人类学理论史建构中的“自吹自擂”与“同道称赞”

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY

Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2014.937665

Richard Pace

{"title":"人类学理论史建构中的“自吹自擂”与“同道称赞”","authors":"Richard Pace","doi":"10.1080/00938157.2014.937665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of lobbying for a place in the history of anthropological theory is used to frame the importance of the autobiography, collected works, Festschrift essays, and biography reviewed here. Ranging from bottom-up historicism, behavioral paleoanthropology, and French structural Marxism to historical particularism, the books by or about Stocking, Freeman, Godelier, and Mead emphasize the contributions of each while staking out a new or extended intellectual territory or status in the fluid (re)writing of the theoretical history of the discipline.","PeriodicalId":43734,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Anthropology","volume":"43 1","pages":"180 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2014.937665","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Tooting One's Horn” and Lauding One's Fellow in the Construction of a History of Anthropological Theory\",\"authors\":\"Richard Pace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00938157.2014.937665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of lobbying for a place in the history of anthropological theory is used to frame the importance of the autobiography, collected works, Festschrift essays, and biography reviewed here. Ranging from bottom-up historicism, behavioral paleoanthropology, and French structural Marxism to historical particularism, the books by or about Stocking, Freeman, Godelier, and Mead emphasize the contributions of each while staking out a new or extended intellectual territory or status in the fluid (re)writing of the theoretical history of the discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"180 - 198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00938157.2014.937665\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2014.937665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2014.937665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

游说在人类学理论史上占有一席之地的概念被用来框定自传、文集、费斯契夫随笔和传记的重要性。从自下而上的历史决论、行为古人类学、法国结构马克思主义到历史特殊主义，斯托金、弗里曼、戈德利耶和米德撰写的或关于他们的书强调了各自的贡献，同时在学科理论史的流动(重新)写作中指出了一个新的或扩展的知识领域或地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“Tooting One's Horn” and Lauding One's Fellow in the Construction of a History of Anthropological Theory

The notion of lobbying for a place in the history of anthropological theory is used to frame the importance of the autobiography, collected works, Festschrift essays, and biography reviewed here. Ranging from bottom-up historicism, behavioral paleoanthropology, and French structural Marxism to historical particularism, the books by or about Stocking, Freeman, Godelier, and Mead emphasize the contributions of each while staking out a new or extended intellectual territory or status in the fluid (re)writing of the theoretical history of the discipline.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.