知识权威和制度权威。

IF 0.2 4区社会学 Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Legal Education Pub Date : 1992-06-01 DOI:10.1080/00201749208602286

C. Collier

{"title":"知识权威和制度权威。","authors":"C. Collier","doi":"10.1080/00201749208602286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers a defense of ‘intellectual authority’, primarily by pointing out the untoward implications of its conceptual opposite, ‘institutional authority’, in a wide variety of contexts. An opening discussion explores conditions for the possibility of intellectual authority in legal, humanistic, and aesthetic disciplines. Social science literature documenting and describing the biasing influence of institutional authority is then canvassed and analyzed in some detail. A final section assays the theoretical significance of various efforts to eliminate non‐intellectual bias and influence, with special reference to the example of “blind reviewing’ of scholarly manuscripts.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00201749208602286","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual Authority and Institutional Authority.\",\"authors\":\"C. Collier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00201749208602286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay offers a defense of ‘intellectual authority’, primarily by pointing out the untoward implications of its conceptual opposite, ‘institutional authority’, in a wide variety of contexts. An opening discussion explores conditions for the possibility of intellectual authority in legal, humanistic, and aesthetic disciplines. Social science literature documenting and describing the biasing influence of institutional authority is then canvassed and analyzed in some detail. A final section assays the theoretical significance of various efforts to eliminate non‐intellectual bias and influence, with special reference to the example of “blind reviewing’ of scholarly manuscripts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00201749208602286\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

这篇文章为“知识权威”提供了辩护，主要是通过指出其概念对立面“制度权威”在各种各样的背景下的不利含义。开篇讨论探讨了法律、人文和美学学科中知识权威可能性的条件。社会科学文献记录和描述了制度权威的偏见影响，然后进行了详细的调查和分析。最后一节分析了消除非智力偏见和影响的各种努力的理论意义，特别提到了对学术手稿的“盲目审查”的例子。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Intellectual Authority and Institutional Authority.

This essay offers a defense of ‘intellectual authority’, primarily by pointing out the untoward implications of its conceptual opposite, ‘institutional authority’, in a wide variety of contexts. An opening discussion explores conditions for the possibility of intellectual authority in legal, humanistic, and aesthetic disciplines. Social science literature documenting and describing the biasing influence of institutional authority is then canvassed and analyzed in some detail. A final section assays the theoretical significance of various efforts to eliminate non‐intellectual bias and influence, with special reference to the example of “blind reviewing’ of scholarly manuscripts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.