医学插画家协会第35届年会,2002年9月11-13日,德比

S. Young
{"title":"医学插画家协会第35届年会,2002年9月11-13日,德比","authors":"S. Young","doi":"10.1080/0140511031000091301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 35th Annual IMI Conference was held at the Mickleover Court Hotel in Derby and, as has become standard practice, opened after lunch on Wednesday. The first session was chaired by IMI Chairman Carol Fleming who introduced Dr Susan Hill, the keynote speaker. Dr Hill had just taken up appointment as the Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) and gave the delegates an update on the Healthcare Scientists project as well as an insight into her philosophy as the CSO. Dr Hill’s presentation set the theme for the session and she was followed by Martin Johns who took us through the latest on consent and confidentiality. Next was Jane Tovey who did a short presentation about Standards Audits. Jane is involved in the IMI Standards Pilot Scheme and a number of departments have already put themselves forward to participate in an audit of their policies and procedures. Delegates were asked to take part in a short exercise to assess their own department policies. The results seemed sketchy and in some cases varied depending upon whether it was managers or staff at the coal face answering the questions. Madeleine Borg spoke on ‘Clinical Governance’, and David Bryson gave us an insight into ‘Learning together, Working together’ Finally Simon Brown gave a presentation entitled ‘Whither Medical Illustration?’ where he argued that we are in danger of becoming ‘jacks of all trades’. Thursday morning started with the ‘New Voices in Medical Illustration’. This session has now become one of the highlights of the scientific programme, consisting of ten-minute presentations, many drawn from the BSc students’ final projects. This year was a little disappointing in terms of numbers of papers, but not in terms of quality and variety of presentations. The first speaker, Carolyn Bray, focused her attentions on the topic of body mapping in clinical photography. This was of particular interest to departments that undertake this type of photography and was an account of how her department had set about examining their current practice and made changes based on customer feedback. Next was Sarah Murfin who spoke about her personal experience of pre-eclampsia and how health professionals can assist in the design of patient information. Peter Murray then continued the session with a talk about the ‘Comparison of quality schemes’. Kellie Pearson’s presentation was entitled ‘The second skeleton’, a look at the condition fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. The session was concluded by Norm Barker (not a ‘New Voice’ presentation) with an interesting and beautifully-illustrated talk about natural science photography. After coffee, Ed Bremner began the next plenary session with the topic of ‘Asset management’ during which he examined the importance of managing visual digital assets (image storage, databasing and retrieval). Mike Nelson then entertained us for twenty minutes relating the establishment of Medical Illustration UK Ltd. – effectively a management buy-out. Although not for everybody, it was interesting to hear about his department’s development into the commercial world. Next was a presentation entitled ‘Benchmarking – another can of worms’, from Keith Bellamy. Keith informed us of the latest IMI initiative to try and identify the relationship between medical illustration workload and hospital case-mix. Simon Dove from the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital discussed his department in relation to obtaining the Charter Mark award. Finally in this session, David Smithson gave an introduction to the IMI Archive issuing a heartfelt plea to fellow members to supply him with much-needed images. After another generous lunch, the afternoon session consisted of a wide range of topics of interest across the board. Sean Brennan gave the delegates an update on the EPR project; not much progress it seems since he first spoke to us on the topic several years ago. Shirley Smith and her team introduced the delegates to Diabeta3, a commercial clinical information system developed at St Thomas’ Hospital to manage the diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Richard Cragg delivered an overview of the use of indocyanine green dye, tracing its early history and ‘rediscovery’ since digital imaging. Ophthalmologist Mike Briggs gave a very informative talk on age-related macular degeneration and the use of photodynamic