用于比较儿童助听器的“虚拟助听器”:一项双盲交叉研究

I. Prinz, K. Nubel, M. Gross
{"title":"用于比较儿童助听器的“虚拟助听器”:一项双盲交叉研究","authors":"I. Prinz, K. Nubel, M. Gross","doi":"10.1080/010503901316914520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a \"virtual hearing aid\" was used to compare different types of hearing aids. A digital hearing aid (Oticon DigiFocus Compact) and an analogue, automatic reference hearing aid were compared in a group of 17 schoolchildren (median age: 10 years) with moderate to severe, symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss. Differences in performance were assessed using routine diagnostic methods (speech recognition performance tests, loudness scaling), subjective assessments (questionnaires) and the \"virtual hearing aid\". Guaranteeing double-blind testing conditions, the \"virtual hearing aid\" offers the possibility to directly compare individual in-situ recordings of different hearing aids. In contrast to the clear subjective preferences for the digital hearing aid, we could not obtain any significant results with routine diagnostic methods. Using the \"virtual hearing aid\", the subjective comparison and speech recognition performance tasks yielded significant differences. The \"virtual hearing aid\" proved to be suitable for directly comparing different hearing aids under double-blind testing conditions.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"150 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901316914520","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A \\\"virtual hearing aid\\\" for comparing hearing aids in children: a double-blind crossover study\",\"authors\":\"I. Prinz, K. Nubel, M. Gross\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/010503901316914520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, a \\\"virtual hearing aid\\\" was used to compare different types of hearing aids. A digital hearing aid (Oticon DigiFocus Compact) and an analogue, automatic reference hearing aid were compared in a group of 17 schoolchildren (median age: 10 years) with moderate to severe, symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss. Differences in performance were assessed using routine diagnostic methods (speech recognition performance tests, loudness scaling), subjective assessments (questionnaires) and the \\\"virtual hearing aid\\\". Guaranteeing double-blind testing conditions, the \\\"virtual hearing aid\\\" offers the possibility to directly compare individual in-situ recordings of different hearing aids. In contrast to the clear subjective preferences for the digital hearing aid, we could not obtain any significant results with routine diagnostic methods. Using the \\\"virtual hearing aid\\\", the subjective comparison and speech recognition performance tasks yielded significant differences. The \\\"virtual hearing aid\\\" proved to be suitable for directly comparing different hearing aids under double-blind testing conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"150 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901316914520\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901316914520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901316914520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这项研究中,使用“虚拟助听器”来比较不同类型的助听器。采用数字助听器(Oticon DigiFocus Compact)和模拟自动参考助听器对17名中度至重度对称性感音神经性听力损失的学童(中位年龄:10岁)进行比较。使用常规诊断方法(语音识别性能测试,响度缩放),主观评估(问卷调查)和“虚拟助听器”来评估性能差异。“虚拟助听器”保证了双盲测试条件,提供了直接比较不同助听器的单个现场录音的可能性。与数字助听器明显的主观偏好相比,常规诊断方法无法获得明显的结果。使用“虚拟助听器”,主观比较和语音识别任务的表现产生显著差异。“虚拟助听器”被证明适合在双盲测试条件下直接比较不同的助听器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A "virtual hearing aid" for comparing hearing aids in children: a double-blind crossover study
In this study, a "virtual hearing aid" was used to compare different types of hearing aids. A digital hearing aid (Oticon DigiFocus Compact) and an analogue, automatic reference hearing aid were compared in a group of 17 schoolchildren (median age: 10 years) with moderate to severe, symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss. Differences in performance were assessed using routine diagnostic methods (speech recognition performance tests, loudness scaling), subjective assessments (questionnaires) and the "virtual hearing aid". Guaranteeing double-blind testing conditions, the "virtual hearing aid" offers the possibility to directly compare individual in-situ recordings of different hearing aids. In contrast to the clear subjective preferences for the digital hearing aid, we could not obtain any significant results with routine diagnostic methods. Using the "virtual hearing aid", the subjective comparison and speech recognition performance tasks yielded significant differences. The "virtual hearing aid" proved to be suitable for directly comparing different hearing aids under double-blind testing conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信