application of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation to the production of probiotic beverages is a common method for modifying the health-related functional characteristics and phytochemical content of such beverages. This study evaluated the effect of fermentation with <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> NCIB1899<i>, Lactobacillus casei</i> CRL 431, and <i>Lactobacillus paracasei</i> LP33 on the total phenolic contents (PCs), flavonoid contents (FCs), phenolic profiles, and antioxidant capacities of the solvent-extractable (free) and cell-wall-bound (bound) fractions in quinoa varying in bran color. Compared with unfermented beverages, LAB fermentation significantly increased the free PCs and free FCs by 15.7%–79.4% and 7.6%–84.3%, respectively. The bound PCs increased, whereas bound FCs decreased in fermented black and red quinoa juice. The increments of procyanidin B<sub>2</sub>, protocatechuic acid, <i>p</i>-hydroxybenzaldehyde, rutin, and kaempferol through 30 h fermentation exceeded 189%–622%, 13.8%–191%, 55.6%–100%, 48.5%–129%, and 120%–325%, respectively. However, the contents of catechin, procyanidin B<sub>1</sub>, and ferulic acid decreased with fermentation. Overall, <i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899, <i>L. casei</i> CRL431, and <i>L. paracasei</i> LP33 strains may be suitable for producing fermented quinoa probiotic beverages. <i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899 was superior for fermentation to <i>L. casei</i> CRL431 and <i>L. paracasei</i> LP33. Red and black quinoa had significantly higher total (sum of free and bound) PC and FC concentrations and antioxidant capacities than white quinoa (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) because of their higher concentrations of proanthocyanins and polyphenol, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Application</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, different LAB (<i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899, <i>L. casei</i> CRL431, and <i>L. paracasei</i> LP33) were singly inoculated on aqueous solutions from quinoa to ferment probiotic beverage and to compare the metabolic capacity of LAB strains on nonnutritive phytochemicals (phenolic compounds). We observed that LAB fermentation greatly enhanced the phenolic and antioxidant activity of quinoa. The comparison indicated that the <i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899 strain has the highest fermentation metabolic capacity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Lactobacillus (L. acidophilus NCIB1899, L. casei CRL 431, L. paracasei LP33) fermentation on free and bound polyphenolic, antioxidant activities in three Chenopodium quinoa cultivars\",\"authors\":\"Jigang Zhang,&nbsp;Xudong Huang,&nbsp;Jianghua Cheng,&nbsp;Chuyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.16604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n \\n <p>The application of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation to the production of probiotic beverages is a common method for modifying the health-related functional characteristics and phytochemical content of such beverages. This study evaluated the effect of fermentation with <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> NCIB1899<i>, Lactobacillus casei</i> CRL 431, and <i>Lactobacillus paracasei</i> LP33 on the total phenolic contents (PCs), flavonoid contents (FCs), phenolic profiles, and antioxidant capacities of the solvent-extractable (free) and cell-wall-bound (bound) fractions in quinoa varying in bran color. Compared with unfermented beverages, LAB fermentation significantly increased the free PCs and free FCs by 15.7%–79.4% and 7.6%–84.3%, respectively. The bound PCs increased, whereas bound FCs decreased in fermented black and red quinoa juice. The increments of procyanidin B<sub>2</sub>, protocatechuic acid, <i>p</i>-hydroxybenzaldehyde, rutin, and kaempferol through 30 h fermentation exceeded 189%–622%, 13.8%–191%, 55.6%–100%, 48.5%–129%, and 120%–325%, respectively. However, the contents of catechin, procyanidin B<sub>1</sub>, and ferulic acid decreased with fermentation. Overall, <i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899, <i>L. casei</i> CRL431, and <i>L. paracasei</i> LP33 strains may be suitable for producing fermented quinoa probiotic beverages. <i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899 was superior for fermentation to <i>L. casei</i> CRL431 and <i>L. paracasei</i> LP33. Red and black quinoa had significantly higher total (sum of free and bound) PC and FC concentrations and antioxidant capacities than white quinoa (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) because of their higher concentrations of proanthocyanins and polyphenol, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practical Application</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, different LAB (<i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899, <i>L. casei</i> CRL431, and <i>L. paracasei</i> LP33) were singly inoculated on aqueous solutions from quinoa to ferment probiotic beverage and to compare the metabolic capacity of LAB strains on nonnutritive phytochemicals (phenolic compounds). We observed that LAB fermentation greatly enhanced the phenolic and antioxidant activity of quinoa. The comparison indicated that the <i>L. acidophilus</i> NCIB1899 strain has the highest fermentation metabolic capacity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.16604\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.16604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

