非线性助听器的阈值拟合方法——声学特性比较

Karolina Smeds, A. Leijon
{"title":"非线性助听器的阈值拟合方法——声学特性比较","authors":"Karolina Smeds, A. Leijon","doi":"10.1080/01050390152704733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six threshold-based prescriptive methods for non-linear hearing instruments were compared for a standard audiogram and three simulated listening situations. Six hearing aids were programmed according to the manufacturers' recommended initial fittings for the specified audiogram. Coupler gain measurements were then made with speech-like signals, and loudness and speech intelligibility index (SII) were calculated. Large differences between estimated insertion gain-frequency responses were seen. These differences resulted in large differences in calculated loudness, whereas the SII calculations showed only small differences between the fitting methods. For two of the methods, DSL[i/o] and FIG6, a comparison between the original prescriptions and the hearing aid manufacturers' implementations of the prescriptions was made. The results showed large differences between prescribed and implemented gain.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"213 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01050390152704733","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments - comparison of acoustic characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Smeds, A. Leijon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01050390152704733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Six threshold-based prescriptive methods for non-linear hearing instruments were compared for a standard audiogram and three simulated listening situations. Six hearing aids were programmed according to the manufacturers' recommended initial fittings for the specified audiogram. Coupler gain measurements were then made with speech-like signals, and loudness and speech intelligibility index (SII) were calculated. Large differences between estimated insertion gain-frequency responses were seen. These differences resulted in large differences in calculated loudness, whereas the SII calculations showed only small differences between the fitting methods. For two of the methods, DSL[i/o] and FIG6, a comparison between the original prescriptions and the hearing aid manufacturers' implementations of the prescriptions was made. The results showed large differences between prescribed and implemented gain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"213 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01050390152704733\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01050390152704733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01050390152704733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在标准听力图和三种模拟听力图的情况下,对非线性助听器的六种基于阈值的规定方法进行了比较。六种助听器根据制造商推荐的初始配件对指定的听图进行了编程。然后对类语音信号进行耦合器增益测量,并计算响度和语音清晰度指数(SII)。估计的插入增益-频率响应之间存在很大差异。这些差异导致了计算响度的巨大差异,而SII计算在拟合方法之间只有很小的差异。对于其中的DSL[i/o]和FIG6两种方法,将原始处方与助听器制造商对处方的实施情况进行了比较。结果表明,在规定的增益和实现的增益之间存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments - comparison of acoustic characteristics
Six threshold-based prescriptive methods for non-linear hearing instruments were compared for a standard audiogram and three simulated listening situations. Six hearing aids were programmed according to the manufacturers' recommended initial fittings for the specified audiogram. Coupler gain measurements were then made with speech-like signals, and loudness and speech intelligibility index (SII) were calculated. Large differences between estimated insertion gain-frequency responses were seen. These differences resulted in large differences in calculated loudness, whereas the SII calculations showed only small differences between the fitting methods. For two of the methods, DSL[i/o] and FIG6, a comparison between the original prescriptions and the hearing aid manufacturers' implementations of the prescriptions was made. The results showed large differences between prescribed and implemented gain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信