therapy to treat the condition. The next session, chaired by Madeleine Borg, began with Jason Candlin who talked of the problems caused in his department by the introduction of the NHS identity and logo. This has ultimately resulted in a reduction of workload from the administration and a concentration of support for clinical practice. Then there was a slight alteration in the scheduled plan due to a technical hitch. Sophie Jones saved the day by stepping in early with her talk about ‘Telemedicine in acute plastic trauma’. An interesting insight into how a small group of clinicians set up a very focused telemedicine project. Having sorted out the computer gremlins, Jon Rimmer gave an entertaining talk about the relationship of design and computer usability. The Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 36–38","PeriodicalId":76645,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":"36 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0140511031000091301","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Institute of Medical Illustrators' 35th Annual Conference, Derby, September 11-13, 2002\",\"authors\":\"S. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0140511031000091301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 35th Annual IMI Conference was held at the Mickleover Court Hotel in Derby and, as has become standard practice, opened after lunch on Wednesday. The first session was chaired by IMI Chairman Carol Fleming who introduced Dr Susan Hill, the keynote speaker. Dr Hill had just taken up appointment as the Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) and gave the delegates an update on the Healthcare Scientists project as well as an insight into her philosophy as the CSO. Dr Hill’s presentation set the theme for the session and she was followed by Martin Johns who took us through the latest on consent and confidentiality. Next was Jane Tovey who did a short presentation about Standards Audits. Jane is involved in the IMI Standards Pilot Scheme and a number of departments have already put themselves forward to participate in an audit of their policies and procedures. Delegates were asked to take part in a short exercise to assess their own department policies. The results seemed sketchy and in some cases varied depending upon whether it was managers or staff at the coal face answering the questions. Madeleine Borg spoke on ‘Clinical Governance’, and David Bryson gave us an insight into ‘Learning together, Working together’ Finally Simon Brown gave a presentation entitled ‘Whither Medical Illustration?’ where he argued that we are in danger of becoming ‘jacks of all trades’. Thursday morning started with the ‘New Voices in Medical Illustration’. This session has now become one of the highlights of the scientific programme, consisting of ten-minute presentations, many drawn from the BSc students’ final projects. This year was a little disappointing in terms of numbers of papers, but not in terms of quality and variety of presentations. The first speaker, Carolyn Bray, focused her attentions on the topic of body mapping in clinical photography. This was of particular interest to departments that undertake this type of photography and was an account of how her department had set about examining their current practice and made changes based on customer feedback. Next was Sarah Murfin who spoke about her personal experience of pre-eclampsia and how health professionals can assist in the design of patient information. Peter Murray then continued the session with a talk about the ‘Comparison of quality schemes’. Kellie Pearson’s presentation was entitled ‘The second skeleton’, a look at the condition fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. The session was concluded by Norm Barker (not a ‘New Voice’ presentation) with an interesting and beautifully-illustrated talk about natural science photography. After coffee, Ed Bremner began the next plenary session with the topic of ‘Asset management’ during which he examined the importance of managing visual digital assets (image storage, databasing and retrieval). Mike Nelson then entertained us for twenty minutes relating the establishment of Medical Illustration UK Ltd. – effectively a management buy-out. Although not for everybody, it was interesting to hear about his department’s development into the commercial world. Next was a presentation entitled ‘Benchmarking – another can of worms’, from Keith Bellamy. Keith informed us of the latest IMI initiative to try and identify the relationship between medical illustration