将乳酸菌(LAB)发酵应用于益生菌饮料的生产,是改变此类饮料与健康相关的功能特性和植物化学成分含量的常用方法。本研究评价了嗜酸乳杆菌NCIB1899、干酪乳杆菌CRL 431和副干酪乳杆菌LP33对不同麸皮颜色的藜麦中溶剂萃取(游离)和细胞壁结合(结合)组分的总酚含量(PCs)、类黄酮含量(fc)、酚谱和抗氧化能力的影响。与未发酵饮料相比,乳酸菌发酵可显著提高游离pc和游离fc含量,分别提高15.7% ~ 79.4%和7.6% ~ 84.3%。黑藜麦和红藜麦发酵后,结合pc增加,结合fc减少。发酵30 h,原花青素B2、原儿茶酸、对羟基苯甲醛、芦丁、山奈酚的增加量分别超过189% ~ 622%、13.8% ~ 191%、55.6% ~ 100%、48.5% ~ 129%、120% ~ 325%。儿茶素、原花青素B1和阿魏酸含量随发酵而降低。综上所述,嗜酸乳杆菌NCIB1899、干酪乳杆菌CRL431和副干酪乳杆菌LP33菌株可能适合生产发酵藜麦益生菌饮料。嗜酸乳杆菌NCIB1899发酵效果优于干酪乳杆菌CRL431和副干酪乳杆菌LP33。红藜麦和黑藜麦的总游离和结合PC和FC浓度和抗氧化能力显著高于白藜麦(p <0.05),因为它们分别含有较高的原花青素和多酚。本研究将不同的乳酸菌(L. acidophilus NCIB1899、L. casei CRL431和L. paracasei LP33)单独接种于藜麦水溶液中发酵益生菌饮料,比较不同乳酸菌菌株对非营养性植物化学物质(酚类化合物)的代谢能力。结果表明,乳酸发酵能显著提高藜麦的酚类和抗氧化活性。结果表明,嗜酸乳杆菌NCIB1899菌株具有最高的发酵代谢能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Lactobacillus (L. acidophilus NCIB1899, L. casei CRL 431, L. paracasei LP33) fermentation on free and bound polyphenolic, antioxidant activities in three Chenopodium quinoa cultivars

The application of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation to the production of probiotic beverages is a common method for modifying the health-related functional characteristics and phytochemical content of such beverages. This study evaluated the effect of fermentation with Lactobacillus acidophilus NCIB1899, Lactobacillus casei CRL 431, and Lactobacillus paracasei LP33 on the total phenolic contents (PCs), flavonoid contents (FCs), phenolic profiles, and antioxidant capacities of the solvent-extractable (free) and cell-wall-bound (bound) fractions in quinoa varying in bran color. Compared with unfermented beverages, LAB fermentation significantly increased the free PCs and free FCs by 15.7%–79.4% and 7.6%–84.3%, respectively. The bound PCs increased, whereas bound FCs decreased in fermented black and red quinoa juice. The increments of procyanidin B2, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, rutin, and kaempferol through 30 h fermentation exceeded 189%–622%, 13.8%–191%, 55.6%–100%, 48.5%–129%, and 120%–325%, respectively. However, the contents of catechin, procyanidin B1, and ferulic acid decreased with fermentation. Overall, L. acidophilus NCIB1899, L. casei CRL431, and L. paracasei LP33 strains may be suitable for producing fermented quinoa probiotic beverages. L. acidophilus NCIB1899 was superior for fermentation to L. casei CRL431 and L. paracasei LP33. Red and black quinoa had significantly higher total (sum of free and bound) PC and FC concentrations and antioxidant capacities than white quinoa (p < 0.05) because of their higher concentrations of proanthocyanins and polyphenol, respectively.

Practical Application

In this study, different LAB (L. acidophilus NCIB1899, L. casei CRL431, and L. paracasei LP33) were singly inoculated on aqueous solutions from quinoa to ferment probiotic beverage and to compare the metabolic capacity of LAB strains on nonnutritive phytochemicals (phenolic compounds). We observed that LAB fermentation greatly enhanced the phenolic and antioxidant activity of quinoa. The comparison indicated that the L. acidophilus NCIB1899 strain has the highest fermentation metabolic capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信