西班牙银行业的成本、收入和业绩:危机前和危机初期的比较分析

IF 0.9 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Diego Prior, Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, M. García-Alcober, Manuel Illueca
{"title":"西班牙银行业的成本、收入和业绩:危机前和危机初期的比较分析","authors":"Diego Prior, Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, M. García-Alcober, Manuel Illueca","doi":"10.1080/02102412.2016.1193971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The literature analysing the efficiency of financial institutions has evolved rapidly over the last 20 years. Most research has focused on the input side, analysing either cost, input technical efficiency or input allocative efficiency, whereas comparatively fewer studies have examined the revenue side. However, both sides are relevant when evaluating banks’ performance. This article explicitly explores how serious it may be to confine the analysis to one side of banks’ activities only, comparing the efficiencies yielded by either minimising costs or maximising revenues. We focus on the Spanish banking sector, which is currently undergoing a profound process of change and restructuring. The application shows how severely biased the analysis is when only a partial efficiency measurement is conducted. It also shows the growing relevance of the issue since the beginning of the financial crisis.","PeriodicalId":45271,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting-Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad","volume":"45 1","pages":"345 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02102412.2016.1193971","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs, revenues and performance in Spanish banking: a comparative analysis of pre- and early crisis years\",\"authors\":\"Diego Prior, Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, M. García-Alcober, Manuel Illueca\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02102412.2016.1193971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The literature analysing the efficiency of financial institutions has evolved rapidly over the last 20 years. Most research has focused on the input side, analysing either cost, input technical efficiency or input allocative efficiency, whereas comparatively fewer studies have examined the revenue side. However, both sides are relevant when evaluating banks’ performance. This article explicitly explores how serious it may be to confine the analysis to one side of banks’ activities only, comparing the efficiencies yielded by either minimising costs or maximising revenues. We focus on the Spanish banking sector, which is currently undergoing a profound process of change and restructuring. The application shows how severely biased the analysis is when only a partial efficiency measurement is conducted. It also shows the growing relevance of the issue since the beginning of the financial crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting-Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"345 - 364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02102412.2016.1193971\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting-Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2016.1193971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting-Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2016.1193971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在过去的20年里,分析金融机构效率的文献发展迅速。大多数研究集中在投入方面,分析成本、投入技术效率或投入配置效率,而对收入方面的研究相对较少。然而,在评估银行业绩时,这两方面都是相关的。本文明确地探讨了将分析仅限于银行活动的一个方面,比较成本最小化或收入最大化所产生的效率是多么严重。我们的重点是西班牙银行业,该部门目前正在经历深刻的变革和重组过程。应用表明,当只进行部分效率测量时,分析有多么严重的偏差。这也表明,自金融危机开始以来,这个问题的相关性日益增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Costs, revenues and performance in Spanish banking: a comparative analysis of pre- and early crisis years
ABSTRACT The literature analysing the efficiency of financial institutions has evolved rapidly over the last 20 years. Most research has focused on the input side, analysing either cost, input technical efficiency or input allocative efficiency, whereas comparatively fewer studies have examined the revenue side. However, both sides are relevant when evaluating banks’ performance. This article explicitly explores how serious it may be to confine the analysis to one side of banks’ activities only, comparing the efficiencies yielded by either minimising costs or maximising revenues. We focus on the Spanish banking sector, which is currently undergoing a profound process of change and restructuring. The application shows how severely biased the analysis is when only a partial efficiency measurement is conducted. It also shows the growing relevance of the issue since the beginning of the financial crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting ( SJFA) is a quarterly academic journal founded in 1972. It aims to publish high quality research papers in accounting and finance. The scope of SJFA covers theoretical and empirical analysis relating to financial markets and institutions, corporate finance, market microstructure, corporate governance, internal and management accounting and a wide spectrum of financial performance and financial reporting, including auditing and public accounting. The Journal welcomes both theoretical and empirical contributions, and in particular, theoretical papers that yield novel testable implications and empirical papers that are theoretically well motivated. The journal is not a suitable outlet for highly abstract mathematical papers or empirical papers with inadequate theoretical motivation. All manuscripts that meet these editorial guidelines are blind reviewed by external reviewers. SJFA sponsors a periodic conference in which selected papers under review are presented and discussed by additional reviewers in order to increase the quality of the papers published in the journal. If accepted for publication, these selected articles are published in the Journal with a special distinction. The Journal welcomes replies and discussions to both published and forthcoming articles. These contributions, if accepted by the editors, may eventually be published jointly with a reply or comment by the authors of the original paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信