workload and hospital case-mix. Simon Dove from the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital discussed his department in relation to obtaining the Charter Mark award. Finally in this session, David Smithson gave an introduction to the IMI Archive issuing a heartfelt plea to fellow members to supply him with much-needed images. After another generous lunch, the afternoon session consisted of a wide range of topics of interest across the board. Sean Brennan gave the delegates an update on the EPR project; not much progress it seems since he first spoke to us on the topic several years ago. Shirley Smith and her team introduced the delegates to Diabeta3, a commercial clinical information system developed at St Thomas’ Hospital to manage the diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Richard Cragg delivered an overview of the use of indocyanine green dye, tracing its early history and ‘rediscovery’ since digital imaging. Ophthalmologist Mike Briggs gave a very informative talk on age-related macular degeneration and the use of photodynamic therapy to treat the condition. The next session, chaired by Madeleine Borg, began with Jason Candlin who talked of the problems caused in his department by the introduction of the NHS identity and logo. This has ultimately resulted in a reduction of workload from the administration and a concentration of support for clinical practice. Then there was a slight alteration in the scheduled plan due to a technical hitch. Sophie Jones saved the day by stepping in early with her talk about ‘Telemedicine in acute plastic trauma’. An interesting insight into how a small group of clinicians set up a very focused telemedicine project. Having sorted out the computer gremlins, Jon Rimmer gave an entertaining talk about the relationship of design and computer usability. The Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 36–38\",\"PeriodicalId\":76645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0140511031000091301\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0140511031000091301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0140511031000091301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第35届IMI年会在德比的米克利奥弗宫酒店举行,按照惯例,会议于周三午餐后开幕。第一届会议由IMI主席Carol Fleming主持,她介绍了主讲人Susan Hill博士。希尔博士刚刚被任命为首席科学官(CSO),她向代表们介绍了医疗科学家项目的最新情况,并深入介绍了她作为首席科学官的理念。希尔博士的演讲确定了会议的主题,随后是马丁·约翰斯他向我们介绍了同意和保密的最新情况。接下来是简·托维,她做了一个关于标准审计的简短介绍。简参与了IMI标准试点计划,许多部门已经提出要参与对其政策和程序的审计。代表们被要求参加一个简短的练习,以评估他们自己部门的政策。结果似乎是粗略的,在某些情况下,根据是管理人员还是采煤工作面的工作人员回答问题而有所不同。玛德琳·博格就“临床治理”发表了演讲,大卫·布莱森让我们深入了解了“共同学习,共同努力”最后,西蒙·布朗做了题为“医学插图向何处去?”,他认为我们正处于成为“万事通”的危险之中。周四上午,我们从“医学插图中的新声音”开始。这个环节现在已经成为科学项目的亮点之一,由10分钟的演讲组成,其中许多来自理学士学生的期末项目。今年在论文数量方面有点令人失望,但在质量和演讲的多样性方面却没有。第一位发言者卡罗琳·布雷(Carolyn Bray)将她的注意力集中在临床摄影中的身体测绘这一主题上。这对从事这类摄影的部门来说是特别有趣的,也是她的部门如何着手检查他们目前的做法,并根据客户反馈做出改变的叙述。接下来是Sarah Murfin,她讲述了自己的先兆子痫的个人经历,以及健康专业人员如何帮助设计患者信息。彼得·穆雷接着就“质量方案的比较”进行了演讲。Kellie Pearson的报告题为“第二副骨架”,介绍了进行性骨化纤维发育不良的情况。会议由Norm Barker(不是“New Voice”的演讲嘉宾)以一段有趣且配有精美插图的自然科学摄影演讲结束。喝完咖啡后,Ed Bremner以“资产管理”为主题开始了下一个全体会议,在此期间,他检查了管理视觉数字资产(图像存储,数据库和检索)的重要性。迈克·纳尔逊然后招待我们20分钟有关建立医疗插图英国有限公司-有效的管理层收购。虽然不是每个人都感兴趣,但听到他的部门发展到商业世界还是很有趣的。接下来是基斯·贝拉米做的题为“标杆管理——另一个棘手问题”的演讲。Keith向我们介绍了IMI的最新举措,即试图确定医学插图工作量与医院病例组合之间的关系。诺福克和诺维奇大学医院的西蒙·多夫讨论了他所在部门获得特许标志奖的情况。最后,David Smithson向IMI Archive作了介绍,并真诚地请求其他成员为他提供急需的图像。在又一顿丰盛的午餐之后,下午的会议包括了广泛的话题,大家都感兴趣。肖恩·布伦南向代表们介绍了EPR项目的最新情况;自从几年前他第一次对我们谈论这个话题以来,似乎没有多大进展。Shirley Smith和她的团队向代表们介绍了Diabeta3,这是一个由圣托马斯医院开发的商业临床信息系统,用于管理糖尿病视网膜病变筛查项目。Richard Cragg概述了吲哚菁绿色染料的使用,追溯了它的早期历史和自数字成像以来的“重新发现”。眼科医生迈克·布里格斯就老年性黄斑变性和使用光动力疗法治疗黄斑变性做了一个非常翔实的演讲。下一个会议由玛德琳·博格主持,由杰森·坎德林开始,他谈到了引入NHS标识和标志给他的部门带来的问题。这最终减少了行政工作量,并集中了对临床实践的支持。然后,由于技术故障,原定的计划有了一个小小的改变。索菲·琼斯(Sophie Jones)提前发表了“急性塑性创伤的远程医疗”的演讲,挽救了局面。关于一小群临床医生如何建立一个非常专注的远程医疗项目的有趣见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Institute of Medical Illustrators' 35th Annual Conference, Derby, September 11-13, 2002
The 35th Annual IMI Conference was held at the Mickleover Court Hotel in Derby and, as has become standard practice, opened after lunch on Wednesday. The first session was chaired by IMI Chairman Carol Fleming who introduced Dr Susan Hill, the keynote speaker. Dr Hill had just taken up appointment as the Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) and gave the delegates an update on the Healthcare Scientists project as well as an insight into her philosophy as the CSO. Dr Hill’s presentation set the theme for the session and she was followed by Martin Johns who took us through the latest on consent and confidentiality. Next was Jane Tovey who did a short presentation about Standards Audits. Jane is involved in the IMI Standards Pilot Scheme and a number of departments have already put themselves forward to participate in an audit of their policies and procedures. Delegates were asked to take part in a short exercise to assess their own department policies. The results seemed sketchy and in some cases varied depending upon whether it was managers or staff at the coal face answering the questions. Madeleine Borg spoke on ‘Clinical Governance’, and David Bryson gave us an insight into ‘Learning together, Working together’ Finally Simon Brown gave a presentation entitled ‘Whither Medical Illustration?’ where he argued that we are in danger of becoming ‘jacks of all trades’. Thursday morning started with the ‘New Voices in Medical Illustration’. This session has now become one of the highlights of the scientific programme, consisting of ten-minute presentations, many drawn from the BSc students’ final projects. This year was a little disappointing in terms of numbers of papers, but not in terms of quality and variety of presentations. The first speaker, Carolyn Bray, focused her attentions on the topic of body mapping in clinical photography. This was of particular interest to departments that undertake this type of photography and was an account of how her department had set about examining their current practice and made changes based on customer feedback. Next was Sarah Murfin who spoke about her personal experience of pre-eclampsia and how health professionals can assist in the design of patient information. Peter Murray then continued the session with a talk about the ‘Comparison of quality schemes’. Kellie Pearson’s presentation was entitled ‘The second skeleton’, a look at the condition fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. The session was concluded by Norm Barker (not a ‘New Voice’ presentation) with an interesting and beautifully-illustrated talk about natural science photography. After coffee, Ed Bremner began the next plenary session with the topic of ‘Asset management’ during which he examined the importance of managing visual digital assets (image storage, databasing and retrieval). Mike Nelson then entertained us for twenty minutes relating the establishment of Medical Illustration UK Ltd. – effectively a management buy-out. Although not for everybody, it was interesting to hear about his department’s development into the commercial world. Next was a presentation entitled ‘Benchmarking – another can of worms’, from Keith Bellamy. Keith informed us of the latest IMI initiative to try and identify the relationship between medical illustration workload and hospital case-mix. Simon Dove from the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital discussed his department in relation to obtaining the Charter Mark award. Finally in this session, David Smithson gave an introduction to the IMI Archive issuing a heartfelt plea to fellow members to supply him with much-needed images. After another generous lunch, the afternoon session consisted of a wide range of topics of interest across the board. Sean Brennan gave the delegates an update on the EPR project; not much progress it seems since he first spoke to us on the topic several years ago. Shirley Smith and her team introduced the delegates to Diabeta3, a commercial clinical information system developed at St Thomas’ Hospital to manage the diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Richard Cragg delivered an overview of the use of indocyanine green dye, tracing its early history and ‘rediscovery’ since digital imaging. Ophthalmologist Mike Briggs gave a very informative talk on age-related macular degeneration and the use of photodynamic therapy to treat the condition. The next session, chaired by Madeleine Borg, began with Jason Candlin who talked of the problems caused in his department by the introduction of the NHS identity and logo. This has ultimately resulted in a reduction of workload from the administration and a concentration of support for clinical practice. Then there was a slight alteration in the scheduled plan due to a technical hitch. Sophie Jones saved the day by stepping in early with her talk about ‘Telemedicine in acute plastic trauma’. An interesting insight into how a small group of clinicians set up a very focused telemedicine project. Having sorted out the computer gremlins, Jon Rimmer gave an entertaining talk about the relationship of design and computer usability. The Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 36–38
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信